Can irrational become unconstitutional? nclb's 100% presuppositions

Equity and Excellence in Education

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 171-179

  Welner, Kevin G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952564875     PISSN: 10665684     EISSN: 15473457     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10665680591002470     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Armor, D. J. (1972). School and family effects on black and white achievement: A reexamination of the USOE data. In F. Mosteller & D. P. Moynihan (Eds.), On equality of educational opportunity (pp. 168-229). New York: Random House.
2. Barnett, W. S. (2002). Early childhood education. In A. Molnar (Ed.), School reform proposals: The research evidence. Retrieved February 4, 2005, from http://www.asu.edu/educ/epsl/EPRU/documents/EPRU% 202002-107/EPSL-0202-107-EPRU.pdf
3. Burris, C. C., & Welner, K. G. (2005). Closing the achievement gap by detracking. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(8), 594-598.
4. Bush, G. W. (2004, September 2). Acceptance speech at the 2004 Republican National Convention. Retrieved February 4, 2005, from http://uspolitics. about.com/od/speeches/a/bush speech p.htm
5. Civil Rights Act of 1964. (1964). Pub. L. No. 88-352, 78 Stat. 252, 42 U.S.C. §§2000e et seq.
6. Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, U.S. Government Printing Office.
7. Elementary and Secondary Education Act. (1965). Pub. L. No. 89-10, 79 Stat. 27, 20 U.S.C. §§6301 et seq.
8. Executive Order No. 12,291. (1981). 3 C.F.R. 127.
9. Executive Order No. 12,866. (1993). 3 C.F.R. 638.
10. Executive Order No. 13,258. (2002). 3 C.F.R. 204.
11. Federal Register. (2004, June 24). Vol. 69, No. 121.
12. Garfield v. United States. (1908). 211 U.S. 249, 29 S.Ct. 62, 53 L.Ed. 168.
13. Gest, J. (2005, April 23). Texas fined for No Child defiance. Houston Chronicle, p. A01.
14. GI Forum v. Texas Education Agency. (2000). 87 F.Supp.2d 667 (W.D.Tex.).
15. Grissmer, D.W., Flanagan, A. E., Kawata, J. H., & Williamson, S. (2000). Improving student achievement: What state NAEP test scores tell us. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
16. Hanushek, E. A. (1989). The impact of differential expenditures on school performance. Educational Researcher, 18(4), 45-51, 62.
17. Harrah Indep. School District v. Martin. (1979). 440 U.S. 194, 99 S. Ct. 1062, 59 L. Ed. 2d 248.
18. Helfand, D. (2005, June 2). 10 Districts Sue State Over Testing. Los Angeles Times, p. B4.
19. Hoff, D. J. (2005, April 13). States to get new options on NCLB law. Education Week, 24(31), 1, 38.
20. Hoxby, C.M. (2003). School choice and school competition: Evidence fromthe United States. Swedish Economic Policy Review (p. 10).
21. Improving America's Schools Act. (1994). Pub. L. No. 103-382, 108 Stat. 3518, 20 U.S.C. §6301 note.
22. Kune, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2001). Volatility in school test scores: Implications for test-based accountability systems. Paper presented at a Brookings Institution Conference. Later published in Brookings Papers on Education Policy (2002), pp. 235-283.
23. Lee, J., (2004, April 7). How feasible is adequate yearly progress (AYP)? Simulations of school AYP "uniform averaging'' and "safe harbor'' under the No Child Left Behind Act. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(14). Retrieved February 4, 2005, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n14/
24. Linn, R. L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29(2), 4-16.
25. Linn, R. L. (2003). Accountability: Responsibility and reasonable expectations. CSE report 601. Boulder, CO: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
26. Linn, R. L. (2004). Rethinking the No Child Left Behind accountability system. Paper presented at a forum sponsored by the Center on Education Policy, Washington, DC. Retrieved February 4, 2005 from http://www. ctredpol. org/pubs/Forum28July2004/BobLinnPaper.pdf
27. Linn, R. L., Baker, E. L., & Betebenner, D. W. (2002). Accountability systems: Implications of the requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Educational Researcher, 31(6), 3-16.
28. Mahr, C. (2005, April 14). Another district joins No Child Left Behind suit. The Desert Sun. Retrieved April 18, 2005, from http://www.thedesertsun.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050414/NEWS04/50414032 8/1006
29. Marcosson, S. A. (2001). Constructive immutability. 3 University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 646.
30. Mathews, J. (2003, November 11). No Child Left Behind Act: Facts and fiction. Washington Post, p. A08.
31. McColl, A. (2005). Tough call: Is No Child Left Behind constitutional? Phi Delta Kappan, 86(8), 604-610.
32. McNeil, L. & Valenzuela, A. (2001). The harmful impact of the TAAS system of testing in Texas: Beneath the accountability rhetoric. In G. Orfield & M. L. Kornhaber (Eds.), Raising standards or raising barriers? Inequality and high-stakes testing in public education (pp. 127-150). New York: Century Foundation Press.
33. National Conference of State Legislatures. (2005). Task force on No Child Left Behind: Final report. Denver, CO: Author.
34. Nicholas v. Pennsylvania State University. (2000). 227 F.3d 133 (3rd Cir.).
35. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (2002). Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425, 20 U.S.C. §§6301 et seq.
36. Office of Management and Budget. (1996). Economic analysis of federal regulations Under Executive Order No. 12866. Washington, DC: Author.
37. Ogus, A. (1998). Regulatory appraisal:Aneglected opportunity for law and economics. 6 European Journal of Law and Economics 53.
38. Paige, R. (2004, March 29). Secretary Paige issues new policy for calculating participation rates under No Child Left Behind. Retrieved February 4, 2005, from http://www. ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2004/03/03292004.html
39. Plyler v. Doe. (1982). 457 U.S. 202, 102 S.Ct. 2382, 72 L.Ed.2d 786.
40. Reading School District v. Pennsylvania Department of Education. (2004, August 6). No. 03-2685 (Pa).
41. Richardson v. Lamar County Board of Education. (1989). 729 F. Supp. 806 (M.D.Ala.).
42. Rothstein, R. (2002). Out of balance: Our understanding of how schools affect society and how society affects schools. [Electronic version]. http://www.spencer.org/publications/conferences/traditions of scholarships/traditions of scholships.pdf
43. South Dakota v. Dole. (1987). 483 U.S. 203, 107 S. Ct. 2793; 97 L.Ed.2d 171.
44. St. Louis Teachers Union v. Board of Education. (1987). 652 F. Supp. 425 (E.D.Mo.).
45. United States v. Carolene Prods. Co. (1938). 304 U.S. 144, 58 S.Ct. 778, 82 L.Ed. 1234.
46. Walberg, H. J. (1984). Families as partners in educational productivity. Phi Delta Kappan, 65(6), 397-400.
47. Welner, K. G., & Weitzman, D. Q. (2005). The soft bigotry of low expenditures. Equity and Excellence in Education, 38(3), 242-248.
48. Will, G. (2001, February 1). Tall order for a few federal dollars. Washington Post, A21.