International regulation of audit quality: full harmonization or mutual recognition? An economic approach

European Accounting Review

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 3-27

  Trombetta, Marco ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952583837     PISSN: 09638180     EISSN: 14684497     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0963818022000001073     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Cremer, H., De Ricke, M., and Grimaud, A., 1997. Service quality, competition and regulatory policies in the postal sector. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 11: 5–19.
2. Ecchia, G., and Lambertini, L., 1997. Minimum quality standards and collusion Journal of Industrial Economics, 45: 101–113.
3. Frantz, P., 1999. Auditor's skill, auditing standards, litigation, and audit quality. British Accounting Review, 31: 151–183.
4. Pong, C., 1999. Auditor concentration: a replication and extension for the UK audit market 1991–1995. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 26: 451–475.
5. Boom, A., 1995. Asymmetric international minimum quality standards and vertical differentiation. Journal of Industrial Economics, 43: 101–119.
6. Dye, R. A., 1993b. Limiting auditor's liability. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 2: 435–443.
7. Dye, R. A., 1993a. Auditing standards, legal liability, and auditor wealth. Journal of Political Economy, 101: 887–914.
8. Crampes, C., and Hollander, A., 1995. Duopoly and quality standards. European Economic Review, 39: 71–82.
9. Scarpa, C., 1998. Minimum quality standards with more than two firms. International Journal of Industrial Organisation, 16: 665–676.
10. EU Commission. June 1996. The role, the position and the liability of the statutory auditor within the European Union June, Green Paper, 1996
11. Falk, H., and Lally, M., July 1998. The demand for audit services, July, Rutgers University. Mimeo, 1998
12. EU Commission. May 1998. The statutory audit in the European Union: the way forward, Communication May, 1998
13. Ewert, R., 1999. Auditor liability and the precision of auditing standards. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 155: 181–213.
14. Lutz, S., April 1996. Trade effects of minimum quality standards with and without deterred entry, CEPR Discussion Paper No 1384 April,
15. Narayanan, V., 1994. An analysis of auditor liability rules. Journal of Accounting Research, 32: 39–59.
16. Grout, P., Jewitt, I., Pong, C., and Whittington, G., 1994. Auditor professional judgement: implications for the regulation and the law. Economic Policy, 9: 307–351.
17. Gwilliam, D., 1997. “ Changes in the legal environment ”. In Current Issues in Auditing, Edited by: Sherer, M, and Turley, S., London: Paul Chapman.
18. Ronnen, U., 1991. Minimum quality standards, fixed costs, and competition. Rand Journal of Economics, 22: 490–504.
19. Willekens, M., Steele, A., and Miltz, D., 1996. Audit standards and auditor liability: a theoretical model. Accounting and Business Research, 26: 249–264.
20. Chan, D. K., Feltham, G. A., and Simunic, D. A., December 1998. A spatial analysis of competition in the market for audit services, December, University of British Columbia. Mimeo, 1998
21. Buijink, W., Maijoor, S., Meuwissen, R., and van Witteloostuijn, A., March 1996. The role, position and liability of the statutory auditor within the European Union, March, University of Limburg. Maastricht Accounting and Auditing Research Centre study prepared for DG XV of the European Commission