The bilateral field advantage in a sequential face-name matching task with famous and nonfamous faces

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 25-32

  Collin, Charles A ^a   Byrne, Stacie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Face perception; Familiarity; Interhemispheric interaction; Transcortical cell assembly; Working memory

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY; VISUAL FIELD;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ASSOCIATION; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SERIAL LEARNING; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 77952600876     PISSN: 11961961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0016312     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Averbach, E., & Sperling, G. (1961). Short term storage of information in vision. In C. Cherry (Ed.), Information theory (pp. 196-211). London: Butterworth.
2. Boles, D. B. (1990). What bilateral displays do. Brain and Cognition, 12, 205-228.
3. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision. 10, 433-436.
4. Campanella, S., Joassin, F., Rossion, B., De Voider, A. G., Bruyer, R., & Crommelinck, M. (2001). Association of the distinct visual representations of faces and names: A PET activation study. Neurolmage, 14, 873-882.
5. Dimond, S., & Beaumont, G. (1972). Hemisphere function and color naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 96, 87-91.
6. Fukuda, Y., Sawai, H., Watanabe, M., Wakakuwa, K., & Morigiwa, K. (1989). Nasotemporal overlap of crossed and uncrossed retinal ganglion cell projections in the Japanese monkey (Macaca fuscata). Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 2353-2373.
7. Hebb, D. (1949). The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory. New York: Wiley.
8. Ivanoff, J., & Klein, R. M. (2006). Inhibition of return: Sensitivity and criterion as a function of response time, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 908-919.
9. Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302-4311.
10. Koivisto, M. (2000). Interhemispheric interaction in semantic categorization of pictures. Cognitive Brain Research, 9, 45-51.
11. Leventhal, A. G., Ault, S. J., & Vitek, D. J. (1988). The nasotemporal division in primate retina: The neural bases of macular sparing and splitting. Science, 240, 66-67.
12. Lines, C. R., & Milner, A. D. (1983). Nasotemporal overlap in the human retina investigated by means of simple reaction time to lateralized light flash. Experimental Brain Research, 50, 166-172.
13. Meeter, M., & Murre, J. M. J. (2004). Consolidation of long-term memory: Evidence and alternatives. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 843-857.
14. Miller, J. (1982). Divided attention: Evidence for co-activation with redundant signals. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 247-279.
15. Miniussi, C., Girelli, M., & Marzi, C. A. (1998). Neural site of the redundant target effect: Electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 216-230.
16. Mohr, B., Endrass, T., Hauka, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2007). ERP correlates of the bilateral redundancy gain for words. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2114-2124.
17. Mohr, B., Landgrebe, A., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2002). Interhemispheric cooperation for familiar but not unfamiliar face processing, Neuropsychologia, 40, 1841-1848.
18. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442
19. Pulvermüller, F., & Mohr, B. (1996). The concept of transcortical cell assemblies: A key to the understanding of cortical lateralization and interhemispheric interaction. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 20, 557-566.
20. Reinholz, J., & Pollmann, S. (2007). Neural basis of redundancy effects in visual object categorization. Neuroscience Letters, 412, 123-128.
21. Roser, M., & Corballis, M. C. (2003). Interhemispheric neural summation in the split brain: effects of stimulus colour and task. Neuropsychologia, 41, 830-846.
22. Samuel, A. G., & Kat, D. (2003). Inhibition of return: A graphical metaanalysis of its time course and an empirical test of its temporal and spatial properties. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 897-906.
23. Santhouse, A. M., ffytche, D. H. Howard, R. J. Williams, S. C. R. Rifkin, L., & Murray, R. M. (2002). Functional imaging of the mechanisms underlying the bilateral field advantage. Neurolmage, 17, 680-687.
24. Schweinberger, S. R., Landgrebe, A., Mohr, B., & Kaufmann, J. M. (2003). Personal names and the human right hemisphere: An illusory link? Brain and Language, 18, 111-120.
25. Sergentm, J., Ohta, S., & MacDonald, B. (1992). Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. Brain, 115, 15-36.
26. Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentation. Psychological Monographs, 74, 1-30.
27. Sperling, R. A., Bates, J. F., Cocchiarella, A. J., Schacter, D. L., Rosen, B. R., & Albert, M. S. (2001). Encoding novel face-name associations: A functional MRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 14, 129-139.
28. Tamietto, M., Adenzato, M., Geminiani, G., & de Gelder, B. (2007). Fast recognition of social emotions takes the whole brain: Interhemispheric cooperation in the absence of cerebral asymmetry. Neuropsychologia 45(4):836-843.
29. Zaidel, E., & Rayman, J. (1994). Interhemispheric control in the normal brain: Evidence from redundant bilateral presentations. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance: Conscious and non-conscious information processing (Vol. 15, pp. 477-504). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.