Identification and significance of sources of spatial variation in grapevine water status

Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 218-226

  Taylor, J A ^a   Acevedo Opazo, C ^b   Ojeda, H ^c   Tisseyre, B ^d  

^a UMR LISAH   (France)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE TALCA   (Chile)

^c Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

^d MONTPELLIER SUPAGRO   (France)

Author keywords

Pre dawn leaf water potential; Precision viticulture; Regression trees; Scalar variance; Stratified sampling

Indexed keywords

VITACEAE; VITIS;

EID: 77952699960     PISSN: 13227130     EISSN: 17550238     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2009.00066.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Acevedo-Opazo C, Tisseyre B, Guillaume S, Ojeda H. Test of NDVI information for a relevant vineyard zoning related to vine water status. Precision Agriculture '07. Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Precision Agriculture 2007, 547-554. Stafford JV, In, Ed., Wageningen Academic Press, The Netherlands, pp
2. Acevedo-Opazo C, Tisseyre B, Guillaume S, Ojeda H. The potential of high spatial resolution information to define within-vineyard zones related to vine water status. Precision Agriculture 2008a, 9:285-302.
3. Acevedo-Opazo C, Tisseyre B, Ojeda H, Ortega-Farías S, Guillaume S. Is it possible to assess the spatial variability of vine water status? Journal International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin 2008b, 42:203-219.
4. Carbonneau A. Irrigation, vignoble et produit de la vigne. Traité d'irrigation 1998, 257-298. Tiercelin J-R. In, Ed., Lavoisier Tec and Doc, Paris, pp
5. Carbonneau A, Deloire A, Costanza P. Leaf water potential meaning of different modalities of measurements. Journal International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin 2004, 38:15-19.
6. Choné X, Van Leeuwen C, Dubourdieu D, Gaudillere JP. Stem water potential is a sensitive indicator of grapevine water status. Annals of Botany 2001, 87:477-483.
7. Dry PR, Loveys BR. Factors influencing grapevine vigour and the potential for control with partial rootzone drying. Australian Journal Grape and Wine Research 1998, 4:140-148.
8. Guix-Hébrarda N, Voltz M, Trambouze W, Garnier F, Gaudillere JP, Lagacherie P. Influence of watertable depths on the variation of grapevine water status at the landscape scale. European Journal of Agronomy 2007, 27:187-196.
9. Guswa AJ. Soil-moisture limits on plant uptake: an upscaled relationship for water-limited ecosystems. Advances in Water Resources 2005, 28:543-552.
10. Katerji N, Hallaire M. Reference measures for use in studies of plant water needs. Agronomie 1984, 4:999-1008.
11. Katerji N, Daudet FA, Carbonneau A, Ollat N. Photosynthesis and transpiration studies with traditionally and lyre-trained vines. Vitis 1994, 33:197-203.
12. Koundouras S, Marinos V, Gkoulioti A, Kotseridis Y, Van Leeuwen C. Influence of vineyard location and vine water status on fruit maturation of non-irrigated cv. Agiorgitiko (Vitis vinifera L.): effects on wine phenolic and aroma components. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2006, 54:5077-5086.
13. Ojeda H. Qualitative irrigation of precision of the vineyard. Le Progrès Agricole et Viticole 2007, 124:133-141.
14. Ojeda H, Andary C, Kraeva E, Carbonneau A, Deloire A. Influence of pre-and postveraison water deficit on synthesis and concentration of skin phenolic compounds during berry growth of Vitis vinifera cv. Shiraz. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 2002, 53:261-267.
15. Ojeda H, Lebon E, Deis L, Vita F, Carbonneau A. Stomatal regulation of Mediterranean grapevine cultivars in drought situations of the southern of France. Proceedings of 14th GESCO Congress 2005b, 581-587. Shultz HR, In, Ed., Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Forschungsanstalt, Geisenheim, Germany, pp
16. Ojeda H, Carrillo N, Deis L, Tisseyre B, Heywang M, Carbonneau A. Precision viticulture and water status II: quantitative and qualitative performance of different within field zones, defined from water potential mapping. Proceedings of 14th GESCO Congress 2005a, 741-748. Shultz HR, In, Ed., Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Forschungsanstalt, Geisenheim, Germany, pp
