Method to characterize aquitards above leaky aquifers with water supply wells;Une méthode pour caractériser les épontes des aquifères semi-captifs à l'aide de puits de production

Hydrogeology Journal

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 595-605

  Ostendorf, David W ^a   DeGroot, Don J ^a   Judge, Aaron I ^a   LaMesa, Daniel F ^a  

^a University of Massachusetts Amherst   (United States)

Author keywords

Analytical solutions; Confining units; Groundwater protection; Hydraulic properties; Hydraulic testing

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL METHOD; AQUIFER CHARACTERIZATION; AQUITARD; COMPRESSIBILITY; CONFINED AQUIFER; ESTIMATION METHOD; GROUNDWATER FLOW; HYDRAULIC PROPERTY; MONITORING; NUMERICAL MODEL; PERMEABILITY; WATER SUPPLY; WELL TESTING;

MASSACHUSETTS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77952832044     PISSN: 14312174     EISSN: 14350157     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-009-0563-7     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Abramowitz M, Stegun IA (1972) Handbook of mathematical functions. National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC.
2. Barker JA, Lawrence AR (2008) A simple model of leakage induced by deep pumping and its application to pollution beneath a city in Thailand. Hydrogeol J 16: 407-417.
3. Batu V (1998) Aquifer hydraulics. Wiley, New York.
4. Beveridge GSG, Schechter RS (1970) Optimization: theory and practice. McGraw-Hill, New York.
5. Bouwer H, Rice RC (1976) A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells. Water Resour Res 12: 423-428.
6. Conte E, Troncone A (2008) Soil layer response to pore pressure variations at the boundary. Geotechnique 58: 37-44.
7. Flint RF (1971) Glacial and quaternary geology. Wiley, New York.
8. Freeze RA, Cherry JA (1979) Groundwater. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
9. Hantush MS (1956) Analysis of data from pumping tests in leaky aquifers. Trans AGU 37: 702-714.
10. Hildebrand FB (1976) Advanced calculus for applications. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
11. Jacob CE (1946) Radial flow to a leaky artesian aquifer. Trans AGU 27: 198-208.
12. Klinger AR (1996) Estimated short term yields of and quality of groundwater in stratified drift aquifer areas in the Neponset River basin, Massachusetts. Water Resour Invest Rep, US Geological Survey, Marlborough, MA.
13. Neuman SP, Witherspoon PA (1969) Applicability of current theories of flow in leaky aquifers. Water Resour Res 5: 817-829.
14. Ostendorf DW, Kilbridge CJ (2009) Roadsalt aquifer impact case study: a mass balance. J New England Waterworks Assoc 123: 238-251.
15. Sandven R (2003) Geotechnical properties of a natural silt deposit obtained from field and laboratory tests. In: Tan et al (eds) Characterisation and engineering properties of natural soils, vol 2. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, pp 1237-1276.
16. Simonini P, Ricceri G, Cola S (2007) Geotechnical characterization and properties of Venice lagoon heterogeneous silts. In: Tan et al (eds) Characterisation and engineering properties of natural soils, vol 4. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, pp 2289-2327.
17. Spiegel MR (1965) Laplace transforms. McGraw-Hill, New York.
18. Terzhagi K, Peck RB (1968) Soil mechanics in engineering practice. Wiley, New York.
19. Thevanayagam S, Martin GR (2002) Liquifaction in silty soils-screening and remediation issues. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 22: 1035-1042.