Cheminformatics approaches to analyze diversity in compound screening libraries

Current Opinion in Chemical Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 325-330

  Akella, Lakshmi B ^a   DeCaprio, David ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MOLECULAR SCAFFOLD;

ARTIFACT; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPARATIVE MOLECULAR SIMILARITY INDICES ANALYSIS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; MOLECULAR LIBRARY; MOLECULAR SIZE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; STRUCTURAL BIOINFORMATICS;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DRUG DISCOVERY; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING ASSAYS; SMALL MOLECULE LIBRARIES;

EID: 77952552641     PISSN: 13675931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.03.017     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Payne D.J., Gwynn M.N., Holmes D.J., and Pompliano D.L. Drugs for bad bugs: confronting the challenges of antibacterial discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 6 (2007) 29-40
2. Macarron R. Critical review of the role of HTS in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today 11 (2006) 277-279
3. Balakin K.V., and Bovina E.V. Chemogenomics-based design of GPCR-targeted libraries using data mining techniques. In: Balakin K.V., and Ekins S. (Eds). Pharmaceutical Data Mining: Approaches and Applications for Drug Discovery (2009), Wiley 175-204
4. Zhang J., Yang P.L., and Gray N.S. Targeting cancer with small molecule kinase inhibitors. Nat Rev Cancer 9 (2009) 28-39
5. Webb T.R., Venegas R.E., Wang J., and Deschenes A. Generation of new synthetic scaffolds using framework libraries selected and refined via medicinal chemist synthetic expertise. J Chem Inf Model 48 (2008) 882-888
6. Wang Y., Xiao J., Suzek T.O., Zhang J., Wang J., and Bryant S.H. PubChem: a public information system for analyzing bioactivities of small molecules. Nucleic Acids Res 37 (2009) W623-W633
7. Wetzel S., Schuffenhauer A., Roggo S., Ertl P., and Waldmann H. Cheminformatic analysis of natural products and their chemical space. Chimia 61 (2007) 355-360
8. Singh N., Guha R., Giulianotti M.A., Pinilla C., Houghten R.A., and Medina-Franco J.L. Chemoinformatic analysis of combinatorial libraries, drugs, natural products, and molecular libraries small molecule repository. J Chem Inf Model 49 (2009) 1010-1024
9. Bender A., Jenkins J.L., Scheiber J., Sukuru S.C.K., Glick M., and Davies J.W. How similar are similarity searching methods? A principal component analysis of molecular descriptor space. J Chem Inf Model 49 (2009) 108-119
10. Rupp M., Schneider P., and Schneider G. Distance phenomena in high-dimensional chemical descriptor spaces: consequences for similarity-based approaches. J Comput Chem 30 (2009) 2285-2296
11. Sykora V.J., and Leahy D.E. Chemical descriptors library (CDL): a generic, open source software library for chemical informatics. J Chem Inf Model 48 (2008) 1931-1942
12. O'Boyle N.M., and Hutchison G.R. Cinfony - combining open source cheminformatics toolkits behind a common interface. Chem Central J 2 (2008) 24
13. Guha R. Chemical informatics functionality in R. J Stat Softw 18 5 (2007) 1-16
14. Steinbeck C., Hoppe C., Kuhn S., Floris M., Guha R., and Willighagen E.L. Recent developments of the chemistry development kit (CDK): an open-source java library for chemo- and bioinformatics. Curr Pharm Des 12 (2006) 2111-2120
15. Larsson J., Gottfries J., Muresan S., and Backlund A. ChemGPS-NP: tuned for navigation in biologically relevant chemical space. J Nat Prod 70 (2007) 789-794
16. Fink T., and Reymond J.L. Virtual exploration of the chemical universe up to 11 atoms of C, N, O, F: assembly of 26.4 million structures (110.9 million stereoisomers) and analysis for new ring systems, stereochemistry, physicochemical properties, compound classes, and drug discovery. J Chem Inf Model 47 (2007) 342-353
17. Schneider P., Tanrikulu Y., and Schneider G. Self-organizing maps in drug discovery: compound library design, scaffold-hopping, repurposing. Curr Med Chem 16 (2009) 258-266
18. Sauer W.H.B., and Schwarz M.K. Molecular shape diversity of combinatorial libraries: a prerequisite for broad bioactivity. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 43 (2003) 987-1003
19. Akritopoulou-Zanze I., Metz J.T., and Djuric S.W. Topography-biased compound library design: the shape of things to come?. Drug Discov Today 12 (2007) 948-952
20. Fitzgerald S.H., Sabat M., and Geysen H.M. Diversity space and its application to library selection and design. J Chem Inf Model 46 (2006) 1588-1597
21. Fitzgerald S.H., Sabat M., and Geysen H.M. Survey of the diversity space coverage of reported combinatorial libraries. J Comb Chem 9 (2007) 724-734
22. Medina-Franco J.L., Maggiora G.M., Giulianotti M.A., Pinilla C., and Houghten R.A. A similarity-based data-fusion approach to the visual characterization and comparison of compound databases. Chem Biol Drug Des 70 (2007) 393-412. Presents multi-fusion similarity maps for comparing compound libraries and demonstrates applications of these visualizations in analysis of compound sets.
