Regimes of information: Land use, management, and policy

Information Society

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 328-343

  Ekbia, Hamid R ^a   Evans, Tom P ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision making; Forests; Information theory; Land use; Pragmatism; Situations

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952816185     PISSN: 01972243     EISSN: 10876537     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01972240903212789     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Boltanski, L., and L. Th́evenot 2006. On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2. Buckland, M. 1991. Information and information systems: New directions in information management. NewYork: Greenwood Publishing Group.
3. Couclelis, H., and R. Golledge 1983. Analytical research, positivism, and behavioral geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 73(3):331-339.
4. Cúellar, N., and S. Kandel 2006. The Campesino to Campesino Program of Siuna, Nicaragua. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
5. Davis, M. B. 1993. Old growth in the East: A survey. Richmond, VT: The Cenozoic Society.
6. Dewey, J. 1931. Context and thought. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7. Dewey, J. 1991. Logic: The theory of inquiry. John Dewey: The latter works, 1925-1953, ed. A. Boydston. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
8. Durkheim, E. 1970. Cours de science sociale. La Science sociale et l'action, ed. J. C. Filloux. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
9. Ekbia, H. R., and A. G. Maguitman. 2001. Context and relevance: A pragmatic approach. In Lecture notes in computer science (LNAI 2116), eds. V. Akman, P. Bouquet, R. Thomason, and R. Young, pp. 156-169. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
10. Ekbia, H. R., and R. Kling. 2003. Power in knowledge management in late modern times. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Academy of Management, Seattle, WA.
11. Evans, T. P., G. Green, and L. A. Carlson. 2001. Multi-scale analysis of landcover composition and landscape management of public and private lands in Indiana. In Remote sensing and GIS applications in biogeography and ecology, eds. A. Millington, S. Walsh, and P. Osborne, pp. 271-287. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
12. Evans, T. P., and H. Kelley. 2004. Multi-scale analysis of a household level agent-based model of landcover change. Journal of Environmental Management 72(1-2):57-72.
13. Evans, T. P., and H. Kelley. 2008. Assessing the transition from deforestation to forest regrowth with an agent-based model of land cover change for south-central Indiana (USA). Geoforum 39(2):819-832.
14. Fearnside, P. M. 1993. Deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia: The effect of population and land tenure. Ambio 22(8):537-545.
15. Garfinkel, H. 2008. Toward a sociological theory of information. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
16. Geist, H. J., and E. F. Lambin. 2005. Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. In The Earthscan reader in forestry and development, ed. J. Sayer, pp. 239-263. London: James and James.
17. Jagd, S. 2007. Economics of convention and new economic sociology: Mutual inspiration and dialogue. Current Sociology 55:75-91.
18. Janssen, M. A., Ö. Bodin, J. M. Anderies, T. Elmqvist, H. Ernston, R. R. J. McAllister, P. Olsson, and P. Ryan. 2006. Toward a network perspective of the study of resilience in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 11(1):15.
19. Kellog, R. S. 1909. The timber supply of the United States (Forest resource circular no. 166). Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.
20. Koontz, T. M. 2001. Money talks? But to whom? Financial versus nonmonetary motivations in land use decisions. Society & Natural Resources 14(1):51-65.
21. Lindsey, A. A. 1997. Walking in wilderness. In The natural heritage of Indiana, pp. 113-123. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
22. Lindsey, A. A.,W. B. Crankshaw, and S. A. Qadir. 1965. Soil relations and distribution map of the vegetation of presettlement Indiana. Botanical Gazette 126(3):155.
23. Mather, A. S. 1992. The forest transition. Area 24(4):367-379.
24. Mather, A. S., and C. L. Needle. 1998. The forest transition: A theoretical basis. Area 30(2):117-124.
25. Meadows, A. J., M. Gordon, and A. Singleton. 1984. Dictionary of computing and new information technology. London: Kogan Page.
26. Nelson, J. 1998. Indiana's forests: Past, present, and future. Woodland Steward 7(3):1007-1096.
27. Nielsen, L., and C. Heffernan 2006. New tools to connect people and places: The impact of ICTs on learning among resource poor farmers in Bolivia. Journal of International Development 18(6):889-900.
28. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Ostrom, E. 2002. The drama of the commons. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
30. Rindfuss, Ronald R., Barbara Entwisle, Stephen J. Walsh, Li An, Nathan Badenoch, Daniel G. Brown, Peter Deadman, Tom P. Evans, Jefferson Fox, Jacqueline Geoghegan, Myron Gutmann, Maggi Kelly,Marc Linderman, Jianguo Liu, George P.Malanson, Carlos F. Mena, Joseph P.Messina, Emilio F. Moran, Dawn C. Parker, William Parton, Pramote Prasartkul, Derek T. Robinson, Yothin Sawangdee, Leah K. VanWey, and Peter H. Verburg. 2008. Land use change: Complexity and comparisons. Journal of Land Use Science 3(1):1-10.
31. Rudel, T. K., O. T. Coomes, E. Moran, F. Achard, A. Angelsen, J. Xu, and E. Lambin. 2005. Forest transitions: Towards a global understanding of land use change. Global Environmental Change 15(1):23-31.
32. Rushton, G. 1979. On behavioral and perception geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 69(3):463-464.
33. Scherr, S. J., A. White, and D. Kaimowitch. 2004. A new agenda for forest conservation and poverty reduction. Washington DC: Forest Trends.
34. Théevenot, L. 2007. The plurality of cognitive formats and engagements: Moving between the familiar and the public. European Journal of Social Theory 10(3):413-427.
35. Uliwa, P., and D. Fischer. 2004. Assessment of Tanzania's producer organizations experience and environment.Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: U.S. Agency for International Development, Tanzania Economic Growth Office.
36. Wagner, P. 1994. Dispute, uncertainty and institution in recent French debates. Journal of Political Philosophy 2(3):270-289.
37. World Bank. 2008. World development report: Agriculture for development. Washington, DC: World Bank.