Discordancy or template-based recognition? Dissecting the cognitive basis of the rejection of foreign eggs in hosts of avian brood parasites

Journal of Experimental Biology

Volumn 213, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1976-1983

  Moskát, Csaba ^a   Bán, Miklós ^b   Székely, Tamás ^c   Komdeur, Jan ^d   Lucassen, Rim W G ^d   Van Boheemen, Lotte A ^d   Hauber, Mark E ^e  

^a Institute and Museum of Military History Budapest   (Hungary)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DEBRECEN   (Hungary)

^c University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^e CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Brood parasitism; Discordancy; Egg discrimination; Learning; Recognition template

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIRD; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; EGG; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; NESTING; PARASITOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BIRDS; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; EGGS; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTIONS; NESTING BEHAVIOR;

ACROCEPHALUS ARUNDINACEUS; AVES; CUCULUS CANORUS;

EID: 77952730426     PISSN: 00220949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.040394     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Alvarez, F. (1999). Attractive non-mimetic stimuli in cuckoo Cuculus canorus eggs. Ibis 141, 142-144.
2. Amundsen, T., Brobakken, P. T., Moksnes, A. and Røskaft, E. (2002). Rejection of common cuckoo Cuculus canorus eggs in relation to female age in the bluethroat Luscinia svecica. J. Avian Biol. 33, 366-370. (Pubitemid 36080423)
3. Antonov, A., Stokke, B. G., Moksnes, A. and Roskaft, E. (2009). Evidence for egg discrimination preceding failed rejection attempts in a small cuckoo host. Biol. Lett. 5, 166-171.
4. Aviles, J. M. (2008). Egg colour mimicry in the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus as revealed by modelling host retinal function. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 275, 2345-2352.
5. Aviles, J. M., Moskát, C., Bán, M., Hargitai, R. and Parejo, D. (2009). Common cuckoos (Cuculus canorus) do not rely on indicators of parental abilities when searching for host nests: the importance of host defences. Auk 126, 431-438.
6. Bensch, S. (1996). Female mating status and reproductive success in the great read warbler: is there a potential cost of polygyny that requires compensation? J. Anim. Ecol. 65, 283-296.
7. Boulinier, T., Danchin, E., Monnat, J.-Y., Doutrelant, C. and Cadiou, B. (1996). Timing of prospecting and the value of information in a colonial breeding bird. J. Avian Biol. 27, 252-256. (Pubitemid 27036730)
8. Braa, A. T., Moksnes, A. and Roskaft, E. (1992). Adaptations of bramblings and chaffinches towards parasitism by the common cuckoo. Anim. Behav. 43, 67-78.
9. Brooke, M. de L. and Davies, N. B. (1988). Egg mimicry by Cuckoos Cuculus canorus in relation to discrimination by hosts. Nature 335, 630-632.
10. Cassey, P., Ewen, J. G., Blackburn, T. M., Hauber, M. E., Vorobyev, M. and Marshall, N. J. (2008a). Eggshell colour does not predict measures of maternal investment in eggs of Turdus thrushes. Naturwissenschaften 95, 713-721.
11. Cassey, P., Honza, M., Grim, T. and Hauber, M. E. (2008b). The modelling of avian visual perception predicts behavioural rejection responses to foreign egg colours. Biol. Lett. 4, 515-517.
12. Cherry, M. I., Bennett, A. T. D. and Moskát, C. (2007a). Host intra-clutch variation, cuckoo egg matching and egg rejection by great reed warblers. Naturwissenschaften 94, 441-447.
13. Cherry, M. I., Bennett, A. T. D. and Moskát, C. (2007b). Do cuckoos choose nests of great reed warblers on the basis of host egg appearance? J. Evol. Biol. 20, 1218-1222.
