Genotypic variation in the postharvest performance and ethylene sensitivity of cut rose flowers

HortScience

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 790-796

  Macnish, Andrew J ^a   Leonard, Ria T ^a   Borda, Ana Maria ^a   Nell, Terril A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

1 methylcyclopropene; Abscission; Flower opening; Rosa hybrida; Senescence; Silver thiosulfate

Indexed keywords

ROSA ODORATA;

EID: 77952573155     PISSN: 00185345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.45.5.790     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ahmadi, N., H. Mibus, and M. Serek. 2009. Characterization of ethylene-induced organ abscission in F1 breeding lines of miniature roses (Rosa hybrida L.). Postharvest Biol. Technol. 52:260-266.
2. Bleecker, A.B. and H. Kende. 2000. Ethylene: A gaseous signal molecule in plants. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 16:1-18.
3. Cairns, T., M. Young, J. Adams, and B. Edberg. 2000. Modern roses XI: The world encyclopedia of roses. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
4. Cameron, A.C. and M.S. Reid. 2001. 1-MCP blocks ethylene-induced petal abscission of Pelargonium peltatum but the effect is transient. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 22:169-177.
5. Daly, J. and B. Kourelis. 2000. Synthesis methods, complexes and delivery methods for the safe and convenient storage, transport and application of compounds for inhibiting the ethylene response in plants. U.S. Patent 6017849.
6. Halevy, A.H. and S. Mayak. 1979. Senescence and postharvest physiology of cut flowers-Part 1. Hort. Rev. (Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.) 1: 204-236.
7. Kostansek, E.C. 2002. Delivery systems for cyclopropenes requiring less water. U.S. Patent 6426319.
8. Kuiper, D., H.S. van Reenen, and S.A. Ribot. 1996. Characterisation of flower bud opening in roses; a comparison of Madelon and Sonia roses. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 9:75-86.
9. Macnish, A.J., D.E. Irving, D.C. Joyce, V. Vithanage, A.H. Wearing, and A.T. Lisle. 2004a. Variation in ethylene-induced postharvest flower abscission responses among Chamelaucium Desf. (Myrtaceae) genotypes. Scientia Hort. 102: 415-432.
10. Macnish, A.J., D.C. Joyce, D.E. Irving, and A.H. Wearing. 2004b. A simple sustained release device for the ethylene binding inhibitor 1-methylcylcopropene. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 32:321-338.
11. Macnish, A.J., D.C. Joyce, P.J. Hofman, D.H. Simons, and M.S. Reid. 2000. 1-Methylcyclopropene treatment efficacy in preventing ethylene perception in banana fruit and grevillea and waxflower flowers. Aust. J. Exp. Agr. 40:471-481.
12. Muller, R., A.S. Andersen, and M. Serek. 1998. Differences in display life of miniature potted roses (Rosa hybrida L.). Scientia Hort. 76:59-71.
13. Muller, R., E.C. Sisler, and M. Serek. 2000. Stress induced ethylene production, ethylene binding, and the response to the ethylene action inhibitor 1-MCP in miniature roses. Scientia Hort. 83:51-59.
14. Nell, T.A. 1992. Taking silver safely out of the longevity picture. GrowerTalks June:35-42.
15. Newman, J.P., L.L. Dodge, and M.S. Reid. 1998. Evaluation of ethylene inhibitors for postharvest treatment of Gypsophila paniculata L. HortTechnology 8:58-63.
16. Nowak, J. and R.M. Rudnicki. 1990. Postharvest handling and storage of cut flowers, florist greens and potted plants. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
17. Onozaki, T., H. Ikeda, and T. Yamaguchi. 2001. Genetic improvement of vase life of carnation flowers by crossing and selection. Scientia Hort. 87:107-120.
18. Reid, M.S. and F.G. Celikel. 2008. Use of 1-methylcyclopropene in ornamentals: Carnations as a model system for understanding mode of action. HortScience 43:95-98.
19. Reid, M.S. and G.L. Staby. 2008. A brief history of 1-methylcyclopropene. HortScience 43: 83-85.
20. Reid, M.S., R.Y. Evans, L. Dodge, and Y. Mor. 1989. Ethylene and silver thiosulfate influence opening of cut rose flowers. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 114:436-440.
21. Serek, M. and M.S. Reid. 2000. Ethylene and postharvest performance of potted kalanchoe. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 18:43-48.
22. Serek, M., E.C. Sisler, and M.S. Reid. 1994. Novel gaseous ethylene binding inhibitor prevents ethylene effects in potted flowering plants. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 119:1230-1233.
23. Serek, M., E.C. Sisler, and M.S. Reid. 1995. Effects of 1-MCP on the vase life and ethylene response of cut flowers. Plant Growth Regulat. 16:93-97.
24. Skog, L.J., T. Blom, B. Schaefer, B. Digweed, H. Fraser, and W. Brown. 2001. A survey of ethylene contamination in Ontario's floriculture industry and the evaluation of 1-methyl-cyclopropene and an ethylene absorber as potential solutions. Acta Hort. 543:55-62.
25. Sun, Q., T.L. Rost, M.S. Reid, and M.A. Matthews. 2007. Ethylene and not embolism is required for wound-induced tylose development in stems of grapevines. Plant Physiol. 145:1629-1636.
26. Tan, H., X. Liu, N. Ma, J. Xue, W. Lu, J. Bai, and J. Gao. 2006. Ethylene-influenced flower opening and expression of genes encoding Etrs, Ctrs, and Ein3s in two cut rose cultivars. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 40:97-105.
27. van Doorn, W.G. 2001. Categories of petal senescence and abscission: A re-evaluation. Ann. Bot. (Lond.) 87:447-456.
28. van Doorn, W.G., H. Harkema, and E. Otma. 1991. Is vascular blockage in stems of cut lilac flowers mediated by ethylene? Acta Hort. 298:177-181.
29. Woltering, E.J. and W.G. van Doorn. 1988. Role of ethylene in senescence of petals-Morphological and taxonomical relationships. J. Expt. Bot. 39:1605-1616.
30. Wu, M.J., W.G. van Doorn, and M.S. Reid. 1991a. Variation in the senescence of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) cultivars. I. Comparison of flower life, respiration and ethylene biosynthesis. Scientia Hort. 48:99-107.
31. Wu, M.J., L. Zacarias, and M.S. Reid. 1991b. Variation in the senescence of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) cultivars. II. Comparison of sensitivity to exogenous ethylene and of ethylene binding. Scientia Hort. 48:109-116.
32. Xue, J., F. Yang, and J. Gao. 2009. Isolation of Rh-TIP1;1, an aquaporin gene and its expression in rose flowers in response to ethylene and water deficit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 51: 407-413.