Does the introduction of a COPD pro-forma improve the standards of care delivered by junior doctors in the emergency department

COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 199-203

  Sen, Basav ^a   Woollard, Malcolm ^b   Desira, Nicola L ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b Institute for Clean Growth and Future Mobility   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Classification; COPD; Forms; Non invasive ventilation; Respiratory failure

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTERIAL GAS; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BLOOD GAS ANALYSIS; CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE EXACERBATION; EMERGENCY CARE; EMERGENCY WARD; FEMALE; HOSPITAL PHYSICIAN; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPEAT PROCEDURE; RESPIRATORY FAILURE; REVIEW; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; MEDICAL STAFF; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROCEDURES; PULMONARY DISEASE, CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE; RESPIRATORY INSUFFICIENCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARDS; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PULMONARY DISEASE, CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; RESPIRATORY INSUFFICIENCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 77952871799     PISSN: 15412555     EISSN: 15412563     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/15412555.2010.481699     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Lost in Translation. Bridging the communication gap in COPD (June 2006) British Lung Foundation Survey.
2. Roberts CM, Ryland I, Lowe D, Kelly Y, Bucknall CE, Pearson MG. Clinical audit indicators of outcome following admission to hospital with acute exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Thorax 2002; 57:137-141.
3. Price LC, Lowe D, Hosker HSR, Pearson, Roberts CM. UK National COPD Audit 2003: impact of hospital resources and organisation of care on patient outcome following admission for acute COPD exacerbation. Thorax 2006; 61:837-842.
4. Roberts CM, Barnes S, Lowe D, Pearson MG. Evidence for a link between mortality in acute COPD and hospital type and resources. Thorax 2003; 58:947-949.
5. The British Thoracic Society (BTS). Guidelines for the management of COPD. Thorax 1997; 52:1-28.
6. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. National clinical guideline on management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in adults in primary and secondary care. Thorax March 2004; 59 Suppl. 1;1-232.
7. The Academy of Royal Colleges and managed by the Clinical Effectiveness Evaluation Unit of the Royal College of Physicians. Audit of process and outcome in cases of acute exacerbations of COPD admitted to hospital'. A pilot study commissioned by The Academy of Royal Colleges and managed by the Clinical Effectiveness Evaluation Unit of the Royal College of Physicians supported by the Audit Subcommittee of the Standards of Care committee of the British Thoracic Society. 2002
8. Royal College of Physicians and British Thoracic Society. (2008). Report of the National Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Audit 2008. COPD exacerbations admitted to acute HNS units. Retrieved March 10, 2009, from http://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/clinical-standards/ceeu/Currentwork/ ncrop/Documents/Report-of-The-National-COPD-Audit-2008-clinical-audit-of-COPD- exacerbations-admitted-to-acute-NHSunits-across-the-UK.pdf.
9. Meyer RJ, Town GI, Harre E, Koning M, Hurrell M, Beard ME, Chambers ST. An audit of the assessment and management of adults admitted to Christchurch Hospital with community acquired pneumonia. New Zeal Med J 1997; 110:349-352.
10. Soulsby T. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of spontaneous pneumothorax: do we comply with them and do they work? J Acc Emerg Med 1998; 15:317-321.
11. Mendis D, El-Shanawany T, Mathur A, Redington AE. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: are British Thoracic Society guidelines being followed? Postgrad Med J 2002; 78:80-84.
12. Hart SR, Davidson AC. Acute adult asthma - assessment of severity and management and comparison with British Thoracic Society Guidelines. Respir Med 1999; 93:8-10.
13. Cohen S, Taitz J, Jaffe A. Paediatric prescribing of asthma drugs in the UK: are we sticking to the guideline? Arch Dis Child 2007; 92:847-849.
14. Robinson SM, Harrison BDW, Lambert MA. Effect of a preprinted form on the management of acute asthma in an accident and emergency department. J Acc Emer Med 1996; 13: 93-97.
15. Nicol MF. A risk management audit: are we complying with the national guidelines for sedation by non-anaesthetists. J Acci Emerg Med 1999; 16:120-122.
16. Steurer-Stey C, Grob U, Jung S, Vetter W, Steurer J. Education and a standardizedmanagement protocol improve the assessment and management of asthma in the emergency department. Swiss Med Week 2005; 135:222-227.
17. Medford AR, Pepperell JC. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax compared to British Thoracic Society (BTS) 2003 guidelines: A district general hospital audit. Prim Care Respi J 2007; 16:291-298.
18. Self TH, Usery JB, Howard-Thompson AM, Sands C. Asthma treatment protocols in the emergency department: are they effective? J Asthma 2007; 44:243-248.
19. BTS. Guidelines for non-invasive ventilatory support in respiratory failure. Thorax 2002; 57:192-211.