Recent advances in modeling and analysis of bioelectric and biomagnetic sources

Biomedizinische Technik

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 65-76

  Sander, Tilmann H ^a   Knösche, Thomas R ^b   Schlögl, Alois ^c   Kohl, Florian ^d   Wolters, Carsten H ^e   Haueisen, Jens ^f,g   Trahms, Lutz ^a  

^a PHYSIKALISCH TECHNISCHE BUNDESANSTALT   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^c GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^d TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^f FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

^g ILMENAU UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Autoregressive modeling; Electro magnetoencephalography; Finite element method; Inverse problem; Statistical independence; Validation

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE AREA; ACTIVITY CENTERS; ANIMAL STUDIES; AUTOREGRESSIVE MODELING; BRAIN FUNCTIONS; CARDIO-VASCULAR DISEASE; CONNECTIVITY ANALYSIS; CURRENT TRENDS; DATA ANALYSIS; ELECTRICAL ACTIVITIES; ELECTRO-/MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FINITE ELEMENT MODELING; HUMAN BODIES; INFORMATION FLOWS; INVERSE SOLUTION; MEASURED DATA; MODELING AND ANALYSIS; PHANTOM MEASUREMENTS; SOURCE RECONSTRUCTION; STATISTICAL INDEPENDENCE; UNKNOWN PARAMETERS; VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION;

BRAIN; DATA FLOW ANALYSIS; DATA HANDLING; INVERSE PROBLEMS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; SULFUR COMPOUNDS;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOMETRY; REVIEW;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; RADIOMETRY;