14. Cramp, S. (ed.) (1992). The Birds of the Western Palearctic, Vol. 6. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
15. Davies, N. B. (2000). Cuckoos, Cowbirds and Other Cheats. London: T. A. D. Poyser.
16. Davies, N. B. and Brooke, M. de L. (1988). Cuckoos versus reed warblers: adaptations and counteradaptations. Anim. Behav. 36, 262-284.
17. Davies, N. B. and Brooke, M. de L. (1989). An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts. I. Host egg discrimination. J. Anim. Ecol. 58, 207-224.
18. Hauber, M. E. and Sherman, P. W. (2001). Self-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Trends. Neurosci. 24, 609-616. (Pubitemid 32913392)
19. Hauber, M. E., Yeh, P. J. and Roberts, J. O. L. (2004). Patterns and coevolutionary consequences of repeated brood parasitism. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 271, S317-S320.
20. Hauber, M. E., Moskát, C. and Bán, M. (2006). Experimental shift in hosts' acceptance threshold of inaccurate-mimic brood parasite eggs. Biol. Lett. 2, 177-180.
21. Helbig, A. J. and Scibold, I. (1999). Molecular phylogeny of Palearctic-African Acrocephalus and Hippolais warblers (Aves: Sylviidae). Mo. Phyi. Evol. 11, 246-260.
22. Higuchi, H. (1989). Responses of the bush warbler Cettia diphone to artificial eggs of Cuculus cuckoos in Japan. Ibis 131, 94-98.
23. Honza, M. and Moskát, C. (2005). Antiparasite behaviour in response to experimental brood parasitism in the great reed warbler: a comparison of single and multiple parasitism. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 42, 627-633. (Pubitemid 43095984)
24. Honza, M. and Moskát, C. (2008). Egg rejection behaviour in the great reed warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus): the effect of egg type. J. Ethol. 26, 389-395.
25. Honza, M. and Polaciková, L. (2008). Experimental reduction of ultraviolet wavelength reflected from parasitic eggs affects rejection behaviour in the blackcap Syivia atricapilla. J. Exp. Biol. 211, 2519-2523.
26. Honza, M., Taborsky, B., Taborsky, M., Teuschl, Y., Vogl, W., Moksnes, A. and Roskaft, E. (2002). Behaviour of female common cuckoos, Cuculus canorus, in the vicinity of host nests before and during egg laying: a radio telemetry study. Anim. Behav. 64, 861-868.
27. Honza, M., Procházka, P., Stokke, B. G., Moksnes, A., Roskaft, E., Capek, M., Jr and Mrlik, V. (2004). Are blackcaps current winners in the evolutionary struggle against the common cuckoo? J. Ethol. 22, 175-180.
28. Honza, M., Polaciková, L. and Procházka, P. (2007a). Ultraviolet and green parts of the colour spectrum affect egg rejection in the song thrush (Turdus philomelos). Biol. J Linn. Soc. 92, 269-276. (Pubitemid 47437790)
29. Honza, M., Pozgayová, M., Procházka, P. and Tkadlec, E. (2007b). Consistency in egg rejection behaviour: responses to repeated brood parasitism in the blackcap (Sylvia atricapilla). Ethology 113, 344-351.
30. Hoover, J. P., Yasukawa, K. and Hauber, M. E. (2006). Spatially and temporally structured avian brood parasitism affects the fitness benefits of hosts' rejection strategies. Anim. Behav. 72, 881-890. (Pubitemid 44399826)
31. Jamieson, I. G., McRae, S. B., Simmons, R. E. and Trewby, M. (2000). High rates of conspecific brood parasitism and egg rejection in coots and moorhens in ephemeral wetlands in Namibia. Auk 117, 250-255.
32. Kilner, R. M., Madden, J. R. and Hauber, M. E. (2004). Brood parasitic cowbird nestlings use host young to procure resources. Science 305, 877-879.
33. Krüger, O. (2007). Cuckoos, cowbirds and hosts: adaptations, trade-offs and constraints. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 362, 1873-1886.
