Can we predict the number of plant species from the richness of a few common genera, families or orders?

Journal of Applied Ecology

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 662-670

  Mazaris, Antonios D ^a   Kallimanis, Athanasios S ^b   Tzanopoulos, Joseph ^a   Sgardelis, Stefanos P ^a   Pantis, John D ^a  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOANNINA   (Greece)

Author keywords

Commonness and rarity; Conservation biogeography; Greece; Higher taxonomic levels; Natura 2000 Network; Rapid biodiversity assessments; Surrogate methods

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION PLANNING; PHYTOGEOGRAPHY; PLANT COMMUNITY; PREDICTION; PROTECTED AREA; RARITY; SPECIES RICHNESS; SURROGATE METHOD; TAXONOMY;

GREECE;

EID: 77952827075     PISSN: 00218901     EISSN: 13652664     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01814.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Andersen AN. Measuring more of biodiversity: genus richness as a surrogate for species richness in Australian - ant faunas. Biological Conservation 1995, 73:39-43.
2. Báldi A. Using higher taxa as surrogates of species richness: a study based on 3700 Coleoptera, Diptera, and Acari species in Central-Hungarian reserves. Basic and Applied Ecology 2003, 4:589-593.
3. Balmford A, Green MJB, Murray MG. Using higher-taxon richness as a surrogate for species richness: I. Regional tests. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Biological Sciences B 1996, 263:1267-1274.
4. Balmford A, Lyon AJE, Lang RM. Testing the higher-taxon approach to conservation planning in a megadiverse group: the macrofungi. Biological Conservation 2000, 93:209-217.
5. Barr GE, Babbitt KJ. A comparison of 2 techniques to sample larval stream salamanders. Wildlife Society Bulletin 2001, 29:1238-1242.
6. Basset Y, Novotny V, Miller SE, George D, Weiblen GD, Missa O, Stewart AJA. Conservation and biological monitoring of tropical forests: the role of parataxonomist. Journal of Applied Ecology 2004, 41:163-174.
7. Bell S, Marzano M, Cent J, Kobierska H, Podjed D, Vandzinskaite D, Reinert H, Armaitiene A, Grodzińska-Jurczak M, Muršič R. What counts? Volunteers and their organisations in the recording and monitoring of biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 2008, 17:3443-3454.
8. Benton MJ. The Phylocode: beating a dead horse? Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 2007, 52:651-655.
9. Bergamini A, Scheidegger C, Stofer S, Carvalho P, Davey S, Dietrich M, Farkas E, Groner U, Ivits E, Kärkkäinen K, Keller C, Koch B, Lökös L, Lommi L, Máguas C, Mitchell R, Pinho P, Rico V, Rubio AJ, Truscott AM, Wolseley P, Watt A. Performance of macrolichens and lichen genera as indicators of lichen species richness and composition. Conservation Biology 2005, 19:1051-1062.
10. Brooks TM, da Fonseca GAB, Rodrigues ASL. Protected areas and species. Conservation Biology 2004, 18:616-618.
11. Cantino PD, de Queiroz K. PhyloCode: A Phylogenetic Code of Biological Nomenclature 2004, http://www.ohiou.edu/phylocode/, Available at: [] (accessed on 10 Feb 2010)
12. Cardoso P, Silva I, de Oliveira NG, Serrano ARM. Higher taxa surrogates of spider (Araneae) diversity and their efficiency in conservation. Biological Conservation 2004, 117:453-459.
13. Cox G. Laboratory Manual of General Ecology 1990, 6th edn, William C. Brown, Dubuque, IA
14. De Queiroz K. The PhyloCode and the distinction between taxonomy and nomenclature. Systematic Biology 2006, 55:160-162.
15. Erwin TL. Tropical forest canopies: the last biotic frontier. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 1983, 29:14-19.
16. Faith DP, Nix HA, Margules CR, Hutchinson MF, Walker PA, West J, Stein JL, Kesteven JK, Allison A, Natera G. The BioRap biodiversity assessment and planning study for Papua New Guinea. Pacific Conservation Biology 2001, 6:279-288.
17. Fjeldså J. The relevance of systematics in choosing priority areas for global conservation. Environmental Conservation 2000, 27:65-75.
18. Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM. Mapping biodiversity using surrogates for species richness: macro-scales and New World birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 1995, 262:335-341.
19. Gaston KJ, Williams PH. Mapping the world's species - the higher taxon approach. Biodiversity Letters 1993, 1:1-8.