EID: 77952593076     PISSN: 00135585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/BMT.2010.027     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Baccala LA, Sameshima K. Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination. Biol Cybern 2001; 84: 463-474.
2. Baccala LA, Takahashi DY, Sameshima K. Computer intensive testing for the influence between time series In: Schelter B, Winterhalder M, Timmer J, editors. Handbook of time series analysis - recent theoretical developments and applications. New York: Wiley 2006: 411-433.
3. Bertrand O, Thevenet M, Perrin F. 3D finite element method in brain electrical activity studies. In: Nenonen J, Rajala HM, Katila T, editors. Biomagnetic localization and 3D modelling. Rep Dep Tech Phys, Helsinki University of Technology 1991: 154-171.
4. Brauer H, Haueisen J, Ziolkowski M, Tenner U, Nowak H. Reconstruction of extended current sources in a human body phantom applying biomagnetic measuring techniques. IEEE Trans Magn 2000; 36: 1700-1705.
5. Brockmeier K, Schmitz L, Bobadilla Cruz J, et al. Magnetocardiography and 32-lead potential mapping: the repolarization in normal subjects during pharmacologically induced stress. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1997; 8: 615-626.
6. Cichocki A, Amari S. Adaptive blind signal and image processing. New York: Wiley 2002
7. Di Rienzo L, Haueisen J, Arturi CM. Three component magnetic field data: impact on minimum morm solutions in a biomedical application. COMPEL 2005; 24: 869-881.
8. Drechsler F, Wolters CH, Dierkes T, Si H, Grasedyck L. A full subtraction approach for finite element method based source analysis using constrained Delaunay tetrahedralisation. NeuroImage 2009; 46: 1055-1065.
9. Erné SN, Scher HJ. Brainstem auditory evoked magnetic fields in the response to stimulation with brief tone pulses. Int J Neurosci 1987; 37: 115-125.
10. Flemming L, Wang Y, Caprihan A, Eiselt M, Haueisen J, Okada Y. Evaluation of the distortion of EEG signals caused by a hole in the skull mimicking the fontanel in the skull of human neonates. Clin Neurophys 2005; 116: 1141-1152.
11. Gómez-Herrero G, Atienza M, Egiazarian K, Cantero HL. Measuring directional coupling between EEG sources. NeuroImage 2008; 43: 497-508.
12. Gonzalez Andino SL, Grave de Peralta Menendez R, Khateb A, Landis T, Pegna AJ. Electrophysiological correlates of affective blindsight. NeuroImage 2009; 44: 581-589.
13. Grave de Peralta Menendez R, Gonzalez Andino SL, Morand S, Michel CM, Landis T. Imaging the electrical activity of the brain: ELECTRA. Hum Brain Mapp 2000; 9: 1-12.
14. Gross J, Kujala J, Hamalainen M, Timmermann L, Schnitzler A, Salmelin R. Dynamic imaging of coherent sources: studying neural interactions in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 694-699.
15. Güllmar D, Haueisen J, Eiselt M, et al. Influence of anisotropic conductivity on EEG source reconstruction: investigations in a rabbit model. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2006; 53: 1841-1850.
16. Haueisen J, Tuch DS, Ramon C, et al. The influence of brain tissue anisotropy on human EEG and MEG. NeuroImage 2002; 15: 159-166.
17. Hillebrand A, Barnes GR. A quantitative assessment of the sensitivity of whole-head MEG to activity in the adult human cortex. NeuroImage 2002; 16: 638-650.
18. Hyvärinen A, Karhunen J, Oja E. Independent component analysis. New York: Wiley 2001
19. Kaminski MJ, Blinowska KJ. A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures. Biol Cybern 1991; 65: 203-210.
20. Kohl F, Wübbeler G, Kolossa D, Elster C, Bär M, Orglmeister R. Non-independent BSS: a model for evoked MEG signals with controllable dependencies. Proceedings of ICA 2009. Lect Notes Comp Sci 2009; 5441: 443-450.
21. Lew S, Wolters CH, Anwander A, Makeig S, MacLeod RS. Improved EEG source analysis using low resolution conductivity estimation in a four-compartment finite element head model. Hum Brain Mapp 2009; 30: 2862-2878.
22. Lew S, Wolters CH, Röer C, Dierkes T, MacLeod RS. Accuracy and run-time comparison for different potential approaches and iterative solvers in finite element method based EEG source analysis. Appl Numer Math 2009; 59: 1970-1988.
23. Liehr M, Haueisen J, Görnig M, Seidel P, Katila T, Nenonen J. Vortex shaped current sources in a Physical Torso Phantom. Ann Biomed Eng 2005; 33: 240-247.
24. Liehr M, Haueisen J. Influence of anisotropic compartments on magnetic field and electric potential distributions generated by artificial current dipoles inside a torso phantom. Phys Med Biol 2008;53:245-254.
25. Lopes da Silva F, van Rotterdam A. Biophysical aspects of EEG and magnetoencephalogram generation. In: Niedermeyer E, Lopes da Silva F, editors. Electroencephalography: basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields. 4th edition. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins 1999: 93-109.
26. Malmivuo J, Suihko V, Eskola H. Sensitivity distributions of EEG and MEG measurements. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1997; 44: 196-208.
27. Marin G, Guerin C, Baillet S, Garnero L, Meunier G. Influence of skull anisotropy for the forward and inverse problem in EEG: simulation studies using FEM on realistic head models. Human Brain Mapp 1998; 6: 250-269.
28. Mills RG. Signaling in nervous systems. In: Bray JJ, Cragg PA, Macknight ADC, Mills RG, editors. Lecture notes on human physiology. 4th edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing 1999: 65-102.
29. Murakami S, Okada Y. Contributions of principal neocortical neurons to magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography signals. J Phys Lond 2006; 575: 925-936.
30. Nolte G, Bai O, Wheaton L, Mari Z, Vorbach S, Hallett M. Identifying true brain interaction from EEG data using the imaginary part of coherency. Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 115: 2292-2307.
31. 31x Olesch J, Ruthotto L, Kugel H, Fischer B, Wolters CH. A variational approach for the correction of field-inhomogeneities in EPI sequences. Proc SPIE (Medical Imaging 2010: Image Processing) 2010; 7623: in press.
32. Roth BJ, Wikswo JP Jr. Electrically silent magnetic fields. Biophys J 1986; 50: 729-745.
33. Rullmann M, Anwander A, Dannhauer M, Warfield SK, Duffy FH, Wolters CH. EEG source analysis of epileptiform activity using a 1 mm anisotropic hexahedra finite element head model. NeuroImage 2009; 44: 399-410.
34. Sander TH, Burghoff M, Van Leeuwen P, Trahms L. Application of decorrelation independent component analysis to biomagnetic multi-channel measurements. Biomed Tech 2007; 52: 130-136.
35. Sarvas J. Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. Phys Med Biol 1987; 32: 11-22.
36. Scherg M. Akustisch evozierte Potentiale: Grundlagen, Enstehungsmechanismen, Quellenmodell. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer 1992.
37. Schimpf PH, Ramon CR, Haueisen J. Dipole models for the EEG and MEG. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2002; 49: 409-418.
38. Schlögl A. A comparison of multivariate autoregressive estimators. Signal Processing 2006; 86: 2426-2429.
39. Schlögl A, Supp G. Analyzing event-related EEG data with multivariate autoregressive parameters. Prog Brain Res 2006; 159: 135-147.
40. Sengül G, Liehr M, Haueisen J, Baysal U. An experimental study on the effect of the anisotropic regions in a realistically shaped torso phantom. Ann Biomed Eng 2008; 36: 1836-1843.
41. Stenroos M, Haueisen J. Boundary element computations in the forward and inverse problem of electrocardiography: com parison of collocation and Galerkin weightings. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2008; 55: 2124-2133.
42. Supp GG, Schlögl A, Trujillo-Barreto N, Müller MM, Gruber T. Directed cortical information flow during human object recognition: analyzing induced EEG gamma-band responses in brain's source space. PLoS ONE 2007; 2: e684.
43. Tenner U, Haueisen J, Nowak H, Leder U, Brauer H. Source localization in an inhomogeneous physical thorax phantom. Phys Med Biol 1999; 44: 1969-1981. (Pubitemid 29387605)
44. Väisänen O, Malmivuo J. Improving the SNR of EEG generated by deep sources with weighted multielectrode leads. J Physiol Paris 2009; 103: 306-314.
45. van den Broek SP, Zhou H, Peters MJ. Computation of neuromagnetic fields using finite element method and Biot Savart Law. Med Biol Eng Comp 1996; 34: 21-26.
46. Vigario R, Oja E. BSS and ICA in neuroinformatics: from current practices to challenges. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 2008; 1: 50-61.
47. Wipf DP, Owen JP, Attias HT, Sekihara K, Nagarajan SS. Robust Bayesian estimation of the location, orientation, and time course of multiple correlated neural sources using MEG. NeuroImage 2010; 49: 641-655.
48. Wolters CH, Anwander A, Berti G, Hartmann U. Geometryadapted hexahedral meshes improve accuracy of finite element method based EEG source analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2007; 54: 1446-1453.
49. Wolters CH, Anwander A, Weinstein D, Koch M, Tricoche X, MacLeod R. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using highresolution finite element modeling. NeuroImage 2006; 30: 813-826.
50. Wolters CH, Grasedyck L, Hackbusch W. Efficient computation of lead field bases and influence matrix for the FEM-based EEG and MEG inverse problem. Inverse Problems 2004; 20: 1099-1116.
51. Wolters CH, Köstler H, Möller C, Härtlein J, Grasedyck L, Hackbusch W. Numerical mathematics of the subtraction method for the modeling of a current dipole in EEG source reconstruction using finite element head models. SIAM J Sci Comput 2007; 30: 24-45.