Marine electrical resistivity imaging of submarine groundwater discharge: Sensitivity analysis and application in Waquoit Bay, Massachusetts, USA;Magerie de la résistivité électrique de sorties d'eaux souterraines en milieu marin: Analyse de sensibilité et mise en œuvre dans la baie de Waquoit, Massachusetts, Etats-Unis d'Amérique

Hydrogeology Journal

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 173-185

  Henderson, Rory D ^a,b   Day Lewis, Frederick D ^a   Abarca, Elena ^c   Harvey, Charles F ^c   Karam, Hanan N ^c   Liu, Lanbo ^b   Lane Jr , John W ^a  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^c Massachusetts Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Coastal aquifers; Electrical resistivity imaging; Equipment field techniques; Groundwater surface water relations; Submarine groundwater discharge; USA

Indexed keywords

COASTAL AQUIFER; DISCHARGE; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY; GROUNDWATER FLOW; GROUNDWATER-SURFACE WATER INTERACTION; HYDROLOGY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; SALINITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TIDAL CYCLE;

MASSACHUSETTS; UNITED STATES; WAQUOIT BAY;

EID: 77952813109     PISSN: 14312174     EISSN: 14350157     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-009-0498-z     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Archie GE (1942) The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoirs characteristics. J Petrol Technol 5: 1-8.
2. Ataie-Ashtiani B, Volker RE, Lockington DA (1999) Tidal effects on sea water intrusion in unconfined aquifers. J Hydrol 216(1-2): 17-31.
3. Barlow PM (2003) Ground water in freshwater-saltwater environments of the Atlantic Coast, US Geol Surv Circ 1262: 121.
4. Belaval M, Lane JW Jr, Lesmes DP, Kineke GC (2003) Continuous-resistivity profiling for coastal groundwater investigations: three case studies. In: Proceedings to the Symposium in the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems (SAGEEP), 6-10 April 2003, San Antonio, TX, Environmental and Engineering Geophysics Society, Denver, CO, 14 pp. http://water. usgs. gov/ogw/bgas/publications/SAGEEP03_Belaval/SAGEEP03_Belaval. pdf. Cited 14 July 2009.
5. Binley A, Kemna A (2005) Electrical methods. In: Rubin Y, Hubbard S (eds) Hydrogeophysics. Springer, New York, pp 129-156.
6. Binley A, Shaw B, Henry-Poulter S (1996) Flow pathways in porous media: electrical resistance tomography and dye staining image verification. Meas Sci Technol 7: 384-390.
7. Bratton FJ, Bohlke JK, Manheim FT, Krantz DE (2004) Ground water beneath coastal bays of the Delmarva Peninsula: ages and nutrients. Ground Water 42(7): 1021-1034.
8. Burnett WC, Bokuniewicz H, Huettel M, Moore WS, Taniguchi M (2003) Groundwater and pore water inputs to the coastal zone. Biogeochemistry 66: 3-33.
9. Buxton HT, Smolensky DA (1999) Simulation of the effects of development of the ground-water flow system of Long Island, New York. US Geol Surv Water Resour Invest Rep 98-4069.
10. Cambareri TC, Eichner EM (1998) Watershed delineation and ground water discharge to a coastal embayment. Ground Water 36(4): 626-634.
11. Colman JA, Masterson JP, Pabich WJ, Walter DA (2004) Effects of aquifer travel time on nitrogen transport to a coastal embayment. Ground Water 42(7): 1069-1078.
12. Constable SC, Parker RL, Constable CG (1987) Occam's inversion: a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data. Geophysics 52(3): 289-300.
13. Cooper HH (1959) A hypothesis concerning the dynamic balance of fresh water and salt water in a coastal aquifer. J Geophys Res 64(4): 461-467.
14. Dahlin T, Loke MH (1998) Resolution of 2D Wenner resistivity imaging as assessed by numerical modeling. J Appl Geophys (38): 237-249.
15. Daily W, Ramirez A, Binley A, LaBrecque D (2004) Electrical resistance tomography. The Leading Edge 23(5): 438-442.
16. Day-Lewis FD, Lane JW (2004) Assessing the resolution-dependent utility of tomograms for geostatistics. Geophys Res Lett 31(7).
17. Day-Lewis FD, Harris JM, Gorelick SM (2002) Time-lapse inversion of crosswell radar data. Geophysics 67(6): 1740-1752.
