La calidad del servicio de auditoría: Los auditores vistos por sus «clientes»

Revista Espanola de Financiacion y Contabilidad

Volumn 28, Issue 102, 1999, Pages 1005-1041

  Antonia Garcia M ^a   Garrido, Pascual ^b   Vico, Antonio ^c   Moizer, Peter ^d   Humphrey, Christopher ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALICANTE   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITAT JAUME I   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952735816     PISSN: 02102412     EISSN: 02102412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. AAKER, D. A., y DAY, G. S. [1990]: Marketing Research, Fourth edition, Wiley.
2. ANASTASI, A.; [1966]: Consumer behavior and the behavioral sciences, ed. S. H. Britt. John Wiley and sons, New York.
3. BAGRANOFF, N. A. [1990]: «The semantic differential: a prescription for use in accounting research», Journal of Accounting Literature, núm. 9, pp. 65-80.
4. BEATTIE, V., y FEARNLEY; S. [1994]: «The Changing Structure of the Market for Audit Services in the U. K. A Descriptive Study», British Accounting Review, diciembre, pp. 301-322.
5. BENSTON, G. J. [1985]: «The Market for Public Accounting Services: Demand, Supply and Regulation», Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, spring, pp. 33-79.
6. BERNSTEIN, D. [1984]: Company image and reality: A critique of corporation communications, Holt, Rienhart and Wilson, London.
7. CARCELLO, J.; HERMANSON, R., y.McGRATH, N. [1992]: «Audit Quality Attributes: The Perceptions of Audit Partners, Preparers, and Financial Statements Users», Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, núm. 1, pp. 1-15.
8. CHAN, P.; EZZAMEL, M, y GWILLIAM, D. [1993]: «Determinants of audit fees for quoted U. K. companies», Journal of Business, Finance & Accounting, 20, pp.765786.
9. CHRISTIANSEN, M., y LOFT, A. [1992]: «Big Players and Small Players: A Study of Increasing Concentration in the Danish Market for Audit Services», European Accounting Review, vol, 1, pp. 227-301.
10. CORONA ROMERO, E; GARCÍA BENAU, M. A.; Ruiz BARBADILLO, E., y VICO MARTÍNEZ, A. [1995]: «The Audit Market in Spain: An Analysis of the Top 250 Nonfinancial Companies», Comunicación presentada al 18.° Congreso de la European Accounting Association, Birmingham.
11. CRASWELL, A. T.; FRANCIS, J. R., y TAYLOR, S. L. [1995]: «Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations», Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol, 20, pp. 297-322.
12. DEANGELO, L. E. [1981a]: «Auditor Independence, "Lowballing", and Disclosure Regulation», Joournal of Accounting and Economics, pp. 113-127.
13. - [1981b]: «Auditor size and and audit quality», Journal of Accounting and Economics, december, pp. 183-199.
14. FLAMHOLTZ, E., y COOK, E. [1978]: «Connotative meaning and its role in accounting change: a field study», Accounting Organisations and Society, October, pp. 115-139.
15. FLINT, D. [1988]: Philosophy and Principles of Auditing: An Introduction, MacMillan.
16. FRANCIS, J. [1984]: «The Effect of Audit Firm Size on Audit Prices: A Study of the Australian Market», Journal of Accounting and Economics, august, pp. 133-151.
17. GARCÍA BENAU, M. A.; HUMPREY, C.; MOIZER, P., y TURLEY, S. [1993]: La Auditoría y sus Expectativas: Los Casos de España y el Reino Unido. Editado por el Instituto de Contabilidad y Auditoría de Cuentas.
18. GONZALO ANGULO, J. A., y TÚA PEREDA, J. [1987]: «La responsabilidad social del auditor», Técnica Contable, octubre, pp, 435-466.
19. HARIED, A. A. [1972]: «The semantic differential of financial statements.», Journal of Accounting Research, núm. 10-2, pp. 376-391.
20. - [1973]: «Measurement of meaning in financial reports», Journal of Accounting Research, spring, pp. 117-145.
21. HOOKS, KL. [1991]: «Professionalism and self Interest: A Critical View of the expectations gap», Critical perspectives on Accounting, pp. 109-136.
22. HOUGHTON, K. A. [1987a]: «True and Fair view: an empirucal study of connotative meaning», Accounting Organisations and Society, march, pp. 143-152.
23. - [1987b]: «The developement of meaning in accounting: an intertemporal study», Accounting and Finance, november, pp. 25-40
24. HOUGHTON, K. A., y MESSIER, W. F. [1990]: «The wording of audit reports: its impact on the meaning of the message communicated» en Accounting Research, improvements in communicating and monitoring, ed. S. R. Moriarity, University of Oldahoma.
25. ICAC [1997]: Boletín Oficial del Instituto de Contabilidad y Auditoría de Cuentas, núm. 30, Madrid.