23. Koch M.A., Schuffenhauer A., Scheck M., Wetzel S., Casaulta M., Odermatt A., Ertl P., Waldmann H., and Lerner R.A. Charting biologically relevant chemical space: a structural classification of natural products (SCONP). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102 (2005) 17272-17277
24. Morton D., Leach S., Cordier C., Warriner S., and Nelson A. Synthesis of natural-product-like molecules with over eighty distinct scaffolds. Angew Chem Int Ed 48 (2008) 104-109
25. Schuffenhauer A., Ertl P., Roggo S., Wetzel S., Koch M.A., and Waldmann H. The scaffold tree-visualization of the scaffold universe by hierarchical scaffold classification. J Chem Inf Model 47 (2007) 47-58
26. Hert J., Irwin J.J., Laggner C., Keiser M.J., and Shoichet B.K. Quantifying biogenic bias in screening libraries. Nat Chem Biol 5 (2009) 479-483. An examination of ring scaffolds in natural products and a comparison with those available in existing combinatorial libraries.
27. Dandapani S., and Marcaurelle L. Current strategies for diversity-oriented synthesis. Curr Opin Chem Biol 14 (2010) 362-370
28. Cordier C., Morton D., Murrison S., Nelson A., and O'Leary-Steele C. Natural products as an inspiration in the diversity-oriented synthesis of bioactive compound libraries. Nat Prod Rep 25 (2008) 719-737
29. Ertl P., Roggo S., and Schuffenhauer A. Natural product-likeness score and its application for prioritization of compound libraries. J Chem Inf Model 48 (2008) 68-74
30. Lovering F., Bikker J., and Humblet C. Escape from flatland: Increasing saturation as an approach to improving clinical success. J Med Chem 52 (2009) 6752-6756. Presents two chemical descriptors related to carbon saturation and demonstrates that increased saturation correlates with clinical success.
31. Wang Y., Geppert H., and Bajorath J. Shannon entropy-based fingerprint similarity search strategy. J Chem Inf Model 49 (2009) 1687-1691
32. Simeonov A., Jadhav A., Thomas C.J., Wang Y., Huang R., Southall N.T., Shinn P., Smith J., Austin C.P., Auld D.S., et al. Fluorescence spectroscopic profiling of compound libraries. J Med Chem 51 (2008) 2363-2371
33. Feng B.Y., Simeonov A., Jadhav A., Babaoglu K., Inglese J., Shoichet B.K., and Austin C.P. A high-throughput screen for aggregation-based inhibition in a large compound library. J Med Chem 50 (2007) 2385-2390
34. Babaoglu K., Simeonov A., Irwin J.J., Nelson M.E., Feng B., Thomas C.J., Cancian L., Costi M.P., Maltby D.A., Jadhav A., et al. Comprehensive mechanistic analysis of hits from high-throughput and docking screens against β-lactamase. J Med Chem 51 (2008) 2502-2511. Comprehensive analysis of the hits from a high-throughput screen to identify their mechanism of action and comparison of HTS with a molecular docking.
35. Auld D.S., Southall N.T., Jadhav A., Johnson R.L., Diller D.J., Simeonov A., Austin C.P., and Inglese J. Characterization of chemical libraries for luciferase inhibitory activity. J Med Chem 51 (2008) 2372-2386
36. Auld D.S., Zhang Y.Q., Southall N.T., Rai G., Landsman M., MacLure J., Langevin D., Thomas C.J., Austin C.P., and Inglese J. A basis for reduced chemical library inhibition of firefly luciferase obtained from directed evolution. J Med Chem 52 (2009) 1450-1458
37. Auld D.S., Thorne N., Nguyen D.T., and Inglese J. A specific mechanism for non-specific activation in reporter-gene assays. ACS Chem Biol 3 (2008) 463-470
38. Han L., Wang Y., and Bryant S.H. A survey of across-target bioactivity results of small molecules in PubChem. Bioinformatics 25 (2009) 2251-2255
39. Crisman T.J., Parker C.N., Jenkins J.L., Scheiber J., Thoma M., Kang Z.B., Kim R., Bender A., Nettles J.H., Davies J.W., et al. Understanding false positives in reporter gene assays: in silico chemogenomics approaches to prioritize cell-based HTS data. J Chem Inf Model 47 (2007) 1319-1327
40. Baell J.B., and Holloway G.A. New substructure filters for removal of Pan Assay Interference Compounds (PAINS) from screening libraries and for their exclusion in bioassays. J Med Chem 53 (2010) 2719-2740. Describes number of substructure filters which identify compounds that are frequent hitters in bioassays and need to be excluded for further development.
41. Adams J.C., Keiser M.J., Basuino L., Chambers H.F., Lee D.S., Wiest O.G., and Babbitt P.C. A mapping of drug space from the viewpoint of small molecule metabolism. PLoS Comput Biol 5 (2009) e1000474
42. Scheiber J., Jenkins J.L., Sukuru S.C., Bender A., Mikhailov D., Milik M., Azzaoui K., Whitebread S., Hamon J., Urban L., et al. Mapping adverse drug reactions in chemical space. J Med Chem 52 (2009) 3103-3107
43. Wawer M., Peltason L., and Bajorath J. Elucidation of structure-activity relationship pathways in biological screening data. J Med Chem 52 (2009) 1075-1080
44. Wawer M., Peltason L., and Bajorath J. SARANEA: A freely available program to mine structure-activity and structure-selectivity relationship information in compound data sets. J Chem Inf Model 50 (2010) 68-78