Water management and biodiversity conservation interface in Mexico: A geographical analysis

Applied Geography

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 343-354

  Díaz Caravantes, Rolando E ^a,b   Scott, Christopher A ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE CIUDAD JUÁREZ   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Conservation; Institutional policy; Mexico; Spatial analysis; Water

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; DRAINAGE BASIN; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; GIS; GROUNDWATER; MAPPING METHOD; NATURE CONSERVATION; PROTECTED AREA; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATERSHED;

MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA];

EID: 77952551791     PISSN: 01436228     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Al-Adamat R., Foster I., Baban S. Groundwater vulnerability and risk mapping for the Basaltic aquifer of the Azraq basin of Jordan using GIS, Remote sensing and DRASTIC. Applied Geography 2003, 23(4):303-324.
2. Apan A., Peterson J. Probing tropical deforestation: use of GIS and statistical analysis of georeferenced data. Applied Geography 1998, 18(2):137-152.
3. Baxter M.J., Beardah C.C. Some archaeological applications of kernel density estimates. Journal of Archaeological Science 1997, 24:347-354.
4. Blalock H. Social statistics 1979, McGraw-Hill, New York.
5. Bonham-Carter G. Geographic information systems for geoscientists: Modelling with GIS 1994, Pergamon, Oxford, New York.
6. Brechin S.R. Contested nature: Promoting international biodiversity conservation with social justice in the twenty-first century 2003, State University of New Your Press, Albany.
7. Carabias J., Landa R. Agua, medio ambiente y sociedad: Hacia la gestión integral de los recursos hídricos en México 2005, UNAM & El Colegio de México, México.
8. CONAGUA, Comisión Nacional del Agua. (2005). Determinación de la disponibilidad de agua en el acuífero Cuchujaqui, Álamos, Estado de Sonora. Not Published, Produced in Sonora, México.
9. CONAGUA, Comisión Nacional del Agua Trámites y Servicios 2009, Retrieved February 27, 2009, from. http://www.cna.gob.mx.
10. CONANP, Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas ¿Que son las ap 2009, Retrieved February 27, 2009, from. http://www.conanp.gob.mx/q_anp.htm.
11. Conca K. Governing water: Contentious transnational politics and global institution building 2006, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
12. Cosgrove W., Rijsberman F. World water vision: Making water everybody's business, for the world water council 2000, Earthscan, London, Executive summary.
13. Dixon B. Groundwater vulnerability mapping: a GIS and fuzzy rule based integrated tool. Applied Geography 2005, 25(4):327-347.
14. Escobar A. Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world 1995, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
15. Garduño H. Lessons from implementing water rights in Mexico. Water rights reform: Lessons for institutional design 2005, 85-112. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC. B.R. Bruns, C. Ringler, R. Meinzen-Dick (Eds.).
16. Gleick P., Wolff G., Chalecki E., Reyes R. The risks and benefits of globalization and privatization of fresh water 2002, Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment, and Security.
17. Guha R. Environmentalism: A global history 2000, Longman, New York.
18. INEGI, Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. (2005). Conteo de Población y Vivienda.
19. LAN, Mexican Congress Ley de Aguas Nacionales Mexico D.F. Retrieved July 1, 2008, from. http://www.cddhcu.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/16.pdf.
20. McNaught D., Rudek J., Spalt E. Riparian buffers: common sense protection for North Carolina's water Produced by Environmental Defense, United States. Retrieved February 28, 2009, from. http://www.environmentaldefense.org.
21. Millward A.A., Kraft C.E. Physical influences of landscape on a large-extent ecological disturbance: the northeastern North American ice storm of 1998. Landscape Ecology 2004, 19:99-111.
22. Moreno Vásquez J.L. Por abajo del agua: Sobreexplotación y agotamiento del acuífero de la Costa de Hermosillo, 1945-2005 2006, El Colegio de Sonora, Hermosillo.
23. Morris D., Ross K., Johannsen C. The characterization of soil properties to develop soil management/mapping units using high-resolution remotely sensed data sets. Journal of Terrestrial Observation 2008, 1(1):5-37. Retrieved February 28, 2009, from Academic Search Complete database.
24. NPA Regulation, Mexican Congress Reglamento de la ley general del equilibrio ecológico y la protección al ambiente en materia de áreas naturales protegidas México D.F., México. Retrieved July 1, 2008, from. http://www.cddhcu.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/regley/Reg_LGEEPA_ANP.pdf.
25. Pitt J., Luecke D., Cohen M., Glenn E., Valdes-Casillas C. Two nations, one river: managing ecosystem conservation in the Colorado river delta. Natural Resources Journal 2000, 40:819.
26. Postel S., Richter B. Rivers for life: Managing water for people and nature 2003, Island Press, Washington, DC.
27. Presumpscot River Management Plan Steering Committee Protecting and enhancing open space along the Presumpscot river 2003, Casco Bay Estuary Project/The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, New England, Retrieved February 28, 2009, from. http://www.presumpscotcoalition.org/habitat.html.
28. Rahman A. A GIS based DRASTIC model for assessing groundwater vulnerability in shallow aquifer in Aligarh, India. Applied Geography 2008, 28(1):32-53.
29. Rojero Díaz E. Problemática ambiental en la cuenca alta del rio cuchujaqui: Hacía una propuesta de gestión 2008, Tesis de El Colegio de Sonora.
30. Scott C.A., Banister J.M. The dilemma of water management " regionalization" in Mexico under centralized resource allocation. International Journal of Water Resources Development 2008, 24(1):61-74. 10.1080/07900620701723083.
31. Scott, C. A., Dall'erba, S., & Díaz-Caravantes, R. Groundwater rights in Mexican agriculture: spatial distribution and demographic determinants. The Professional Geographer, forthcoming.
32. Shah T. Taming the anarchy: Groundwater governance in South Asia 2009, RFF Press, Washington, DC.
33. Shaw G., Wheeler D. Statistical techniques in geographical analysis 1994, David Fulton, London.
34. Silverman B.W. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis 1986, Chapman and Hall, New York.
35. Stueve K., Lafon C., Isaacs R. Spatial patterns of ice storm disturbance on a forested landscape in the Appalachian mountains, Virginia. Area 2007, 39(1):20-30. Retrieved February 28, 2009. 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00722.x.
36. Van der Zaag P. Asymmetry and equity in water resources management; critical institutional issues for southern Africa. Water Resources Management 2007, 21(12):1993-2004. Retrieved February 28, 2009, from. http://www.springerlink.com/content/m0650686k3kj5287/.
37. WCD, World Commission on Dams " Overview," dams and development: A new framework for decision-making 2000, Retrieved February 28, 2009, from. http://www.dams.org.
38. Wenger S.J., Fowler L. Protecting stream and river corridors creating effective local riparian buffer ordinances 2000, Carl Vinson Institute of Government, University of Georgia, USA.
39. World Bank Mexico, protected areas program: Proposed restructuring project, global environment division 1997, Washington DC.
40. World Bank Proposed supplemental GEF grant 2004, Washington DC.
41. Zar J. Biostatistical analysis 1999, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
42. Zimmerer K. Conclusion: rethinking the compatibility, consequences, and geographic strategies of conservation and development. Globalization and new geographies of conservation 2006, 315-346. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. K. Zimmerer (Ed.).