Three-dimensional distribution of articular cartilage thickness in the elderly cadaveric acetabulum: A new method using three-dimensional digitizer and CT

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 795-802

  Akiyama, K ^a   Sakai, T ^a   Koyanagi, J ^a   Murase, T ^a   Yoshikawa, H ^a   Sugamoto, K ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

3D digitizer; Cartilage thickness; Computed tomography; Proximity mapping; Surface registration

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ACETABULUM; AGED; ANALOG DIGITAL CONVERTER; ARTICLE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; CADAVER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; LUNATE BONE; MALE; MORPHOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; STEREOMICROSCOPY; THICKNESS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ACETABULUM; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; CADAVER; CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77952877891     PISSN: 10634584     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Nishii T., Sugano N., Tanaka H., Nakanishi K., Ohzono K., Yoshikawa H. Articular cartilage abnormalities in dysplastic hips without joint space narrowing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, 383:183-190.
2. Noguchi Y., Miura H., Takasugi S., Iwamoto Y. Cartilage and labrum degeneration in the dysplastic hip generally originates in the anterosuperior weight-bearing area: an arthroscopic observation. Arthroscopy 1999, 15:496-506.
3. Adam C., Eckstein F., Milz S., Putz R. The distribution of cartilage thickness within the joints of the lower limb of elderly individuals. J Anat 1998, 193:203-214.
4. Haidukewych G.J., Israel T.A., Berry D.J. Long-term survivorship of cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for fracture of the femoral neck. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002, 403:118-126.
5. Rizzo M., Pace T.B. Premature failure of a hip hemiarthroplasty secondary to osteolysis and aseptic loosening. Am J Orthop 2003, 32:206-209.
6. Schmidt A.H., Leighton R., Parvizi J., Sems A., Berry D.J. Optimal arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures: is total hip arthroplasty the answer?. J Orthop Trauma 2009, 23:428-433.
7. Wyler A., Bousson V., Bergot C., Polivka M., Leveque E., Vicaut E., et al. Hyaline cartilage thickness in radiographically normal cadaveric hips: comparison of spiral CT arthrographic and macroscopic measurements. Radiology 2007, 242:441-449.
8. Nishii T., Sugano N., Sato Y., Tanaka H., Miki H., Yoshikawa H. Three-dimensional distribution of acetabular cartilage thickness in patients with hip dysplasia: a fully automated computational analysis of MR imaging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004, 12:650-657.
9. Kurrat H.J., Oberländer W. The thickness of the cartilage in the hip joint. J Anat 1978, 126:145-155.
10. Athanasiou K.A., Agarwal A., Dzida F.J. Comparative study of the intrinsic mechanical properties of the human acetabular and femoral head cartilage. J Orthop Res 1994, 12:340-349.
11. Shepherd D.E.T., Seedhom B.B. Thickness of human articular cartilage in joints of the lower limb. Ann Rheum Dis 1999, 58:27-34.
12. Eckstein F., von Eisenhart-Rothe R., Landgraf J., Adam C., Loehe F., Müller-Gerbl M., et al. Quantitative analysis of incongruity, contact areas and cartilage thickness in the human hip joint. Acta Anat 1997, 158:192-204.
13. von Eisenhart R., Adam C., Steinlechner M., Müller-Gerbl M., Eckstein F. Quantitative determination of joint incongruity and pressure distribution during simulated gait and cartilage thickness in the human hip joint. J Orthop Res 1999, 17:532-539.
14. Sahara W., Sugamoto K., Nakajima Y., Inui H., Yamazaki T., Yoshikawa H. Three-dimensional morphological analysis of humeral heads: a study in cadavers. Acta Orthop 2005, 76:392-396.
15. Persson A., Andersson M., Oden A., Sandborgh-Englund G. A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touch-probe scanner. J Prosthet Dent 2006, 95:194-200.
16. Sokovic M., Kopac J. RE (reverse engineering) as necessary phase by rapid product development. J Mater Process Technol 2006, 175:398-403.
17. Su B., Dhara S., Wang L. Green ceramic machining: a top-down approach for the rapid fabrication of complex-shaped ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc 2008, 28:2109-2115.
18. Gu D., Chen Y., Dai K., Zhang S., Yuan J. The shape of the acetabular cartilage surface: a geometric morphometric study using three-dimensional scanning. Med Eng Phys 2008, 30:1024-1031.
