Can a participatory approach contribute to food chain risk analysis?

Risk Analysis

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 766-781

  Barker, G C ^a   Bayley, C ^b   Cassidy, A ^c   French, S ^d   Hart, A ^e   Malakar, P K ^a   Maule, J ^f   Petkov, M ^g   Shepherd, R ^h  

^a INSTITUTE OF FOOD RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^b Ergon House   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^e FOOD AND ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH AGENCY   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^g UNILEVER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^h UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Food safety; Participation; Risk analysis; Risk assessment; Stakeholder

Indexed keywords

FOOD CHAIN; FOOD RISKS; FOOD SAFETY; PARTICIPATION; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PARTICIPATORY PROCESS; PROBABILISTIC MODELING; QUANTITATIVE RISK; STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION;

HEALTH; RESEARCH; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; SAFETY FACTOR;

RISK ANALYSIS;

DECISION MAKING; FLOOD; FOOD CHAIN; FOOD CONSUMPTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; RISK ASSESSMENT; STAKEHOLDER;

ARTICLE; FOOD CHAIN; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; UNCERTAINTY;

FOOD CHAIN; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 77952693541     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01385.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Codex Alimentarius Commission, Procedural Manual, 14th ed.
2. Vose D. Risk Assessment: A Quantitative Guide.
3. Renn O. Risk Governance.
4. Wynne B. Creating public alienation: Expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs. Science as Culture, 2001 10 : 445 481.
5. McGarity TO, Shapiro SA, Boiller D. Sophisticated Sabotage: The Intellectual Games used to Subvert Responsible Regulation.
6. Wales C, Harvey M, Warde A. Recuperating from BSE: The shifting UK institutional basis for trust in food. Appetite, 2006 47 : 187 195.
7. Poortinga W, Bickerstaff K, Langford I, Niewohner J, Pidgeon N. The British 2001 foot and mouth crisis: A comparative study of public risk perceptions, trust and beliefs about government policy in two communities. Journal of Risk Research, 2004 7 : 73 90.
8. Halkier B, Holm L. Shifting responsibilities for food safety in Europe: An introduction. Appetite, 2006 47 : 127 133.
9. Lofstedt RE. How can we make food risk communication better: Where are we and where are we going Journal of Risk Research, 2006 9 : 869 890.
10. Houghton JR, Rowe G, Frewer LJ, Van Kleef E, Chryssochoidis G, Kehagia O, Korzen-Bohr S, Lassen J, Pfenning U, Strada A. The quality of food risk management in Europe: Perspectives and priorities. Food Policy, 2008 33 : 13 26.
11. Fischoff B. Risk perception and communication unplugged: Twenty years of process. Risk Analysis, 1995 15 : 137 145.
12. UK Food Standards Agency. Advisory Committee on Consumer Engagement: Report to the FSA Board, 2008. Available at : http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/ pdfs/accereporttofsaboarddec08.pdf, Accessed on October 2009.
13. US Environmental Protection Agency. Public Involvement Policy, 2003. Available at : http://www.epa.gov/policy2003/policy2003.pdf, Accessed on October 2009.
14. Rowe G, Frewer LJ. Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology and Human Values, 2000 25 : 3 29.
15. Rowe G, Frewer LJ. Evaluating public-participation exercises: A research agenda. Science, Technology and Human Values, 2004 29 : 512 556.
16. Shepherd R. Involving the public and stakeholders in the evaluation of food risks. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 2008 19 : 234 239.
17. Rowe G. Public engagement in food policy. Pp. 592 609 in Frewer LJ, van Trijp H (eds). Understanding Consumers of Food Products.
18. Chilvers J. Deliberating competence: Theoretical and practitioner perspectives on effective participatory appraisal practice. Science, Technology and Human Values, 2008 33 : 421 451.
19. Rowe G, Frewer LJ. A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology and Human Values, 2005 30 : 251 290.
20. Reed MS, Graves A, Dandy N, Posthumus H, Hubacek K, Morris J, Prell C, Quinn CH, Stringer LC. Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009 90 : 1933 1949.
21. UK Cabinet Office. Food Matters, 2008. Available at : http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/media/cabinetoffice/strategy/assets/food/ food-matters1.pdf, Accessed on October 2009.
22. Kahneman D, Tversky A (eds). Choices, Values and Frames.
23. Pearl J. Causality: Models Reasoning and Inference.
24. Haas CN, Rose JB, Gerba CP. Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment.
