Eloquence and incommensurability: An investigation into the grammar of irreconcilable differences

Social Studies of Science

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 349-375

  Lezaun, Javier ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accountability; Evolution; Incommensurability; Scopes trial

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952658728     PISSN: 03063127     EISSN: 14603659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0306312709358119     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Atkinson, J. Maxwell (1992) Displaying Neutrality: Formal Aspects of Informal Court Proceedings, in P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 199-211.
2. Atkinson, J. Maxwell & Paul Drew (1979) Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings (London: Macmillan).
3. Austin, J.L. (1979) Philosophical Papers (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
4. Biagioli, Mario (1990) 'The Anthropology of Incommensurability', Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part A 21(2): 183-209.
5. Burns, Robert P. (2001) A Theory of the Trial (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
6. Buttny, Richard & Thomas Isbell (1991) The Problem of Communicating Zen Understanding: A Microanalysis of Teacher-student Interviews in a North American Zen Monastery, Human Studies 14: 287-309.
7. Coletta, Paolo E. (1969) William Jennings Bryan, Vol. III: Political Puritan, 1915-1925 (Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press).
8. Davidson, Donald (2006 [1974]) On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme, in D. Davidson, The Essential Davidson (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 196-208.
9. De Camp, L. Sprague (1968) The Great Monkey Trial (New York: Doubleday).
10. Drew, Paul (1992) Contested Evidence in Courtroom Cross-examination: The case of a Trial for Rape, in P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
11. Garfinkel, Harold (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall).
12. Grebstein, Sheldon Norman (ed.) (1960) Monkey Trial: The State of Tennessee vs. John Thomas Scopes (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company).
13. Hays, Arthur Garfield (1928) Let Freedom Ring (New York: Boni and Liveright).
14. Heritage, John (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology (Cambridge: Polity Press).
15. Hilleary, William & Oren Metzger (1925) The World's Most Famous Court Trial. Tennessee Evolution Case. A Complete Stenographic Report of the Famous Court Test of the Anti-Evolution Act, at Dayton July 10 to 21, 1925, Including Speeches and Arguments of Attorneys (Cincinnati: National Book Company).
16. Jensen, Richard J. (1992) Clarence Darrow: The Creation of an American Myth (New York, NY: Greenwood Press).
17. Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
18. Kuhn, Thomas S. (1982) Commensurability, Comparability, Communicability, Proceedings of the Philosophical Society Association, Vol. 2: 669-88.
19. Lambert, Kevin (2006) Fuller's Folly, Kuhnian Paradigms, and Intelligent Design, Social Studies of Science 36(6): 834-42.
20. Larson, Edward J. (2006) Summer for the Gods: The Scopes Trial and America's Continuing Debate over Science and Religion (New York: Basic Books).
21. Lawrence, Jerome & Robert E. Lee (1955) Inherit the Wind (New York, NY: Random House).
22. Lawrence, Jerome & Robert E. Lee (1957) 'Inherit the Wind: The Genesis & Exodus of the Play' Theatre Arts (August).
23. Levine Lawrence W. (1987) Defender of the Faith: William Jennings Bryan, the Last Decade, 1915-1925 (New York, NY: Oxford University Press).
24. Lezaun, Javier & Linda Soneryd (2007) Consulting Citizens: Technologies of Elicitation and the Mobility of Publics, Public Understanding of Science 16(3): 279-97.
25. Lippmann, Walter (1928) American Inquisitors (New York, NY: Macmillan).
26. Lynch, Michael (1993) Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
27. Lynch, Michael (2004) Circumscribing Expertise: Membership Categories in Courtroom Testimony, in S. Jasanoff (ed.), States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order (London: Routledge): 161-80.
28. Lynch, Michael & David Bogen (1996) The Spectacle of History: Speech, Text, and Memory at the Iran-Contra Hearings (Durham, NC: Duke University Press).
29. Lynch, Michael & David Bogen (2005) My Memory has been Shredded: A Non-Cognitivist Investigation of Mental Phenomena, in H. te Molder & J. Potter (eds), Conversation and Cognition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 226-40.
30. Marres, Noortje (2007) The Issues Deserve More Credit: Pragmatist Contributions to the Study of Public Involvement in Controversy, Social Studies of Science 37(5): 759-80.
31. Marsden, George M. (2006) Fundamentalism and American Culture (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press).
32. Mencken, H.L. (1926) Prejudices Fifth Series (New York, NY: A.A. Knopf).
33. Moore, Robert J. (1995) Dereification in Zen Buddhism, The Sociological Quarterly 36(4): 699-723.
34. Moran, Jeffrey P. (2002) The Scopes Trial: A Brief History with Documents (Boston: Bedford/ St Martin's).
35. Nicholls, William (1971) Systematic and Philosophical Theology (Harmondworth: Penguin Books).
36. Numbers, Ronald L. (1998) Darwinism Comes to America (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
37. Numbers, Ronald L. (2006) The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).
38. Popper, Karl S. (1994) The Myth of the Framework, in K. R. Popper, The Myth of the Framework: In Defence of Science and Rationality (London: Routledge): 33-64.
39. Priest, Gerald L. (1999) William Jennings Bryan and the Scopes Trial: A Fundamentalist Perspective, Detroit Baptist Theological Seminary 4 (Fall): 51-83.
40. Sacks, Harvey (1992a) Lectures on Conversation, Volume One (Oxford: Blackwell).
41. Sacks, Harvey (1992b) Lectures on Conversation, Volume Two (Oxford: Blackwell).
42. Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1968) Sequencing in Conversational Openings, American Anthropologist 70(6): 1075-95.
43. Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1988/89) From Interview to Confrontation: Observations of the Bush/ Rather Encounter, Research on Language and Social Interaction 22: 215-40.
44. Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Harvey Sacks (1973) Opening up Closings, Semiotica 8 (4): 289-327.
45. Sullivan, Winnifred Fallers (2005) The Impossibility of Religious Freedom (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
46. Suzuki, David T. (1949) Essays in Zen Buddhism, First Series (New York, NY: Grove Press).
47. Szasz, Ferenc M. (1971) The Scopes Trial in Perspective, Tennessee Historical Quarterly 30(3): 288-98.
48. Walker, Samuel (1990) In Defense of American Liberties: A History of the ACLU (New York: Oxford University Press).
49. Waters, L. (2001) The Age of Incommensurability, boundary 228: 133-72.