19. Millington S.A., Grabner M., Wozelka R., Anderson D.D., Hurwitz S.R., Crandall J.R. Quantification of ankle articular cartilage topography and thickness using a high resolution stereophotography system. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007, 15:205-211.
20. Graichen H., Springer V., Flaman T., Stammberger T., Glaser C., Englmeier K.H., et al. Validation of high-resolution water-excitation magnetic resonance imaging for quantitative assessment of thin cartilage layers. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2000, 8:106-114.
21. El-Khoury G.Y., Alliman K.J., Lundberg H.J., Rudert M.J., Brown T.D., Saltzman C.L. Cartilage thickness in cadaveric ankles: measurement with double-contrast multi-detector row CT arthrography versus MR imaging. Radiology 2004, 233:768-773.
22. Haubner M., Eckstein F., Schnier M., Lösch A., Sittek H., Becker C., et al. A non-invasive technique for 3-dimensional assessment of articular cartilage thickness based on MRI. Part 2: validation using CT arthrography. Magn Reson Imaging 1997, 15:805-813.
23. Wyler A., Bousson V., Bergot C., Polivka M., Leveque E., Vicaut E., et al. Comparison of MR-arthrography and CT-arthrography in hyaline cartilage-thickness measurement in radiographically normal cadaver hips with anatomy as gold standard. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009, 17:19-25.
24. Aamodt A., Kvistad K.A., Andersen E., Lund-Larsen J., Eine J., Benum P., et al. Determination of Hounsfield value for CT-based design of custom femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999, 81:143-147.
25. Materialize. Clinical Available at:, [accessed 19.07.05]. http://www.materialise.com.
26. Besl P.J., Mackay N. A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans Patt Anal 1992, 14:239-256.
27. Moritomo H., Viegas S.F., Elder K.W., Nakamura K., DaSilva M.F., Boyd N.L., et al. Scaphoid nonunions: a 3-dimensional analysis of patterns of deformity. J Hand Surg [Am] 2000, 25:520-528.
28. Goto A., Moritomo H., Murase T., Oka K., Sugamoto K., Arimura T., et al. In vivo elbow biomechanical analysis during flexion: three-dimensional motion analysis using magnetic resonance imaging. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2004, 13:441-447.
29. Neu C.P., McGovern R.D., Crisco J.J. Kinematic accuracy of three surface registration methods in a three-dimensional wrist bone study. J Biomech Eng 2000, 122:528-533.
30. Modest V.E., Murphy M.C., Mann R.W. Optical verification of a technique for in situ ultrasonic measurement of articular cartilage thickness. J Biomech 1989, 22:171-176.
31. Jurvelin J.S., Räsänen T., Kolomonen P., Lyyra T. Comparison of optical, needle probe and ultrasonic techniques for the measurement of articular cartilage thickness. J Biomech 1995, 28:231-235.
32. Adam C., Eckstein F., Milz S., Schulte E., Becker C., Putz R. The distribution of cartilage thickness in the knee-joint of old-aged individuals - measured by A-mode ultrasound. Clin Biomech 1998, 13:1-10.
33. Wiberg G. Studies on dysplastic acetabular and congenital subluxation of the hip joint: with special reference to the complication of osteo-arthritis. Acta Chir Scand 1939, 58:7-38.
34. Nötzli H.P., Wyss T.F., Stoecklin C.H., Schmid M.R., Treiber K., Hodler J. The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002, 84:556-560.
35. Hipp J.A., Sugano N., Millis M.B., Murphy S.B. Planning acetabular redirection osteotomies based on joint contact pressure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999, 364:134-143.
36. Bessho M., Ohnishi I., Matsumoto T., Ohashi S., Matsuyama J., Tobita K., et al. Prediction of proximal femur strength using a CT-based nonlinear finite element method: differences in predicted fracture load and site with changing load and boundary conditions. Bone 2009, 45:226-231.
37. Lu H.M. A 3D digitzation system for conventional radiation therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2005, 6:108-117.
38. Sugano N., Sasama T., Sato Y., Nakajima Y., Nishii T., Yonenobu K., et al. Accuracy evaluation of surface-based registration methods in a computer navigation system for hip surgery performed through a posterolateral approach. Comput Aided Surg 2001, 6:195-203.
39. Ishii T., Mukai Y., Hosono N., Sakaura H., Nakajima Y., Sato Y., et al. Kinematics of the upper cervical spine in rotation: in vivo three-dimensional analysis. Spine 2004, 29:E139-E144.
40. Watanabe A., Boesch C., Anderson S.E., Brehm W., Mainil Varlet P. Ability of dGEMRIC and T2 mapping to evaluate cartilage repair after microfracture: a goat study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009, 17:1341-1349.