20. Grelle CEV. Is higher-taxon analysis an useful surrogate of species richness in studies of Neotropical mammal diversity? Biological Conservation 2002, 108:101-106.
21. La Ferla B, Japlin J, Ockwell D, Lovett JC. Continental scale patterns of biodiversity: can higher taxa accurately predict African plant distributions? Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 2002, 138:225-235.
22. Larsen FW, Rahbek C. The influence of spatial grain size on the suitability of the higher-taxon approach in continental priority-setting. Animal Conservation 2005, 8:389-396.
23. Lawton JH, Bignell DE, Bolton B, Bloemers GF, Eggleton P, Hammond MP, Hodda M, Holt RD, Larsen TB, Mawdsley NA, Stork NE, Srivastava DS, Watt AD. Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forests. Nature 1998, 391:72-76.
24. Lengyel S, Déri E, Varga Z, Horváth R, Tóthmérész PB, Henry PY, Kobler A, Kutnar L, Babij V, Seliškar A, Christia C, Papastergiadou E, Gruber B, Henle K. Habitat monitoring in Europe: a description of current practices. Biodiversity and Conservation 2008, 17:3327-3339.
25. Lennon JJ, Koleff P, Greenwood JJD, Gaston KJ. Contribution of rarity and commonness to patterns of species richness. Ecology Letters 2004, 7:81-87.
26. Margules CR, Pressey RL. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 2000, 405:243-253.
27. Mazaris AD, Kallimanis AS, Sgardelis SP, Pantis JD. Does higher taxon diversity reflect richness of conservation interest species? The case for birds, mammals, amphibians, and reptiles in Greek protected areas. Ecological Indicators 2008a, 8:664-671.
28. Mazaris AD, Tzanopoulos J, Kallimanis AS, Matsinos YG, Sgardelis SP, Pantis JD. The contribution of common and rare species to plant species richness patterns: the effect of habitat type and size of sampling unit. Biodiversity and Conservation 2008b, 17:3567-3577.
29. Miller SE, Rogo LM. Challenges and opportunities in understanding and utilisation of African insect diversity. Cimbebasia 2002, 17:197-218.
30. Negi HR, Gadgil M. Cross-taxon surrogacy of biodiversity in the Indian Garhwal Himalaya. Biological Conservation 2002, 105:143-155.
31. Nixon KC, Carpenter JM. On the other phylogenetic systematics. Cladistics 2000, 16:298-318.
32. Pearman PB, Weber D. Common species determine richness patterns in biodiversity indicator taxa. Biological Conservation 2007, 138:109-119.
33. Prance GT. A comparison of the efficacy of higher taxa and species numbers in the assessment of biodiversity in the Neotropics. Philosophical Transections of the Royal Society of London, Series B 1994, 345:89-99.
34. Prendergast JR, Quinn RM, Lawton JH, Eversham BC, Gibbons DW. Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 1993, 365:335-337.
35. Pressey RL, Hagar TC, Ryan KM, Schwarz J, Wall S, Ferrier S, Creaser PM. Using abiotic data for conservation assessments over extensive regions: quantitative methods applied across New South Wales, Australia. Biological Conservation 2000, 96:55-82.
36. Prinzing A, Klotz S, Stadler J, Brandl R. Woody plants in Kenya: expanding the Higher-Taxon Approach. Biological Conservation 2003, 110:307-314.
37. Raven PH, Wilson EO. A 50year plan for biodiversity surveys. Science 1992, 258:1099-1110.
38. Vanderklift MA, Ward TJ, Phillips JC. Use of assemblages derived from different taxonomic levels to select areas for conserving marine biodiversity. Biological Conservation 1998, 86:307-315.
39. Vazquez L, Gaston KJ. Rarity, commonness and patterns of species richness: the mammals of Mexico. Global Ecology and Biogeography 2004, 13:535-542.
40. Villaseñor JL, Ibarra-Manríquez G, Meave JA, Ortiz E. Higher taxa as surrogates of plant diversity in a megadiverse country. Conservation Biology 2005, 19:232-238.
41. Williams PH, Gaston KJ. Measuring more of biodiversity: can higher-taxon richness predict wholesale species richness? Biological Conservation 1994, 67:211-217.
42. Williams PH, Humphries CJ, Gaston KJ. Centres of seed-plant diversity: the family way. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 1994, 256:67-70.
43. Winston JE, Metzger KL. Trends in taxonomy revealed by the published literature. BioScience 1998, 48:125-128.
44. Wortley AH, Bennett JR, Scotland RW. Taxonomy and phylogeny reconstruction: two distinct research agendas in systematics. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 2002, 59:335-349.