17. Ollat N, Diakou-Verdin P, Carde JP, Barrieu F, Gaudillère JP, Moing A. Grape berry development: a review. Journal International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin 2002, 36:109-131.
18. Patakas A, Noitsakis B, Chouzouri A. Optimization of irrigation water use in grapevines using the relationship between transpiration and plant water status. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 2005, 106:253-259.
19. Pellegrino A, Gozé E, Lebon E, Wery J. A model-based diagnosis tool to evaluate the water stress experienced by grapevine in field sites. European Journal of Agronomy 2006, 25:49-59.
20. Pringle MJ, McBratney AB, Whelan BM, Taylor JA. A preliminary approach to assessing the opportunity for site-specific crop management in a field, using yield monitor data. Agricultural Systems 2003, 76:273-292.
21. Santiago JL, Gago P, Boso S, Alonso-Villaverde V, Martinez C. Influence of rootstock type on the agronomic characteristics of two grape (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars grown in the Northwestern Iberian Peninsula. Plant Production Science 2007, 10:473-477.
22. Scholander PF, Hammel HT, Bradstreet ED, Hemmingsen EA. Sap flow in vascular plants. Science 1965, 148:339-346.
23. Schultz HR. Differences in hydraulic architecture account for near-isohydric and anisohydric behaviour of two field-grown Vitis vinifera L. cultivars during drought. Plant, Cell & Environment 2003, 26:1393-1405.
24. Seguin G. Influence des terroirs viticoles sur la constitution de la qualité des vendanges. Bulletin de l'Office International de la Vigne et du Vin 1983, 56:3-18.
25. Sibille I, Ojeda H, Prieto J, Maldonado S, Lacapere J-N, Carbonneau A. Relation between the values of three pressure chamber modalities (midday leaf, midday stem and predawn water potential) of 4 grapevine cultivars in drought situation of the southern of France. Applications for the irrigation control. Proceedings of 15th International Symposium of GESCO 2007, 685-695. Sladonja B, In, Ed., The Institute of Agriculture and Tourism, Porec, Croatia, pp
26. Smith HF. An empirical law describing heterogeneity in the yields of agricultural crops. Journal of Agricultural Science 1938, 28:1-23.
27. Soar C, Speirs J, Maffei S, Penrose A, McCarthy M, Loveys B. Grapevine varieties Shiraz and Grenache differ in their stomatal response to VPD: apparent links with ABA physiology and gene expression in leaf tissue. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 2006, 12:2-12.
28. Sousa T, Oliveira M, Pereira J. Physiological indicators of plant water status of irrigated and non-irrigated grapevines grown in a low rainfall area of Portugal. Plant and Soil 2006, 282:127-134.
29. Su X, Tsai C, Wang H, Nickerson DM, Li B. Subgroup analysis via recursive partitioning. Journal of Machine Learning Research 2009, 10:141-158.
30. Tardieu F, Katerji N, Bethenod O. Relationship between soil-water status, predawn leaf water potential and other indicators of the plant water status in maize. Agronomie 1990, 10:617-626.
31. Tisseyre B, Ojeda H, Carrillo N, Deis L, Heywang M. Precision viticulture and water status, mapping the predawn water potential to define within vineyard zones. Proceedings of 14th GESCO Congress 2005, 23-27. Shultz HR, In, Ed., Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Forschungsanstalt, Geisenheim: Germany, pp
32. Trégoat O, Gaudillere J-P, Choné X, Van Leeuwen C. Etude du régime hydrique et de la nutrition azotée de la vigne par des indicateurs physiologiques. Influence sur le comportement de la vigne et la maturation du raisin (Vitis vinifera L. cv Merlot, 2000, Bordeaux). Journal International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin 2002, 36:133-142.
33. Van Leeuwen C, Seguin G. Incidences de l'alimentation en eau de la vigne, appréciée par l'état hydrique du feuillage, sur le développement de l'appareil végétatif et la maturation du raisin (Vitis vinifera variété Cabernet franc, Saint-Emilion, 1990). Journal International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin 1994, 28:81-110.