The two reviews. Science and humanism in tourism studies

Annals of Tourism Research

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 861-865

  Bruner, Edward M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952885154     PISSN: 01607383     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2010.04.004     Document Type: Note

References (12)

1. Ballantyne R., Packer J., Axelsen M. Trends in tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research 2009, 36:149-152.
2. Chang J. Review of culture on tour: Ethnographies of travel. Annals of Tourism Research 2009, 36:533-534.
3. Cohen E. Traditions in the qualitative sociology of tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 1988, 15:29-46.
4. Dann G., Nash D., Pearce P. Methodology in tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research 1988, 15:1-28.
5. Graburn N. Review of culture on tour: Ethnographies of travel. Annals of Tourism Research 2008, 35:843-846.
6. Kahn M. Review of culture on tour: Ethnographies of travel. American Anthropologist 2005, 4:716-717.
7. Morris M. Review of culture on tour: Ethnographies of travel. Journal of Anthropological Research 2007, 63:149-151.
8. Musacchio, T. (2009). Review of culture on tour: Ethnographies of travel. http://folkloreforum.net/category/book-review/.
9. Riley R.W., Love L. The state of qualitative tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research 2000, 27:164-187.
10. Scott J. Review of culture on tour: Ethnographies of travel. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Society 2005, 11:848-849.
11. Tribe J. The truth about tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 2006, 33:360-381.
12. Walle A.H. Quantitative versus qualitative tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research 1997, 24:524-536.