A progressive search for a group ranking with robust conclusions on prudent orders

Group Decision and Negotiation

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 39-56

  Lamboray, Claude ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Compromise ranking; Prudent orders

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952741103     PISSN: 09262644     EISSN: 15729907     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10726-007-9102-x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Arrow K, Rayanud H (1986) Social choice and multicriterion decision-making, MIT Press.
2. Bernardo JJ (1977) An assignment approach to choosing R& D experiments. Decision Sci 8: 489-501.
3. Blin JM (1976) A linear assignement formulation for the multiattribute decision problem. Revue Française d'automatique, d'informatique et de recherche opérationelle 6: 21-32.
4. Borda JC (1784) Mémoire sur les élections au scrutin. Histoire de l'académie royale des sciences.
5. Bruggemann R, Halfon E, Welzl G, Voigt K, Steinberg CEW (2001) Applying the concept of partially ordered sets on ranking of near shore sediments by a battery of tests. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 4: 918-925.
6. Colson G (2000) The OR's prize winner and the software ARGOS: how a multijudge and multicriteria ranking GDSS helps a jury to attribute a scientific award. Comput Oper Res 27: 741-755.
7. Cook W, Seiford L (1978) Priority ranking and consensus formation. Manage Sci 24: 1721-1732.
8. Debord B (1987b) Axiomatisation de procédures d'agrégation de préférences. PhD Thesis, Université Scientifique et Médicale de Grenoble.
9. De Keyser W, Springael J (2002) Another way of looking at group decision making opens new perspectives. Technical Report 2002015, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Applied Economics.
10. Dias L, Clímaco J (2000) ELECTRE TRI for groups with imprecise information on parameter values. Group Decis Neg 9: 355-377.
11. Dias L, Clímaco J (2005) Dealing with imprecise information in group multicriteria decisions: a methodology and a GDSS architecture. Eur J Oper Res 160: 291-307.
12. Dias L, Tsoukiàs A (2004) On the constructive and other approaches in decision aiding. In: Antunes CH, Figueira J, Clímaco J. (eds.), Aide multicritére à décision: multiple criteria decision aiding, pp. 13-28, CCDRC/INESCC/FEUC.
13. Dushnik B, Miller E (1941) Partially ordered sets. Am J Math 63: 600-610.
14. Guénoche A (1996) Vainqueurs de Kemeny et tournois difficiles. Mathématique, Informatique et Sciences humaines 133: 57-65.
15. Jelassi T, Kersten G, Ziont S (1990) An introduction to group decision and negotiation support. In: Bana e Costa CA (ed), Readings in multiple criteria decision making, Springer Verlag, pp. 537-568.
16. Kemeny J (1959) Mathematics without numbers. Daedulus 88: 571-591.
17. Kohler G (1978) Choix multicritère et analyse algébrique de données ordinales. PhD Thesis, Université Scientifique et Médicale de Grenoble.
18. Lamboray C (2006) An axiomatic characterization of the prudent order preference function. Annales du Lamsade 6: 229-256.
19. Lamboray C (2007) Prudent ranking rules: theoretical contributions and applications. PhD thesis, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Université du Luxembourg.
20. Lansdowne Z (1996) Ordinal ranking methods for multicriterion decision making. Nav Res Logistics 43: 613-627.
21. Lansdowne Z (1997) Outranking methods for multicriterion decision-making: Arrow's and Raynaud's conjecture. Soc Choice Welfare 14: 125-128.
22. Roy B (1998) A missing link in operational research decision aiding: robustness analysis. Found Comput Decis Sci 23: 141-160.
23. Roy B, Bouyssou D (1993) Aide multicritère à la décision: méthodes et cas. Economica.
24. Slater P (1961) Inconsistencies in a schedule of paired comparisons. Biometrica 48: 303-312.
25. Tideman TN (1987) Independence of clones as criterion for voting rules. Soc Choice Welfare 4: 185-206.