18. Day-Lewis FD, Singha K, Binley AM (2005) Applying petrophysical models to radar travel time and electrical resistivity tomograms: resolution-dependent limitations. J Geophys Res 110(B08206): 17. doi: 10. 1029/2004JB005369.
19. Day-Lewis FD, White EA, Johnson CD, Lane JW Jr, Belaval M (2006) Continuous resistivity profiling to delineate submarine groundwater discharge-examples and limitations. The Leading Edge 25(6): 724-728.
20. Day-Lewis FD, Chen Y, Singha K (2007) Moment inference from tomograms. Geophys Res Lett 34, L22404. doi: 10. 1029/2007GL031621.
21. deGroot-Hedlin C, Constable S (1990) Occam's inversion to generate smooth, two dimensional models from magnetotelluric data. Geophysics 55(12): 1613-1624.
22. Foyle AM, Henry VJ, Alexander CR (2002) Mapping the threat of seawater intrusion in a regional coastal aquifer-aquitard system in the southeastern United States. Environ Geol (43): 151-159.
23. Freeze RA, Cherry JA (1979) Groundwater. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 604 pp.
24. Frohlich RK, Urish DW (2002) The use of geoelectrics and test wells for the assessment of groundwater quality of a coastal industrial site. J Appl Geophys 50(3): 261-278.
25. Hem JD (1970) Study and interpretation of chemical characteristics of natural water (2nd edn.). US Geol Surv Water Suppl Pap 1473: 363.
26. Henderson RD, Day-Lewis FD, Harvey CF (2009) Investigation of aquifer-estuary interaction using wavelet analysis of fiber-optic temperature data. Geophys Res Lett 36, L06403. doi: 10. 1029/2008GL036926.
27. Hidalgo JJ, Slooten LJ, Medina A, Carrera J (2004) A Newton-Raphson based code for seawater intrusion modeling and parameter estimation. In: Araguás L, Custodio E, Manzano M (eds) Groundwater and saline intrusion. Selected papers from the 18th Salt Water Intrusion Meeting, Cartagena, Spain, May 2004, IGME, Madrid, pp 111-120.
28. Jeng DS, Li L, Barry DA (2001) Water wave driven seepage in marine sediments. Adv Water Resour 24: 1-10.
29. Johannes RE (1980) The ecological significance of the submarine discharge of groundwater. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 3: 365-373.
30. Kemna A, Binley A, Day-Lewis F, Englert A, Tezkan B, Vanderborght J, Vereecken H, Winship P (2006) Solute transport processes. In: Vereecken H, Binley A, Cassiani G, Revil A, Titov K (eds) Applied hydrogeophysics, NATO Science Series IV: earth and environmental sciences, vol 71, Springer, Heidelberg, pp 117-159.
31. Kohout FA (1960) Cyclic flow of salt water in the Biscayne Aquifer of southeastern Florida. J Geophys Res 65(7): 2133-2141.
32. Krantz DE, Manheim FT, Bratton JF, Phelan DJ (2004) Hydrogeoligic setting and ground water flow beneath a section of Indian River Bay, Delaware. Ground Water (42): 1035-1051.
33. LaCombe PJ, Carleton GB (2002) Hydrogeologic framework, availability of water supplies, and saltwater intrusion, Cape May County, New Jersey. US Geol Surv Sci Invest Rep 01-4246.
34. Liu L (2002) Saline water intrusion. Article 1. 7. 3. 5 of the Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), sponsored by the United Nations Education, Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO), EOLSS, Oxford, UK.
35. Loke MH, Lane JW Jr (2004) Inversion of data from electrical resistivity imaging surveys in water-covered areas. Explor Geophys (35): 266-271.
36. Manheim FT, Krantz DE, Bratton JF (2004) Studying ground water under Delmarva coastal bays using electrical resistivity. Ground Water 42(7): 1052-1068.
37. Marksammer AJ, Person MA, Day-Lewis FD, Lane JW Jr, Cohen D, Dugan B, Kooi H, Willett M (2007) Integrating geophysical, hydrochemical and hydrologic data to understand the freshwater resources on Nantucket Island, Massachusetts. In: Hyndman DW, Day-Lewis FD, Singha K (eds) Surface hydrology: data integration for properties and processes. Geophysical Monograph Series 171, AGU, Washington, DC.
38. Menke W (1984) Geophysical data analysis: discrete inverse theory. Academic, Orlando, FL, 289 pp.
39. Michael HA, Lubetsky JS, Harvey CF (2003) Characterizing submarine groundwater discharge: a seepage meter study in Waquoit Bay, Massachusetts. Geophys Res Lett 30(6), 1297.
40. Michael HA, Mulligan AE, Harvey CF (2005) Seasonal oscillations in water exchange between aquifers and the coastal ocean. Nature 436: 1145-1148.