34. Lahti, D. C. and Lahti, A. R. (2002). How precise is egg discrimination in weaverbirds? Anim. Behav. 63, 1135-1142.
35. Langmore, N. E., Stevens, M., Maurer, G. and Kilner, R. M. (2009). Are dark cuckoo eggs cryptic in host nests? Anim. Behav. 78, 461-468.
36. Leisler, B., Heindrich, P., Schulze-Hagen, K. and Wink, M. (1997). Taxonomy and phylogeny of reed warblers (genus Acrocephalus) based on mtDNA sequences and morphology. J. Om. 138, 469-496. (Pubitemid 127608688)
37. Lindholm, A. K. (1999). Brood parasitism by the cuckoo on patchy reed warbler population in Britain. J. Anim. Ecol. 68, 293-309.
38. Lotem, A., Nakamura, H. and Zahavi, A. (1992). Rejection of cuckoo eggs in relation to host age: a possible evolutionary equilibrium. Behav. Ecol. 3, 128-132. (Pubitemid 23398828)
39. Lotem, A., Nakamura, H. and Zahavi, A. (1995). Constraints on egg discrimination and cuckoo-host co-evolution. Anim. Behav. 49, 1185-1209.
40. Marchetti, K. (2000). Egg rejection in a passerine bird: size does matter. Anim. Behav. 59, 877-883.
41. Mark, D. and Stutchbury, B. J. (1994). Response of a forest-interior songbird to the threat of cowbird parasitism. Anim. Behav. 47, 275-280. (Pubitemid 2033984)
42. McLean, I. G. and Maloney, R. F. (1998). Brood parasitism, recognition, and response: the options. In Parasitic Birds and their Hosts: Studies in Coevolution (ed. S. I. Rothstein and S. K. Robinson), pp. 255-269. New York: Oxford University Press, Oxford.
43. Moksnes, A. (1992). Egg recognition in chaffinches and bramblings. Anim. Behav. 44, 993-995.
44. Moksnes, A., Roskaft, E., Braa, A. T., Korsnes, L., Lampe, H. M. and Pedersen, H. C. (1991). Behavioural responses of potential hosts towards artificial cuckoo eggs and dummies. Behaviour 116, 64-89.
45. Moskát, C. and Honza, M. (2000). Effect of nest and nest site characteristics on the risk of cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism in the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus. Ecography 22, 335-341. (Pubitemid 30416482)
46. Moskát, C. and Honza, M. (2002). European cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism and host's rejection behaviour in a heavily parasitized great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus population. Ibis 144, 614-622.
47. Moskát, C. and Hauber, M. E. (2007). Conflict between egg recognition and rejection decisions in common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) hosts. Anim. Cogn. 10, 377-386. (Pubitemid 47485291)
48. Moskát, C., Aviles, J. M., Bán, M., Hargitai, R. and Zölei, A. (2008a). Experimental support for the use of egg uniformity in parasite egg discrimination by cuckoo hosts. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62, 1885-1890.
49. Moskát, C., Hansson, B., Barabás, L., Bártol, I. and Karcza, Z. (2008b). Common cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism, antiparasite defence and gene flow in closely located populations of great reed warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus. J. Avian Biol. 39, 663-671.
50. Moskát, C., Székely, T., Cuthill, I. C. and Kisbenedek, T. (2008c). Hosts' responses to parasitic eggs: which cues elicit hosts' egg discrimination? Ethology 114, 186-194.
51. Moskát, C., Hauber, M. E., Aviles, J. M., Bán, M., Hargitai, R. and Honza, M. (2009). Increased host tolerance of multiple cuckoo eggs leads to higher fledging success of the brood parasite. Anim. Behav. 77, 1281-1290.
52. Nakamura, H., Kubota, S. and Suzuki, R. (1998). Coevolution between the common cuckoo and its major hosts in Japan. In Parasitic Birds and their Hosts: Studies in Coevolution (ed. S. I. Rothstein and S. K. Robinson), pp. 94-112. New York: Oxford University Press.
