Weed control and yield comparisons of twin- and single-row glyphosate-resistant cotton production systems

Weed Technology

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 95-101

  Reddy, Krishna N ^a   Boykin, J Clif ^a  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Canopy; Paired row; Weed biomass; Weed management; Wide row

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; COTTON; CROP YIELD; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FIELDWORK; GLYPHOSATE; WEED; WEED CONTROL;

MISSISSIPPI; STONEVILLE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77952610388     PISSN: 0890037X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/WT-D-09-00044.1     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Anonymous. 2008a. Roundup WeatherMax label. Monsanto, St. Louis, Missouri. http://www.monsanto.com/monsanto/ag-products/pdf/labels-msds/ roundup-weathermax
2. Anonymous. 2008b. Crops: Cotton. Mississippi State University Extension Service, Mississippi State, Mississippi. http://msucares.com/crops/cotton/ index.html. Accessed June 20, 2008.
3. Boykin, D. L., R. R. Carle, C. D. Ranney, and R. Shanklin. 1995. Weather data summary for 1964-1993, Stoneville, MS. Tech. Bull. 201. Mississippi State, Mississippi: Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, Mississippi State University. 49 p.
4. Buehring, N. W., M. H. Willcutt, E. P. Columbus, J. B. Phelps, and A. F. Ruscoe. 2006. Yield and plant characteristics as influenced by spindle picker narrow and wide row patterns: three years progress report. Pages 1864-1870 in Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, San Antonio, TX, January 3- 6, 2006. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America.
5. Harrison, M. P., N. W. Buehring, R. R. Dobbs, and M. H. Willcutt. 2006. Narrow row spindle picker cotton response to bed systems and seeding rates. Pages 1665-1667 in Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, San Antonio, TX, January 3-6, 2006. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America.
6. Jordan, D. L., J. B. Beam, P. D. Johnson, and J. F. Spears. 2001. Peanut response to prohexadione calcium in three seeding rate-row pattern planting systems. Agron. J. 93:232-236.
7. Jost, P. H. and J. T. Cothren. 2000. Growth and yield comparisons of cotton planted in conventional and ultra narrow row spacings. Crop Sci. 40:430-435.
8. Karlen, D. L. and C. R. Camp. 1985. Row spacing, plant population, and water management effects on corn in the Atlantic coastal plain. Agron. J. 77:393-398.
9. Karnei, J. R. 2005. The agronomics and economics of 15-inch cotton. Page 601 in Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, New Orleans, LA, January 4-7, 2005. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America.
10. Koger, C. 2007. Effect of soybean row spacing on yield: twin-row vs. narrow- and wide-rows. Page 61 in Proceedings of the 10th Annual National Conservation Systems Cotton and Rice Conference, Houston, TX. January 29-30, 2007.
11. Perryville, MO: MidAmerica Farm Publications. Lanier, J. E., D. L. Jordan, J. F. Spears, R. Wells, P. D. Johnson, J. S. Barnes, C. A. Hurt, R. L. Brandenburg, and J. E. Bailey. 2004. Peanut response to planting pattern, row spacing, and irrigation. Agron. J. 96:1066-1072.
12. Nelson, K. A. 2007. Glyphosate application timings in twin- and single-row corn and soybean spacings. Weed Technol. 21:186-190.
13. Nichols, S. P., C. E. Snipes, and M. A. Jones. 2004. Cotton growth, lint yield, and fiber quality as affected by row spacing and cultivar. J. Cotton Sci. 8:1-12. http://www.cotton.org/journal/2004-08/1/. Accessed June 17, 2008.
14. Reddy, K. N. 2004. Weed control and species shift in bromoxynil- and glyphosate-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) rotation systems. Weed Technol. 18:131-139.
15. Reddy, K. N., I. C. Burke, J. C. Boykin, and J. R. Williford. 2009. Narrow-row cotton production under irrigated and non-irrigated environment: plant population and lint yield. J. Cotton. Sci. 13:48-55.
16. Sorensen, R. B., M. C. Lamb, and C. L. Butts. 2006. Row pattern, plant density, and nitrogen rate effects on corn yield in the southeastern US. Crop Manag. http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/sub/cm/research/2006/corn/sorensen. pdf. Accessed June 20, 2008.
17. Willcutt, M. H., E. P. Columbus, N. W. Buehring, R. R. Dobbs, and M. P. Harrison. 2006. Evaluation of a 15-inch spindle harvester in various row patterns; three years progress. Pages 531-547 in Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, San Antonio, TX, January 3-6, 2006. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America.
18. Wilson, D. G., Jr. 2006. Evaluation of weed management and the agronomic utility of cotton grown on a 15-inch row configuration. Ph.D dissertation. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University. 144 p.
19. Wilson, D. G., Jr., A. C. York, and K. L. Edmisten. 2007. Narrow-row cotton response to mepiquat chloride. J. Cotton Sci. 11:177-185. http://www.cotton. org/journal/2007-11/4/. Accessed June 17, 2008.