The effects of forecasting on creative problem-solving: An experimental study

Creativity Research Journal

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 119-138

  Byrne, Cristina L ^a   Shipman, Amanda S ^a   Mumford, Michael D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952819252     PISSN: 10400419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2010.481482     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Antes, A. L., & Mumford, M. D. (2009). Effects of time frame on creative thought: Process versus problem-solving effects. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 166-182.
2. Anzai, Y. (1984). Cognitive control of real-time event driven systems. Cognitive Science, 8, 221-254.
3. Baer, J. (2003). Evaluative thinking, creativity, and task specificity: Separating wheat from chaff is not the same as finding needle in haystacks. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Critical creative processes (pp. 129-152). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
4. Basadur, M., Runco, M. A., & Vega, L. A. (2000). Understanding how creative thinking skills, attitudes, and behaviors work together: A causal process model. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34, 77-100.
5. Baughman, W. A., & Mumford, M. D. (1995). Process analytic models of creative capacities: Operations involved in the combination and reorganization process. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 37-62.
6. Becker, T. E., Billings, R. S., Eveleth, D. M., & Gilbert, N. W. (1997). Validity of scores on three attachment style scales: Exploratory and confirmatory evidence. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 477-493.
7. Bedell-Avers, K. E., Hunter, S. T., & Mumford, M. D. (2008). Conditions of problem-solving and the performance of charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders: A comparative experimental study. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 89-106.
8. Bell, N. J., Matthews, T. D., Lassiter, K. S., & Leverett, K. S. (2002). Validity of the Wonderlic personnel test as a measure of fluid or crystallized intelligence: Implications for career assessment. North American Journal of Psychology, 4, 113-120.
9. Berger, R. M., Guilford, J. P., & Christensen, P. R. (1957). A factor-analytic study of planning abilities. Psychological Monographs, 71, 1-31.
10. Berger, C. R., & Jordan, J. M. (1992). Planning sources, planning difficulty, and verbal fluency. Communication Monographs, 59, 130-148.
11. Besemer, S. P., & O'Quin, K. (1999). Confirming the three-factor creative product analysis matrix model in an American sample. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 287-296.
12. Brophy, D. R. (1998). Understanding, measuring, and enhancing individual creative problem-solving efforts. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 123-150.
13. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
14. Castrogiovani, G. J. (1996). Pre-start-up planning and the survival of new small business: Theoretical linkages. Journal of Management, 22, 801-822.
15. Christiaans, H. H. C. M. (2002). Creativity as a design criterion. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 41-54.
16. Conway, J. M., & Peneno, G. M. (1999). Comparing structured interview question types: Construct validity and applicant reactions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13, 485-506.
17. Dailey, L., & Mumford, M. D. (2006). Evaluative aspects of creative thought: Errors in appraising the implications of new ideas. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 367-384.
18. Dorner, D., & Schaub, H. (1994). Errors in planning and decision making and the nature of human information processing. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 43, 433-453.
19. Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, W. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49, 725-747.
20. Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Frisch, M. B., & Jessop, N. S. (1989). Improving WAIS-R estimates with the Shipley-Hartford and the Wonderlic Personnel Test: Need to control for reading ability. Psychological Reports, 65, 923-928.
22. Getzels, J. S., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: Wiley.
23. Ghiselin, B. (1963). Ultimate criteria for two levels of creativity. In C. W. Taylor & F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development (pp. 30-43). New York: Wiley.
24. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
25. Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
26. Hammond, K. J. (1990). Case-based planning: A framework for learning from experience. Cognitive Science, 14, 385-443.
27. Hawkins, K. A., Faraone, S. V., Pepple, J. R., Seidman, L. J., & Tsuang, M. T. (1990). WAIS-R validation of the Wonderlic Personnel Test as a brief intelligence measure in a psychiatric sample. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2, 198-201.
28. Hunter, S. T., Bedell-Avers, K. E., Hunsicker, C. M., Mumford, M. D., & Ligon, G. S. (2008). Applying multiple knowledge structures in creative thought: Effects on idea generation and problem-solving. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 137-154.
29. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2004). The history of mental models. In K. Manktelow & M. C. Chung (Eds.), Psychology of reasoning: Theoretical and historical perspectives (pp. 179-212). New York: Psychology Press.
30. Kettner, N. W., Guilford, J. P., & Christensen, P. R. (1959). A factor analysis study across the domains of reasoning, creativity, and evaluation. Psychological Monographs, 73, 1-31.
31. Kolodner, J. L. (1997). Educational implications of analogy. A view from case-based reasoning. American Psychologist, 52, 57-66.
32. Licuanan, B., Dailey, L. R., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). Idea evaluation: Error in evaluating highly original ideas. Unpublished manuscript, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK.
33. Lonergan, D. C., Scott, G. M., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). Evaluative aspects of creative thought: Effects of idea appraisal and revision standards. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 231-246.
34. Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present, and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 295-308.
35. Mainemelis, C. (2002). Time and timelessness: Creativity in (and out of) the temporal dimension. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 227-238.