53. Palomino, J. J., Martin-Vivaldi, M., Soler, M. and Soler, J. J. (1998). Females are responsible for ejection of cuckoo eggs in the rufous bush robin. Anim. Behav. 56, 131-136. (Pubitemid 28352921)
54. Peer, B. D. and Sealy, S. G. (2001). Mechanism of egg recognition in the great-tailed grackle (Quiscalus mexicanus). Bird Behav. 14, 71-73.
55. Petrie, M., Pinxten, R. and Eens, M. (2009). Moorhens have an internal representation of their own eggs. Naturwissenschaften 96, 405-407.
56. Polaciková, L., Honza, M., Procházka, P., Topercer, J. and Stokke, B. G. (2007). Colour characteristics of the blunt egg pole: cues for recognition of parasitic eggs as revealed by reflectance spectrophotometry. Anim. Behav. 74, 419-427. (Pubitemid 47404517)
57. Pozgayová, M., Procházka, P. and Honza, M. (2009). Sex-specific defence behaviour against brood parasitism in a host with female-only incubation. Behav. Proc. 81, 34-38.
58. Procházka, P. and Honza, M. (2003). Do common whitethroats (Sylvia communis) discriminate against alien eggs? J. Ornithol. 144, 354-363. (Pubitemid 37054150)
59. Reeve, H. K. (1989). The evolution of conspecific acceptance thresholds. Am. Nat. 133, 407-435.
60. Rensch, B. (1925). Verhalten von Singvögeln bei Aenderung des Geleges. Ornithol. Monatschr. 33, 169-173.
61. Rodríguez-Gironés, M. A. and Lotem, A. (1999). How to detect a cuckoo egg: a signal-detection theory model for recognition and learning. Am. Nat. 153, 633-648.
62. Roskaft, E., Moksnes, A., Stokke, B. G., Moskát, C. and Honza, M. (2002). The spatial habitat structure of host populations explains the pattern of rejection behavior in hosts and parasitic adaptations in cuckoos. Behav. Ecol. 13, 163-168. (Pubitemid 34290269)
63. Rothstein, S. I. (1974). Mechanisms of avian egg recognition: possible learned and innate factors. Auk 91, 796-807.
64. Rothstein, S. I. (1975). Mechanisms of avian egg recognition: do birds know their own eggs? Anim. Behav. 23, 268-278.
65. Rothstein, S. I. (1978). Mechanisms of avian egg recognition: additional evidence for learned components. Anim. Behav. 26, 671-677.
66. Rothstein, S. I. (1982). Mechanisms of avian egg recognition: which egg parameters elicit responses by rejecter pecies? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 11, 229-239.
67. Safran, R. J. (2004). Adaptive site selection rules and variation in group size of barn swallows: individual decisions predict population patterns. Am. Nat. 164, 121-131.
68. Safran, R. J. and Vitousek, M. N. (2008). Evolutionary biology: arms races in the eye of the beholder. Curr. Biol. 18, R734-R736.
69. Schulze-Hagen, K., Stokke, B. G. and Birkhead, T. R. (2009). Reproductive biology of the European cuckoo Cuculus canorus: early insights, persistent errors and the acquisition of knowledge. J. Ornithol. 150, 1-16.
70. Sealy, S. G. (1995). Burial of cowbird eggs by parasitized yellow warblers: an empirical and experimental study. Anim. Behav. 49, 877-889.
71. Servedio, M. R. and Hauber, M. E. (2006). To eject or to abandon? Life history traits of hosts and parasites interact to influence the fitness payoffs of alternative anti-parasite strategies. J. Evoi. Biol. 19, 1585-1594. (Pubitemid 44237995)
72. Sherman, P. W., Reeve, H. K. and Pfennig, D. W. (1997). Recognition systems. In Behavioural Ecology, 4th edn (ed. J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies), pp. 69-96. Oxford: Blackwell.
