Reflections on paradigms in action in accounting research

Management Accounting Research

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2010, Pages

  Malmi, Teemu ^a  

^a HELSINKI SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Finland)

Author keywords

Accounting research; Paradigms

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952884255     PISSN: 10445005     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mar.2010.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Hopwood A.G. 'If there only were simple solutions but there aren't': some reflections on Zimmerman's critique on empirical accounting research. European Accounting Review 2002, 11(2):777-785.
2. Ittner C.D., Larcker D.F. Empirical management accounting research: are we just describing management consulting practice?. European Accounting Review 2002, 11(2):787-794.
3. Kasanen E., Lukka K., Siitonen A. The constructive approach in management accounting research. Journal of Management Accounting Research 1993, 5:243-264.
4. Luft J., Shields M.D. Zimmerman's contentious conjectures: describing present and prescribing the future of empirical accounting research. European Accounting Review 2002, 11(2):795-803.
5. Lukka K., Mouritsen J. Homogeneity or heterogeneity of research in management accounting. European Accounting Review 2002, 11(2):805-811.
6. Malmi T., Granlund M. In search of management accounting theory. European Accounting Review 2009, 18(3):597-620.
7. Malmi T., Järvinen P., Lillrank P. A collaborative approach for managing project cost of poor quality. European Accounting Review 2004, 13:293-317.
8. Orton J.D., Weick K.E. Loosely coupled systems: a reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review 1990, 15(2):203-233.
9. Quattrone P. 'We have never been post-modern': on the search of management accounting theory. European Accounting Review 2009, 18(3):621-630.
10. Zimmerman J.L. Conjectures regarding empirical managerial accounting research. Journal of Accounting and Economics 2001, 32(1-3):411-427.