41. Miller DC, Ullman WJ (2004) Ecological consequences of ground water discharge to Delaware Bay, United States. Ground Water 42(7): 959-970.
42. Miller CR, Routh PS (2007) Resolution analysis of geophysical images: comparison between point spread function and region of data influence measures. Geophys Prospect (55): 835-852.
43. Moore WS (1999) The subterranean estuary: a reaction zone of ground water and sea water. Mar Chem 65: 111-125.
44. Nguyen F, Kemna A, Antonsson A, Engesgaard P, Ogilvy R (2009) Characterization of seawater intrusions using 2D electrical tomography. Near Surf Geophys. doi: 10. 3997/1873-0604. 2009025.
45. Oldale RN (1981) Pleistocene stratigraphy of Nantucket, Martha's Vineyard, the Elizabeth Islands, and Cape Cod, Massachusetts. In: Larson GJ, Stone BD (eds) Late Wisconsinan glaciation of New England. Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque, IA.
46. Reilly TE, Goodman AS (1985) Quantitative analysis of saltwater-freshwater relationships in groundwater systems: a historical perspective. J Hydrol (80): 125-160.
47. Robinson C, Gibbes B, Li L (2006) Driving mechanisms for groundwater flow and salt transport in a subterranean estuary. Geophys Res Lett 33(3): L03402. 1-L03402. 4. doi: 10. 1029/2005GL025247.
48. Schultz G (2002) Hydrologic and geophysical characterization of spatial and temporal variations in coastal aquifer systems. PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA, 355 pp.
49. Schultz G, Ruppel C, Fulton P (2007) Integrating hydrologic and geophysical data to constrain coastal surficial aquifer processes at multiple spatial and temporal scales. In: Hyndman DW, Day-Lewis FD, Singha K (eds) Subsurface hydrology: data integration for properties and processes. Geophysical Monograph Series 171, AGU, Washington, DC, pp 161-182. doi: 10. 1029/171GM13.
50. Shum KT (1992) Wave-induced advective transport below a rippled water-sediment interface. J Geophys Res 97(C1): 789-808.
51. Simmons GM (1992) Importance of submarine groundwater discharge and seawater cycling to material flux across sediment/water interfaces in marine environments. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 84: 173-184.
52. Slater LD, Sandberg SK (2000) Resistivity and induced polarization of salt transport under natural hydraulic gradients. Geophysics 65(2): 408-420.
53. Slomp CP, van Cappellen P (2004) Nutrient inputs to the coastal ocean through submarine groundwater discharge: controls and potential impact. J Hydrol 295: 64-86.
54. Smith CG, Cable JE, Martin JB (2008) Episodic high intensity mixing events in a subterranean estuary: effects of tropical cyclones. Limnol Oceanogr 53(2): 666-674.
55. Swarzenski PW, Burnett WC, Greenwood WJ, Herut B, Peterson R, Dimova N, Shalem Y, Yechieli Y, Weinstein Y (2006) Combined time-series resistivity and geochemical tracer to examine submarine groundwater discharge at Dor Beach, Israel. Geophys Res Lett 33, L24405.
56. Swarzenski PW, Simonds FW, Paulson AJ, Kruse S, Reich C (2007) Geochemical and geophysical examination of submarine groundwater discharge and associated nutrient loading estimates into Lynch Cove, Hood Canal, WA. Environ Sci Technol 41(20): 7022-7029.
57. Taniguchi M (2002) Tidal effects on submarine groundwater discharge into the ocean. Geophys Res Lett 29(12), 1561. doi: 10. 1029/2002GL014987.
58. Taniguchi M, Ishitobi T, Shimada J (2006) Dynamics of submarine groundwater discharge and fresh-water-seawater interface. J Geophys Res 111, C01008, 9 pp.
59. Taniguchi M, Tomotoshi I, Burnett WC, Wattayakorn G (2007) Evaluating ground water-sea water interactions via resistivity and seepage meters. Ground Water 45(6): 729-735.
60. Telford WM, Geldart LP, Sheriff RE, Keys DA (1990) Applied geophysics. Cambridge University Press, 2nd edn., Cambridge, 860 pp.
61. Urish DW, McKenna TE (2004) Tidal effects on ground water discharge through a sandy marine beach. Ground Water 42(7): 971-982.
62. Xu SZ, Duan BC, Zang DH (2000) Selection of the wavenumbers k using an optimization method for the inverse Fourier transform in 2. 5D electrical modeling. Geophys Prosp 48: 789-796.