73. Soler, J. J., Soler, M. and Møller, A. P. (2000). Host recognition of parasite eggs and the physical appearance of host eggs: the magpie and its brood parasite the great spotted cuckoo. Etología 8, 9-16.
74. Soler, M., Martin-Vivaldi, M. and Perez-Contreras, T. (2002). Identification of the sex responsible for recognition and the method of ejection of parasitic eggs in some potential common cuckoo hosts. Ethology 108, 1093-1101. (Pubitemid 36087372)
75. Stokke, B. G., Moksnes, A., Roskaft, E., Rudolfsen, G. and Honza, M. (1999). Rejection of artificial cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) eggs in relation to variation in egg appearance among reed warblers (Acrocephalus scirpaceus). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 266, 1483-1488. (Pubitemid 29366489)
76. Stokke, B. G., Honza, M., Moksnes, A., Roskaft, E. and Rudolfsen, G. (2002). Costs associated with recognition and rejection of parasitic eggs in two European passerines. Behaviour 139, 629-644. (Pubitemid 36374503)
77. Stokke, B. G., Moksnes, A. and Roskaft, E. (2005). The enigma of imperfect adaptations in hosts of avian brood parasities. Ornithol. Sci. 4, 17-29.
78. Stokke, B. G., Hafstad, I., Rudolfsen, G., Bargain, B., Beier, J., Campas, D. B., Dyrcz, A., Honza, M., Leisler, B., Pap, P. L. et al. (2007a). Host density predicts presence of cuckoo parasitism in reed warblers. Oikos 116, 913-922. (Pubitemid 46743917)
79. Stokke, B. G., Takasu, F., Moksnes, A. and Roskaft, E. (2007b). The importance of clutch characteristics for antiparasite adaptations in hosts of avain brood parasites. Evolution 61, 2212-2228. (Pubitemid 47340758)
80. Stokke, B. G., Hafstad, I., Rudolfsen, G., Moksnes, A., Moller, A. P., Roskaft, E. and Soler, M. (2008). Predictors of resistance to brood parasitism within and among reed warbler populations. Behav. Ecol. 19, 612-620. (Pubitemid 351847410)
81. Strausberger, B. M. and Rothstein, S. I. (2009). Parasitic cowbirds may defeat host defense by causing rejecters to misimprint on cowbird eggs. Behav. Ecoi. 20, 691-699.
82. Takasu, F. (1998). Modelling the arms race in avian brood parasitism. Evol. Ecol. 12, 969-987.
83. Török, J., Moskát, C., Michl, G. and Péczely, P. (2004). Common cuckoos (Cuculus canorus) lay eggs with larger yolk but not more testosterone than their great reed warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) hosts. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 16, 271-277.
84. Underwood, T. J. and Sealy, S. G. (2006). Parameters of brown-headed cowbird Molothrus ater egg discrimination in warbling vireos Vireo gilvus. J. Avian. Biol. 37, 457-466.
85. Victoria, J. K. (1972). Clutch characteristics and egg discriminative ability of the African weaverbird Ploceus cucullatus. Ibis 114, 367-376.
86. Vikan, J. R., Stokke, B. G., Fossey, F., Jackson, C., Huhta, E., Rutila, J., Moksnes, A. and Roskaft, E. (2009). Fixed rejection responses to single and multiple experimental parasitism in two Fringilla hosts of the common cuckoo. Ethology 115, 840-850.
87. Welbergen, J., Komdeur, J., Kats, R. and Berg, M. (2001). Egg discrimination in the Australian reed warbler (Acrocephalus australis): rejection response toward model and conspecific eggs depending on timing and mode of artificial parasitism. Behav. Ecol. 12, 8-15. (Pubitemid 32100790)
88. Wyllie, I. (1981). The Cuckoo. London: Batsford.