36. Marcy, R. T., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Social innovation: Enhancing creative performance through causal analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 123-140.
37. McKelvie, S. J. (1989). The Wonderlic Personnel Test: Reliability and validity in an academic setting. Psychological Reports, 65, 161-162.
38. Merrifield, P. R., Guilford, J. P., Christensen, P. R., & Frick, J. W. (1962). The role of intellectual factors in problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 76, 1-21.
39. Motowidlo, S. J., Dunnette, M. D., & Carter, G. W. (1990). An alternative selection procedure: The low-fidelity simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 640-647.
40. Mumford, M. D. (2001). Something old, something new: Revisiting Guilford's conception of creative problem solving. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 267-276.
41. Mumford, M. D. (2002). Social innovation: Ten cases from Benjamin Franklin. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 253-266.
42. Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., & Sager, C. E. (2003). Picking the right material: Cognitive processing skills and their role in creative thought. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Critical creative processes (pp. 19-68). Creskill, NJ: Hampton.
43. Mumford, M. D., Friedrich, T. L., Caughron, J. J., & Byrne, C. L. (2007). Leader cognition in real-world settings: How do leaders think about crises? Leadership Quarterly, 18, 515-543.
44. Mumford, M., & Gustafson, S. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27-43.
45. Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (2007). Creative thought: Cognition and problem solving in a dynamic system. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Creativity research handbook: Vol. 2 (pp. 33-77). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
46. Mumford, M. D., Lonergan, D. C., & Scott, G. M. (2002). Evaluating creative ideas: Processes, standards, and context. Critical Inquiry, 22, 21-30.
47. Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Uhlman, C. E., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Doares, L. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 91-122.
48. Mumford, M. D., Schultz, R. A., & Osburn, H. K. (2002). Planning in organizations: Performance as a multi-level phenomenon. In F. J. Yammarino & F. Dansereau (Eds.), Research in multi-level issues (Vol. 1): The many faces of multi-level issues (pp. 3-36). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
49. Mumford, M. D., Schultz, R. A., & Van Doorn, J. R. (2001). Performance in planning: Processes, requirements, and errors. Review of General Psychology, 5, 213-240.
50. Mumford, M. D., Stokes, G. S., & Owens, W. A. (1990). Patterns of life adaptation: The ecology of human individuality. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
51. Noice, H. (1991). The role of explanations and plan recognition in the learning of theatrical scripts. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15, 425-460.
52. Okuda, S. R., Runco, M. A., & Berger, D. E. (1991). Creativity and the finding and solving of real-world problems. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 9, 145-153.
53. Onkal, D., Yates, J. F., Simga-Mugan, C., & Oztin, S. (2003). Professional vs. amateur judgment accuracy: The case of foreign exchange rates. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 169-186.
54. OnPoint Marketing Resources: Case Studies. (n.d.). Retrieved September 2006 from http://www.onpointmarketing.com/resources.php
55. Osburn, H. K., & Mumford, M. D. (2006). Creativity and planning: Training interventions to develop creative problem solving skills. Creative Research Journal, 18, 173-190.
56. Pant, P. N., & Starbuck, W. H. (1990). Innocents in the forest: Forecasting and research methods. Journal of Management, 16, 433-460.
57. Patalano, A. L., & Seifert, C. M. (1997). Opportunistic planning: Being reminded of pending goals. Cognitive Psychology, 34, 1-36.
58. Perkins, D. N. (1992). The topography of invention. In R. J. Weber & D. N. Perkins (Eds.), Inventive minds: Creativity in technology (pp. 238-250). New York: Oxford University Press.
59. Redmond, M. R., Mumford, M. D., & Teach, R. J. (1993). Putting creativity to work: Leader influences on subordinate creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 120-151.
60. Reysen, S. (2005). Construction of a new scale: The Reysen likability scale. Social Behavior and Personality, 33, 201-208.
61. Rostan, S. M. (1994). Problem finding, problem solving, and cognitive controls: An empirical investigation of criticality acclaimed productivity. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 97-110.
62. Saucier, G. (2002). Orthogonal markers for orthogonal factors: The case of the big 5. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 1-31.
63. Scott, G. M., Lonergan, D. C., & Mumford, M. D. (2005). Conceptual combination: Alternative knowledge structures, alternative heuristics. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 79-98.
64. Sharma, A. (1999). Central dilemmas of managing innovation in large firms. California Management Review, 41, 65-85.
65. Vincent, P. H., Decker, B. P., & Mumford, M. D. (2002). Divergent thinking, intelligence, and expertise: A test of alternative models. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 163-178.
66. Ward, T. B., Patterson, M. T., & Sifonis, C. M. (2004). The role of specificity and abstraction in creative idea generation. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 1-10.
67. Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Finke, R. A. (1999). Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 189-213). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
68. Weintroff, R. H. (1992). The synthesis of diamonds. In R. J. Weber & D. N. Perkins (Eds.), Inventive minds: Creativity in technology (pp. 154-165). New York: Oxford University Press.
69. Weisberg, R.W. (2006). Expertise and reason in creative thinking: Evidence from case studies and the laboratory. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity and reason in cognitive development (pp. 7-42). New York: Cambridge University Press.
70. Wilson, R. C., Guilford, J. P., Christensen, P. R., & Lewis, D. J. (1954). A factor-analytic study of creative thinking abilities. Psychometrica, 19, 297-311.
71. Xiao, Y., Milgram, P., & Doyle, D. J. (1997). Planning behavior and its functional role in interactions with complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 27, 313-325.