Using the Clark Simulation Evaluation Rubric with associate degree and baccalaureate nursing students

Nursing Education Perspectives

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 101-105

  Gantt, Laura T ^a  

^a EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Nursing Education; Performance Based Assessment; Rubric; Simulation; Summative Evaluation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NEWBORN; NEWBORN NURSING; NURSING EDUCATION; OBSERVER VARIATION; OBSTETRICAL NURSING; PREGNANCY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; UNITED STATES;

EDUCATION, NURSING, ASSOCIATE; EDUCATION, NURSING, BACCALAUREATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MANIKINS; NEONATAL NURSING; NORTH CAROLINA; OBSERVER VARIATION; OBSTETRICAL NURSING; PREGNANCY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 77952688522     PISSN: 15365026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Arwood, E., & Kaakinen, J. (2009). SIMulation based on Language and Learning (SIMBaLL):The model. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 6(1), Art 9.
2. Benner, P. (1984). From novice to expert Excellence and power in clinical nursing. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Benner, P., Tanner, C., & Chesla, C. ( 1992). From beginner to expert Gaining a differentiated clinical world in critical care nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 14(3), 13-28.
4. Bloom, B. S., Englehart M. D., Furst E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives:The classification of educational goals. New York: David McKay.
5. Boulet J. R., Murray, D., Kras, J., & Woodhouse, J. (2008). Setting performance standards for mannequin-based acute-care scenarios:An examinee-centered approach. Simulation in Healthcare, 3(2), 72-81. (Pubitemid 351725506)
6. Clark, M. (2006). Evaluating an obstetrical trauma scenario [Electronic version]. Clinical Simulation in Nursing Education, 2(2), e75-e77.
7. Clark, M. (2007a). Clinical simulation grading rubric. Unpublished master's thesis, Midwestern State University, Wilson School of Nursing, Wichita Falls.Texas.
8. Clark, M. (2007b, February). Tool time: Lessons learned in instrument development Poster session presented at the NLN Leadership Conference, Orlando, Florida.
9. Glavin, R. J., & Gaba, D. M. (2008). Challenges and opportunities in simulation and assessment Simulation in Healthcare, 3(2), 69-71.
10. Lasater, K. (2007). Clinical Judgment development Using simulation to create an assessment rubric. Journal of Nursing Education, 46(11), 496-503.
11. McGaghie, W. C. ( 1999). Simulation in professional competence assessment Basic considerations. In A. Tekian, C. McGuire, & W. McGaghie (Eds.), Innovative simulations for assessing professional competence: From paper-and-pencil to virtual reality (pp. 7-22). Chicago: University of Illinois, Department of Medical Education.
12. Morgan, P. J., Cleve-Hogg, D., DeSousa, S., & Tarshis, J. (2004). High-fidelity patient simulation: Validation of performance checklists. British Journal of Anesthesia, 92(3), 388-392. (Pubitemid 38263509)
13. Morgan, P. J., Cleve-Hogg, D., & Guest C. B. (2001). A comparison of global ratings and checklists scores from an undergraduate assessment using an anesthesia simulator. Academic Medicine, 76(10), 1053-1055.
14. Newble, D., Dawson, B., Dauphinee, D., Page, G., Macdonald, M., Swanson, D., et al. ( 1994). Guidelines for assessing clinical competence. Teaching and Learning in Medical Education, 6(3), 213-220.
15. Rhodes,M.,&Curran,C.(2005).Useofthehumanpatientsimulator- teachclinicaljudgmentskillsinabaccalaureatenursingprogram.CIN:Computers, Informatics,andNursing,23(5),256-262.(Pubitemid41499937)
16. Roberts, C., Newble, D., Jolly, B., Reed, M., & Hampton, K. (2006). Assuring the quality of highstakes undergraduate assessments of clinical competence. Medical Teacher, 28(6), 535-543. (Pubitemid 44660480)