26. KNAPP, M. C [1991]: «Factors thar Audit Committee Members Use as Surrogates for Audit Quality», Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, vol. 10, núm. 1, pp. 35-52
27. LARRIBA DÍAZ-ZORITA, A., y GONZALO ANGULO, J. A. [1996]: «La Responsabilidad Social del Auditor», Revista Técnica, núm. 9, 96, pp. 4-29.
28. LEE, T. [1994]: «Financial Reporting Quality Labels. The Social Construction of the Audit Profession and the Expectations Gap», Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, pp. 30-49.
29. MARTEN, K. U. [1997]: «Developments in Concentration on the German and European Audit Market», comunicación presentada al Worlcshop on Auditor Regulation in Europe del EIASM, Copenhagen.
30. MARTEN, K. U.,; MOIZER, P., y SCHMÖLLER, P. [1998]: «The Image of Audit Firms - empirical evidence from the German Audit Market - », comunicación presentada al XXI Congreso de la European Accounting Association. Antwerpen.
31. MAUTZ, R. K., y SHARAF, H. A. [1961]: The Philosophy of Auditing, American Accounting Association.
32. MINDAK, W. A. [1961]: «Fitting the semantic differential to the marketing problem», Journal of Marketing, núm. 25, april, pp. 28-33.
33. MOCK, T., y SAMMET, M. [1982]: «A multi-attribute model for audit evaluation», en Proceedings
34. MOIZER, P. [1997]: «Auditor Reputation: the International Empirical Evidence», International Journal of Auditing, vol. 1, núm. 1, pp. 61-74.
35. NERA [1992]: Competition in European Accounting, National Economic Research Associates, Laffertty Publications, Dublin.
36. OLIVER, B. L. [1974]: «The semantic differential: a device for measuring the interprofessional communication of selected accounting concept?;», Journal of Accounting Research , autumn, pp; 299-316.
37. ORTEGA MARTÍNEZ, E. [1992]: Manual de Investigación Comercial, Madrid, Pirámide.
38. OSGOOD, C.; SUCI, G. J., y TANNENBAUM, P. H. [1957]: The measurement of meaning. Urbana, University of Illinois Press.
39. PALMROSE, Z. [1986]: «Auditor Fees and Auditor Size: Further Evidence», Journal of Accounting Research, spring, pp. 97-110.
40. PONG, C., y WHITTINGTON, G. [1994]: «The Determinants of Audit Fees: Some Empirical Models», Jounal of Business Finance & Accounting, vol. 21, núm. 8, pp. 1071-11045
41. RAGHUNATAN, B.; LEWIS, B. L., y EVANS, J. H, [1987]: «An Operational Model of Auditor Independence», Working Paper, University of Pitsburgh.
42. ROSEN, D. L. [1983]: «Consumer perceptions of quality of generic grocery products: A comparison across product categories», Journal of Retailing, winter, pp. 64-80.
43. SHOCKLEY, R., y HOLT, R. [1983]: «A behavorial investigation of supplier differentiation in the market for audit services», Journal of Accounting Research, autumn, pp. 545-564.
44. SHROEDER, M. S.; SOLOMON, L, y VICKREY, D. [1986]: «Audit Quality: The Perceptions of Audit-Committee Chairpersons and Audit Partners», Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, vol. 5, núm. 2, pp. 86-94.
45. SIMON, D. T., y FRANCIS, J. R. [1988]: «The effects of auditor change on audit fees: Test of price cutting and price recovery», Accounting Review, 63, pp. 255-269.
46. SUCHER, P.; MOIZER, P., y ZAROVA, M. [1998]: «The Images of the Big Six audit firms in the Czech republic», comunicación presentada al.XXI Congreso de la European Accounting Association. Antwerpen.
47. UNIÓN EUROPEA [1996]: Libro Verde-Función, posición y responsabilidad civil del auditor legal en la Unión Eropea, 96/C 321/01, Diario Oficial de las Comunidades europeas, 28 octubre 1996.
48. WARMING-RASMUSSAN B. [1995]: «Quality Dimensions in Audit Services», comunicación presentada en el 18.° Congreso de la European Accounting Association, Birmingham.
49. WATTS, R. L., y ZIMMERMAN, J. L. [1983]: «Agency problems, auditing, and the theory of the firm: Some evidence», Journal of Law and Economics, October, pp. 613-633.
50. WILSON, R. G. [1983]: «Auditing: Perspectives from multiperson decision theory», Accounting Review, april, pp., 305-318.
51. WILLIAMS, D. D. [1988]: «The Potential Determinants of Auditor Change», Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, pp. 243-261
52. WILLINGHAM, J. J., y JACOBSON, P. D. [1985]: «A Research Response to the Dingell Hearings», The Auditor Reports, pp. 1-4.
53. WILLMOTT, H. C. [1986]: «Organizing the profession: A theorical and Historical Examination of the Development of the Major Accounting Bodies in U.K.», Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 11, pp. 555-582.