Analysis of18F-FDG uptake pattern in PET for diagnosis of aseptic loosening versus prosthesis infection after total knee arthroplasty a prospective pilot study

NuklearMedizin

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 115-123

  Gravius, S ^a   Gebhard, M ^a   Ackermann, D ^a   Bull U ^a   Hermanns Sachweh, B ^a   Mumme, T ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

FDG PET; Knee; Prosthesis infection; Prosthesis loosening; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DRUG UPTAKE; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; FEMALE; FEMUR; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; JOINT SCINTISCANNING; MALE; PILOT STUDY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; RADIOISOTOPE DISTRIBUTION; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; EQUIPMENT; INFECTION; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCINTISCANNING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; HUMANS; INFECTION; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 77952829798     PISSN: 00295566     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3413/nukmed-0278     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Barrack RL, Jennings RW, Wolfe MW, Bertot AJ. The Coventry Award. The value of preoperative aspiration before total knee revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997; 345: 8-16.
2. Beer AJ, Schwaiger M. Molekulare Bildgebung mit neuen PET-Tracern. Radiologe 2007; 47: 8-17.
3. Chacko TK, Zhuang H, Stevenson K et al. The importance of the location of fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in periprosthetic infection in painful hip prostheses. Nucl Med Commun 2002; 23: 851-855.
4. 18F-FDG- Speichermusters in der PET zur Diagnostik von septischer und aseptischer Lockerung bei Totalprothesen des Hüftgelenkes. Nuklearmedizin 2003; 42: 234-239.
5. 18F-FDG PET for the diagnosis of endoprosthetic loosening and infection in hip and knee arthroplasty: results from a prospective, blinded study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006; 7: 20.
6. Di Cesare PE, Chang E, Preston CF, Liu CJ. Serum interleukin-6 as a marker of periprosthetic infection following total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 2005; 87: 1921-1927.
7. Gollwitzer H, Diehl P, Gerdesmeyer L, Mittelmeier W. Diagnostische Strategien bei Verdacht auf periprothetische Infektion einer Kniegelenkstotalendoprothese: Literaturübersicht und aktuelle Empfehlungen. Orthopäde 2006; 35: 904-916.
8. Gravius S, Mumme T, Delank KS et al. Immunhistochemische Analyse periprothetischer Osteolysen bei aseptischer Hüftprothesenlockerung. Z Orthop Unfall 2007; 145: 169-175.
9. Klett R, Steiner D, Laurich S et al. Evaluation of aseptic loosening of knee prostheses by quantitative bone scintigraphy. Nuklearmedizin 2008; 47: 163-166.
10. Kordelle J, Klett R, Stahl U et al. Infektionsdiagnostik nach Knie-TEP Implantation. Z Orthop 2004; 142: 337-343.
11. Manthey N, Reinhard P, Moog F et al. The use of 18F fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to differentiate between synovitis, loosening and infection of hip and knee prosthesis. Nucl Med Commun 2002; 23: 645-653. (Pubitemid 34748004)
12. Morawietz L, Gehrke T, Claßen RA et al. Vorschlag für die Konsensus-Klassifikation der periprothetischen Membran gelockerter Hüft- und Knieprothesen. Pathologe 2004; 25: 375-384.
13. Mumme T, Reinartz P, Alfer J et al. Diagnostic values of positron emissions tomography versus triplephase bone scan in hip arthroplasty loosening. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2005; 125: 322-329. (Pubitemid 40895353)
14. 18F- Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) Positronenemissionstomographie (PET) als Differenzialdiagnostikum der Hüftendoprothesenlockerung. Z Orthop 2003; 141: 540-546.
15. Panousis K, Grigoris P, Butcher I et al. Poor predictive value of broad-range PCR for the detection of arthroplasty infection in 92 cases. Acta Orthop 2005; 76: 645-648.
16. Reinartz P, Mumme T, Hermanns B et al. Radionuclide imaging of the painful hip arthroplasty: positron-emissions tomography versus triple-phase bone scanning. J Bone Joint Surg 2005; 87: 465-470.
17. Reinartz P. FDG-PET in patients with painful hip and knee arthroplasty: technical breakthrough or just more of the same. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009; 53: 41-50.
18. Smith SL, Wastie ML, Forster I. Radionuclide bone scintigraphy in the detecting of significant complications after total knee joint replacement. Clin Radiol 2001; 56: 221-224. (Pubitemid 36503350)
19. Steinbrink K, Frommelt L. Treatment of periprosthetic infection of the hip using one-stage exchange surgery. Orthopäde 1995; 24: 335-343.
20. 18F fluoride positron emission tomography in the early detection of aseptic loosening of total knee arthroplasty. Int J Surg 2007; 5: 99-104.
21. Stumpe KD, Romero J, Ziegler O et al. The value of FDG-PET in patients with painful total knee arthroplasty. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008; 33: 1218-1225.
22. Teller RE, Christie MJ, Martin W et al. Sequential indium-labeled leukocyte and bone scans to diagnose prosthetic joint infection. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2000; 373: 241-247.
23. 99mTc-HMPAO white blood cell SPET and bone scintigraphy in the evaluation of painful total knee arthroplasties. Eur J Nucl Med 2001; 28: 1496-1504.
24. Winter F de, Wiele C van de, Vogelaers D et al. FDG-PET as a single technique is more accurate than the combination of bone scan and white blood cell scan in chronic orthopaedic infections. J Nucl Med 2000; 41: 16.
25. Zhuang H, Chacko TK, Hickeson M et al. Persistent non-specific FDG uptake on PET imaging following hip arthroplasty. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002; 29: 1328-1333.
26. 18FDG-PET in detecting infected lower limb prosthesis implants. J Nucl Med 2001; 42: 44-48.