Array-gain constraint minimum-norm spatial filter with recursively updated gram matrix for biomagnetic source imaging

IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 57, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1358-1365

  Kumihashi, Isamu ^a   Sekihara, Kensuke ^a  

^a TOKYO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Biomagnetic source reconstruction; Magnetoencephalography (MEG); Minimum norm method; Minimum variance spatial filter; Source reconstruction; Spatial filter

Indexed keywords

GAIN CONSTRAINTS; GRAM MATRICES; MINIMUM-NORM METHODS; RECURSIVE PROCEDURE; SAMPLE COVARIANCE MATRIX; SAMPLE DATA; SOURCE CORRELATION; SOURCE IMAGING; SOURCE RECONSTRUCTION; SPATIAL FILTER; SPATIAL FILTERS; TIME SAMPLES;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; REPAIR;

COVARIANCE MATRIX;

ARTICLE; BIOMAGNETISM; COVARIANCE; FILTER; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; SIMULATION;

ALGORITHMS; AUDITORY CORTEX; BRAIN MAPPING; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 77952574090     PISSN: 00189294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2010.2040735     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. K. Sekihara and S. S. Nagarajan, Adaptive Spatial Filters for Electromagnetic Brain Imaging. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2008.
2. K. Sekihara, M. Sahani, and S. S. Nagarajan, "Location bias and spatial resolution of adaptive and non-adaptive spatial filters for MEG source reconstruction," NeuroImage, vol.25, pp. 1056-1067, 2005.
3. B. D. van Veen, W. van Drongelen, M. Yuchtman, and A. Suzuki, "Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol.44, no.9, pp. 867-880, Sep. 1997.
4. K. Sekihara, S. S. Nagarajan, D. Poeppel, and A. Marantz, "Performance of an MEG adaptive-beamformer technique in the presence of correlated neural activities: Effects on signal intensity and time-course estimates," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol.49, no.12, pp. 1534-1546, Dec. 2002.
5. S. S. Dalal, K. Sekihara, and S. S. Nagarajan, "Modified beamformers for coherent ref pubtitle region suppression," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol.53, no.7, pp. 1357-1363, Jul. 2006.
6. M. S. Hämäläinen and R. J. Ilmoniemi, "Interpreting measured magnetic fields of the brain: Estimates of current distributions," Helsinki Univ. Technol., Espoo, Finland, Tech. Rep. TKK-F-A559, 1984.
7. R. E.Greenblatt, A. Ossadtchi, andM. E. Pflieger, "Local linear estimators for the bioelectromagnetic inverse problem," IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol.53, no.9, pp. 3403-3412, Sep. 2005.
8. R.D. Pascual-Marqui, "Standardized lowresolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): Technical details," Methods Findings Exp. Clin. Pharmacol., vol.24, pp. 5-12, 2002.
9. J. Sarvas, "Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem," Phys. Med. Biol., vol.32, pp. 11-22, 1987.
10. R. Khemakhem, B. Hamida, A. Ahmed-Taleb, and P. Derambure, "New hybrid method for the 3d reconstruction of neuronal activity in the brain," in Proc. 15th Int. Conf. Syst., Signals Image Process., 2008, pp. 405-408.
11. K. Rafik, B. H. Ahmed, F. Imed, and T.-A. Abdelmalik, "Recursive sLORETA-FOCUSS algorithm for EEG dipoles localization," in Proc. Conf. Image Process. Theory, Tools Appl., Nov. 2008, pp. 1-5.