25. National Research Council (U.S.) Committee on Improving Risk Analysis Approaches Used by the U.S. EPA. Science and Decisions.
26. Renn O. The role of risk communication and public dialogue for improving risk management. Risk Decision and Policy, 1998 3 : 5 30.
27. Shepherd R, Barker GC, French S, Hart A, Maule J, Cassidy A. Manageing food chain risks: Integrating technical and stakeholder perspectives on uncertainty. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2006 57 : 313 327.
28. th ESA Conference on the European Society or European Societies, Lisbon, Sept. 2-5, 2009 Private communication.
29. Stirling A. Inclusive deliberation and scientific expertise: Precaution, diversity and transparency in the governance of risk. Participatory Learning and Action Notes, 2001 40 : 66 71.
30. Henwood K, Pidgeon N, Sarre S, Simmons P, Smith N. Risk, framing and everyday life: Epistemological and methodological reflections from three socio-cultural projects. Health, Risk and Society, 2008 10 : 421 438.
31. Enticott G. Lay immunonlogy, local foods and rural identity: Defending unpasteurized milk in England. Sociologia Ruralis, 2003 43 : 257 270.
32. Rose G. Sick individuals and sick populations. International Journal of Epidemiology, 2001 30 : 427 432. (Pubitemid 32600223)
33. Shaw A. Discourses of risk in lay accounts of microbiological safety and BSE: A qualitative interview study. Health, Risk and Society, 2004 6 : 151 170.
34. Gruev-Vintila A, Rouquette ML. Social thinking about collective risk: How do risk-related practice and personal involvement impact its social representations Journal of Risk Research, 2007 10 : 555 581.
35. Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment.
36. Cassidy A, Maule AJ. Risk communication and participatory research: "fuzzy felt," visual games and group discussion of complex issues. In Reavey P (ed). Visual Psychologies in Qualitative Research.
37. Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology. Public Dialogue on Science and Technology, Postnote 2002 189 : 1-4. Available at : http://www.parliament.uk/post/pn189.pdf. Accessed on October 2009.
38. Sterman JD. Risk communication on climate: Mental models and mass balance. Science, 2008 322 : 532 533.
39. Irvine RJ, Fiorini S, Yearley S, McLeod JE, Turner A, Armstrong H, White PCL, Van Der Wal R. Can managers inform models? Integrating local knowledge into models of red deer habitat use. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2009 46 : 344 352.
40. Shepherd R. Involving the public and stakeholders in the evaluation of food risks. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2008 19 : 234 239.
41. Bubela T, Nisbet MC, Borchelt R, Brunger F, Critchley C, Einsiedel E, Geller G, Gupta A, Hampel J, Hyde-Lay R, Jandciu EW, Jones SA, Kolopack P, Lane S, Lougheed T, Nerlich B, Ogbogu U, O'Riordan K, Ouellette C, Spear M, Strauss S, Tharvaratnam T, Willemse L, Caulfield T. Science communication reconsidered. Nature Biotechnology, 2009 27 : 514 518.
42. Van Der Fels-Klerx HJ, Cooke RM, Nauta MN, Goosssens LH, Havelaar AH. A structured expert judgement study for a model of campylobacter transmission during broiler-chicken processing. Risk Analysis, 2005 25 : 109 124.
43. Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice.
44. Barker GC. Application of Bayesian belief network models to food safety science. Pp. 117 130 in van Boekel MAJS, Stein A, van Bruggen AHC (eds). Bayesian Statistics and Quality Modelling in the Agro-Food Production Chain.
45. Pennycook FR, Diamond EM, Watterson A, Howard CV. Modelling the dietary pesticide exposures of young children. International Journal of Occupation and Environmental Health, 2004 10 : 304 309.
46. Brown I. Modelling the dietary pesticide exposures of young children. International Journal of Occupation and Environmental Health, 2004 10 : 468 470.
47. Jorgensen F, Bailey R, Williams S, Henderson P, Wareing DRA, Bolton FJ, Frost JA, Ward L, Humphrey TJ. Prevalence and numbers of Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. on raw, whole chickens in relation to sampling methods. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2002 76 : 151 164.
48. Uyttendaele M, Baert K, Ghafir Y, Daube G, De Zutter L, Herman L, Dierick K, Pierard D, Dubois JJ, Horion B, Debevere J. Quantitative risk assessment of Campylobacter spp. in poultry based meat preparations as one of the factors to support the development of risk-based microbiological criteria in Belgium. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2006 111 : 149 163.
49. van Larebeke N, Hens L, Schepens P, Covaci A, Baeyens J, Everaert K, Bernheim JK, Vlietinck R, De Poorter G. The Belgian PCB and dioxin incident of January-June 1999: Exposure data and potential impact on health. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2001 109 : 265 273.