Robotic vs. laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 125-131

  Markar, S R ^a   Karthikesalingam, A P ^b   Hagen, M E ^a   Talamini, M ^a   Horgan, S ^a   Wagner, O J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CHELSEA AND WESTMINSTER HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Laparoscopic; Nissen fundoplication; Robotic

Indexed keywords

HOSPITALS; LAPAROSCOPY;

CLINICAL OUTCOME; FUNDOPLICATION; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE; LAPAROSCOPIC; LITERATURE SEARCH; MEDLINE; META-ANALYSIS; NISSEN FUNDOPLICATION; OUTCOME MEASURES; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

ROBOTICS;

CLINICAL TRIAL; COCHRANE LIBRARY; COST; DYSPHAGIA; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; MORTALITY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; REOPERATION; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; STOMACH FUNDOPLICATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; COMPLICATION; DEGLUTITION DISORDERS; LAPAROSCOPY;

DEGLUTITION DISORDERS; FUNDOPLICATION; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77952782178     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.309     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Guidelines for Surgical Treatment of Gastresophageal Reflux Disease (GERD): SAGES Practice/Clinical Guidelines, revised edn, Publication No. 0022. 2001; http://www.SAGES.ORG (accessed 1 September 2009).
2. Peters MJ, Mukhtar A, Yunus RM, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104(6): 1548-1561.
3. Draaisma WA, Ruurda JP, Scheffer RCH, et al. Randomized clinical trial of standard laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 1351-1359. (Pubitemid 44736085)
4. Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, et al. Computerenhanced vs. standard laparoscopic antireflux surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2002; 6(1): 11-15.
5. Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Vertruyen M, et al. Evaluation of telesurgical (robotic) Nissen fundoplication. Surg Endosc 2001; 15(9): 918-923. (Pubitemid 32852839)
6. Hartmann J, Menenakos C, Ordemann J, et al. Long-term results of quality of life after standard laparoscopic vs. robot-assisted laparoscopic fundoplications for gastro-esophageal reflux disease. A comparative clinical trial. Int J Med Robot 2009; 5(1): 32-37.
7. Nakadi IE,Melot C, Closset J, et al. Evaluation of da Vinci Nissen fundoplication clinical results and cost minimization. World J Surg 2006; 30(6): 1050-1054. (Pubitemid 43824418)
8. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996; 17: 1-12. (Pubitemid 26120810)
9. Der Simonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177-188.
10. Morino M, Pellegrino L, Giaccone C, et al. Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 553-558.
11. Muller-Stich BP, Reiter MA, Wente MN, et al. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic fundoplication: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 1800-1805. (Pubitemid 47404117)