The threshold force required for femoral impaction grafting in revision hip surgery: A preliminary study in sow femurs

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 81, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 303-307

  Flannery, Olivia M ^a,b,c   Britton, John R ^a   O'reilly, Peter ^a   Mahony, Nicholas ^a   Prendergast, Patrick J ^a   Kenny, Paddy J ^b,c  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b CAPPAGH NATIONAL ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

^c Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE GRAFT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMUR FRACTURE; FORCE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; MATERIALS TESTING; NONHUMAN; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; SOW (SWINE);

ADULT; ANIMALS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE CEMENTS; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; FEMORAL FRACTURES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; SWINE;

EID: 77952790313     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2010.480936     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bagger Y Z, Tanko L B, Alexandersen P, Hansen H B, Qin G, Christiansen, C. The long-term predictive value of bone mineral density measurements for fracture risk is independent of the site of measurement and the age at diagnosis: results from the prospective epidemiology risk factors study. Osteoporos Int 2006; 17 (3): 471-477
2. Dabestani M. In vitro strain measurement in bone. In: Strain measurement in biomechanics, 4th ed. (Eds Miles A W and Tanner K E). London: Chapman & Hall. 1992: 58-69.
3. Eldridge J D J, Smith E J, Hubble M J, Whitehouse S L, Learmonth I D. Massive early subsidence following femoral impaction grafting. J Arthroplasty 1997; 12: 535-540
4. Flugsrud G B, Ovre S, Grogaard B, Nordsletten L. Cemented femoral impaction bone grafting for severe osteolysis in revision hip arthroplasty. Good results at 4-year follow-up of 10 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2000; 120: 386-389
5. Gie G A, Linder L, Ling R S M, Simon J-P, Slooff T J J H, Timperley A J. Contained morselized allograft in revision total hip arthroplasty. Surgical technique. Orthop Clin North Am 1993a; 24: 717-724
6. Gie G A, Linder L, Ling R S M, Simon J-P, Slooff T J J H, Timperley A J. Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1993b; 75: 14-21. (Pubitemid 23052407)
7. Höstner J, Hultmark P, Kärrholm, Malchau H, Tveit M. Impaction technique and graft treatment in revisions of the femoral component. Laboratory studies and clinical validation. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16: 76-82.
8. Kligman M, Rotem A, Roffman M. Cancellous and cortical morselized allograft in revision total hip replacement: A biomechanical study of implant stability. J Biomech 2003; 36: 797-802. (Pubitemid 36555377)
9. Knight J L, Helming C. Collarless polished tapered impaction grafting of the femur during revision total hip arthroplasty. Pitfalls of the surgical technique and follow-up in 31 cases. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15: 159-165
10. Leopold S S, Berger R A, Rosenberg A G, Jacobs J J, Quigley L A, Galante J O. Impaction allografting with cement for revision of the femoral component. A minimum four-year follow-up study with use of a precoated femoral stem. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1999; 81: 1080-1092
11. Linder L. Cancellous impaction grafting in the human femur. Histological and radiographic observation in 6 autopsy femurs and 8 biopsies. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71: 543-552
12. Ling R S M, Timperley A J, Linder L. Histology of cancellous impaction grafting in the femur. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1993; 75: 693-696
13. Malkani L, Voor J, Fee A, Bates S. Femoral component revision using impacted morsellised cancellous graft. A biomechanical study of implant stability. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1996; 78: 973-978
14. Masterson L, Masri A, Duncan P. The cement mantle in the Exeter impaction allografting technique. A cause for concern. J Arthroplasty 1997; 12: 759-764
15. Meek R M, Garbuz D S, Masri B A, Greidanus N V, Duncan C P. Intraoperative fracture of the femur in revision total hip arthroplasty with a diaphyseal fitting stem. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2004; 86 (3): 480-485
16. Ornstein E, Atroshi I, Franzen H, Johnsson R, Sandquist P, Sundberg M. Early complications after one hundred and forty-four consecutive hip revisions with impacted morselized allograft bone and cement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2002; 84 (8): 1323-1328 (Pubitemid 35407575)
17. Pekkarinen J, Alho A, Lepisto J, Ylikoski M, Ylinen P, Paavilainen. Impaction bone grafting in revision hip surgery. A high incidence of complications. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2000; 82 (1): 103-107
18. Schreurs B W, Buma P, Huiskes R, Slagter J L, Slooff T J J H. Morsellized allografts for fixation of the hip prosthesis femoral component. A mechanical and histological study in the goat. Acta Orthop Scand 1994; 65: 267-275
19. Schreurs B W, Gardeniers J W M, Slooff T J J H. Acetabular reconstruction with bone impaction grafting: 20 years of experience. AAOS Instructional Course Lectures 2001; 50: 221-228
20. Schreurs B W, Arts J J C, Verdonschot N, Buma P, Slooff T J J H, Gardeniers J W M. Femoral component revision with used of impacted bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2006; 88: 259-274
21. Slooff T J J H, Huiskes R, van Horn J, Lemmens A J. Bone grafting in total hip replacement for Acetabular protrusion. Acta Orthop Scand 1984; 55: 593-596
22. Tokgozoglu A M, Aydin M, Atilla B, Caner B. Scintigraphic evaluation of impaction grafting for total hip revision. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2000; 120: 416-419
23. Toms A D, Barker R L, Jones R S, Kuiper J H. Impaction bone-grafting in revision joint replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2004; 86 (9): 2050-2060
24. Ullmark G, Linder L. Histology of the femur after cancellous impaction grafting using a Charnley prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1998; 117: 170-172
25. van Biezen F C, ten Have B L, Verhaar J A N. Impaction bone-grafting of severely defective femora in revision total hip surgery. 21 hips followed for 41-85 months. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71: 135-142