Coherence and calibration: Comments on subjectivity and "objectivity" in Bayesian analysis (Comment on articles by Berger and by Goldstein)

Bayesian Analysis

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 423-428

  Draper, David ^a  

^a University of California Santa Cruz   (United States)

Author keywords

Meta analysis; Out of sample predictive calibration

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952771998     PISSN: 19360975     EISSN: 19316690     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1214/06-BA116B     Document Type: Note

References (7)

1. Boole, G. 1854. An Investigation Into the Laws of Thought. London: MacMillan. 426
2. Browne, W. and D. Draper. 2006. A comparison of Bayesian and likelihood-based methods for fitting multilevel models (with discussion). Bayesian Analysis this issue. 426
3. GREATgroup. 1992. Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of domiciliary thrombolysis by general practitioners: Grampian Region Early Anistreplase Trial. British Medical Journal 305: 548-553. 424
4. Leonhardt, D. 2001. Adding art to the rigor of statistical science. The New York Times (www.nytimes.com): 28 April 2001. 424
5. Morrison, L., P. R. Verbeek, A. McDonald, B. Sawadsky, and D. Cook. 2000. Mortality and prehospital thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association 283: 2686-2692. 425
6. Pocock, S. and D. Spiegelhalter. 1992. Domiciliary thrombolysis by general practitioners. British Medical Journal 305: 1015. 424
7. Venn, J. 1888. The Logic of Chance. 3rd ed. London: MacMillan. 426