Aerodynamic instability of a bridge deck section model: Linear and nonlinear approach to force modeling

Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics

Volumn 98, Issue 6-7, 2010, Pages 363-374

  Diana, G ^a   Rocchi, D ^a   Argentini, T ^a   Muggiasca, S ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Aerodynamic instability; Bridge aeroelasticity; Hysteresis loop; Nonlinear effects; Numerical simulation; Wind tunnel aeroelastic sectional test

Indexed keywords

ANGLE OF ATTACK; BRIDGE DECKS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HYSTERESIS LOOPS; NONLINEAR OPTICS; WIND TUNNELS;

AERODYNAMIC INSTABILITY; AEROELASTIC BEHAVIOR; AEROELASTIC PROBLEMS; BRIDGE AEROELASTICITIES; BRIDGE DECK SECTION; EXPERIMENTAL CAMPAIGN; NONLINEAR EFFECT; TIME DOMAIN MODELING;

AEROELASTICITY;

EID: 77952669762     PISSN: 01676105     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2010.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Caracoglia L., Jones N.P. Time domain vs. frequency domain characterization of aeroelastic forces for bridge deck sections. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2003, 91(3):371-402.
2. Chen X., Kareem A. Nonlinear response analysis of long-span bridges under turbulent winds. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2001, 89(14-15):1335-1350.
3. Chen X., Kareem A. Aeroelastic analysis of bridges: Effects of turbulence and aerodynamic nonlinearities. J. Eng. Mech. 2003, 129(8):885-895.
4. Chen X., Matsumoto M., Kareem A. Time domain flutter and buffeting response analysis of bridges. J. Eng. Mech. 2000, 126(1):7-16.
5. Diana, G., Bruni, S., Rocchi, D., 2005. A numerical and experimental investigation on aerodynamic non linearities in bridge response to turbulent wind. In: Proceedings of the EACWE 4, Prague CR.
6. Diana G., Falco M., Bruni S., Cigada A., Larose G., Damsgaard A., Collina A. Comparisons between wind tunnel tests on a full aeroelastic model of the proposed bridge over stretto di messina and numerical results. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 1995, 54-55:101-113.
7. Diana, G., Resta, F., Rocchi, D., 2007. A new approach to model the aeroelastic response of bridges in time domain by means of a rheological model. In: Proceedings of the ICWE 12, Cairns, Australia.
8. Diana G., Resta F., Rocchi D. A new numerical approach to reproduce bridge aerodynamic non-linearities in time domain. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2008, 96(10-11):1871-1884.
9. Diana, G., Resta, F., Rocchi, D., Argentini, T., 2008b. Aerodynamic hysteresis: wind tunnel tests and numerical implementation of a fully non linear model for the bridge aeroelastic forces. In: Proceedings of the AWAS 08, Jeju, Korea.
10. Diana G., Resta F., Zasso A., Belloli M., Rocchi D. Forced motion and free motion aeroelastic tests on a new concept dynamometric section model of the messina suspension bridge. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2004, 92(6):441-462.
11. Hartley R., Zisserman A. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. second ed.
12. Jain A., Jones N.P., Scanlan R.H. Coupled aeroelastic and aerodynamic response analysis of long-span bridges. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 1996, 60(1-3):69-80.
13. Minh N.N., Miyata T., Yamada H., sanada Y. Numerical simulation of wind turbulence and buffeting analysis of long-span bridges. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 1999, 83:301-315.
14. Zasso A. Flutter derivatives: advantages of a new representation convention. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 1996, 60(1-3):35-47.
15. Zhang X., Xiang H., Sun B. Nonlinear aerostatic and aerodynamic analysis of long-span suspension bridges considering wind-structure interactions. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 2002, 90(9):1065-1080.