Right- and left-hand performance on the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure: A preliminary study in non-clinical sample of right handed people

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 314-317

  Yamashita, Hikari ^a  

^a EHIME UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Intermanual differences; Neuropsychological tests; Rey Osterrieth Complex Figure Test; Visuospatial memory

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952819129     PISSN: 08876177     EISSN: 18735843     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acq019     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Baddeley, A. D. (2001). Is working memory still working? American Psychologist, 56, 851-864.
2. Budd, M. A., Houtz, A., & Lambert, P. (2008). Comparison of nondominant- and dominant-hand performances on the Copy portion of the Rey Complex Figure Test (RCFT). Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 30, 380-386.
3. Hatta, T., & Hotta, C. (2008). Which inventory should be used to assess Japanese handedness?: Comparison between Edinburgh and H. N. handedness inventories. Journal of Human Environmental Studies, 6, 245-248.
4. Hatta, T., & Nakatsuka, A. (1975). Hatta-Nakatsuka handedness text. In S. Ohno (Ed.). Festschrift to Prof. Ohnishi K, (pp. 224-247). Osaka: Osaka City University Press.
5. Hubley, A. M., & Jassal, S. (2006). Comparability of the Rey-Osterrieth and Modified Taylor Complex Figures using total scores, completion times, and construct validation. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28, 1482-1497.
6. Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Lindenberger, U., Marsiske, M., & Baltes, P. B. (2000). Memorizing while walking: Increase in dual-task costs from young adulthood to old age. Psychology and Aging, 15, 417-436.
8. Lövdén, M., Schaefer, S., Pohlmeyer, A. E., & Lindenberger, U. (2008).Walking variability and working-memory load in aging: A dual-process account relating cognitive control to motor control performance. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 63, 121-128.
9. McCulloch, K. (2007). Attention and dual-task conditions: Physical therapy implications for individuals with acquired brain injury. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy, 31, 104-118.
10. Meyers, J. E., & Meyers, K. R. (1995). Rey Complex Figure Test and Recognition Trial: professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.
11. Osterrieth, P. A. (1944). Le test de copie d'une figure complex: Contributiona l'etude de la perception et de la memoire. Archives de Psychologie, 30, 286-356.
12. Rey, A. (1941). L'examen psychologique dans les cas d'encephalopathie traumatique. Archives de Psychologie, 28, 286-340.
13. Spreen, O., & Strauss, E. (1998). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administrator, norms, and commentary (2nd ed.). New York: University Press.
14. Strenge, H., & Niederberger, U. (2008). Unidirectional interference in use of nondominant hand during concurrent Grooved Pegboard and random number generation tasks. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 106, 763-774.
15. Voelcker-Rehage, C., Stronge, A. J., & Alberts, J. L. (2006). Age-related differences in working memory and force control under dual-task conditions. Neuropsychology, Development, and Cognition. Section B, Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 13, 366-384.
16. Yamashita, H. (2002). Drawing abilities of the left hand in normal right-hander: Some implications for the analysis of constructional impairment. Sogo Rihabiriteshon, 30, 173-178.
17. Zacharias, S., & Kirk, A. (1998). Drawing with the non-dominant hand: Implications for the study of construction. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 25, 306-309.