Using learning outcomes to inform teaching practices in human patient simulation

Nursing Education Perspectives

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 97-100

  Elfrink, Victoria L ^a   Kirkpatrick, Bonnie ^a   Nininger, Jami ^b   Schubert, Carolyn ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Knox County Career Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Learning Outcomes; Mastery Learning; Retention; Simulation; Situated Learning

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EDUCATION; HUMAN; LEARNING; MASTECTOMY; NURSING; NURSING EDUCATION; TEACHING;

EDUCATION, NURSING; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; LEARNING; MASTECTOMY; PATIENT SIMULATION;

EID: 77952695067     PISSN: 15365026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Hammond, G. (2006) Multiple methods of assessment Retrieved from http://xnetrrc.mb.ca/glenh/mastery-learning.htm
2. Jacobsen, W. ( 1996). Learning, culture and learning culture.Adult Education Quarterly. 47(1), 15-28.
3. Jeffries, P. (2005). A framework for designing, implementing and evaluating simulations used as teaching strategies in nursing. Nursing Education Perspectives 26, 96-103.
4. Nehrig, W., & Lashley, F. (2004). Current use and opinions regarding human patient simulators in nursing education: An international survey. Nursing Education Perspectives 25, 244-248.
5. Nehrig, W., Lashley, F., & Ellis. F. (2002). Critical indicident nursing management using human patient simulators. Nursing Education Perspectives, 23, 129-132.
6. Shor, I. (1996). When students have power: Negotiating authority in a critical pedagogy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Simpson, E., & Courtney, M. (2002). Critical thinking in nursing education: Literature review. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 8, 89-90.
8. Stein, D. (1998). Situated learning in adult education. Retrieved from www.ericdigests.org/1998-3/adult-educationa.html