Psychometric comparisons of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 and Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 435-443

  Lin, Keh Chung ^a,b   Fu, Tiffany ^a   Wu, Ching Yi ^c   Hsieh, Yu Wei ^a   Chen, Chia Ling ^d   Lee, Pei Chin ^e  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^c CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d CHANG GUNG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^e CHUNG SHAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Cerebrovascular accident; Outcome measures; Psychometrics; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; REPRODUCIBILITY; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; STROKE; WALKING DIFFICULTY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOBILITY LIMITATION; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; STROKE;

EID: 77952546037     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-010-9597-5     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Saxena, S. K. (2006). Prevalence and correlates of cognitive impairment in stroke patients in a rehabilitation setting. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 10, 37-47.
2. Stephens, S., Kenny, R. A., Rowan, E., Kalaria, R. N., Bradbury, M., Pearce, R., et al. (2005). Association between mild vascular cognitive impairment and impaired activities of daily living in older stroke survivors without dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, 103-107.
3. Salter, K. L., Moses, M. B., Foley, N. C., & Teasell, R. W. (2008). Health-related quality of life after stroke: What are we measuring? International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 31, 111-117.
4. Schepers, V. P. M., Ketelaar, M., van de Port, I. G. L., Visser-Meily, J. M. A., & Lindeman, E. (2007). Comparing contents of functional outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation using the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29, 221-230.
5. Lin, K. C., Chang, Y. F., Wu, C. Y., & Chen, Y. A. (2009). Effects of constraint-induced therapy versus bilateral arm training on motor performance, daily functions and quality of life in stroke survivors. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23, 441-448.
6. Lin, K. C., Wu, C. Y., Liu, J. S., Chen, Y. T., & Hsu, C. J. (2009). Constraint-induced therapy versus dose-matched control intervention to improve motor ability, basic/extended daily functions and quality of life in stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23, 160-165.
7. Czechowsky, D., & Hill, M. D. (2002). Neurological outcome and quality of life after stroke due to vertebral artery dissection. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 13, 192-197.
8. Erban, P., Woertgen, C., Luerding, R., Bogdahn, U., Schlachetzki, F., & Horn, M. (2006). Long-term outcome after hemicraniectomy for space occupying right hemispheric MCA infarction. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 108, 384-387.
9. Duncan, P. W., Wallace, D., Lai, S. M., Johnson, D., Embretson, S., & Laster, L. J. (1999). The Stroke Impact Scale version 2.0: Evaluation of reliability, validity and sensitivity to change. Stroke, 30, 2131-2140.
10. Duncan, P. W., Bode, R. K., Lai, S. M., & Perera, S. (2003). Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: The Stroke Impact Scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 950-963.
11. Duncan, P. W., Jorgensen, H. S., & Wade, D. T. (2000). Outcome measures in acute stroke trials. A systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. Stroke, 31, 1429-1438.
12. Williams, L. S., Weinberger, M., Harris, L. E., Clark, D. O., & Biller, J. (1999). Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale. Stroke, 30, 1362-1369.
13. Carod-Artal, F. J., Coral, L. F., Trizotto, D. S., & Moreira, C. M. (2008). The Stroke Impact Scale 3.0: Evaluation of acceptability, reliability and validity of theBrazilian version. Stroke, 39, 2477-2484.
14. Duncan, P., Reker, D., Kwon, S., Lai, S. M., Studenski, S., Perera, S., et al. (2005). Measuring stroke impact with the Stroke Impact Scale. Telephone versus mail administration in veterans with stroke. Medical Care, 43, 507-515.
15. Kwon, S., Duncan, P., Studenski, S., Perera, S., Lai, S.M.,& Reker, D. (2006). Measuring stroke impact with SIS: Construct validity of SIS telephone administration.Quality of Life Research, 15, 367-376.
16. Muus, I., Williams, L. S., & Ringsberg, K. C. (2007). Validation of the stroke specific quality of life scale (SS-QOL): Test of reliability and validity of the Danish version (SS-QOL-DK). Clinical Rehabilitation, 21, 620-627.
17. Ewert, T., & Stucki, G. (2007). Validity of the SS-QOL in Germany and in survivors of hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 21, 161-168.
18. Shaikh, N., Marin, J. M., Casey, J. R., Pichichero, M. E., Wald, E. R., Colborn, D. K., et al. (2009). Development of a patientreported outcome measure for children with streptococcal pharyngitis. Pediatrics, 124, e557-e563.
19. Fayers, P. M., & Machin, D. (2007). Quality of life-the assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. New York: Wiley.
20. Taub, E., Miller, N. E., Novack, T. A., Cook, E. W., 3rd, Fleming, W. C., Nepomuceno, C. S., et al. (1993). Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74, 347-354.
21. McCombe Waller, S., & Whitall, J. (2008). Bilateral arm training: Why and who benefits? NeuroRehabilitation, 23, 29-41.
22. Wolf, S. L., Winstein, C. J., Miller, J. P., Taub, E., Uswatte, G., Morris, D., et al. (2006). Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: The EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 296, 2095-2104.
23. Lin, K. C., Chen, Y. A., Chen, C. L., Wu, C. Y., & Chang, Y. A. (2010). The effects of bilateral arm training on motor control and functional performance in chronic stroke: A randomized controlled study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 24, 42-51.
24. Barnes, M. P., Dobkin, B. H., & Bogousslavsky, J. (2009). Recovery after stroke. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Brunnstrom, S. (1970). Movement therapy in hemiplegia. New York: Harper & Row.
26. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Minimental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198.
27. Bohannon, R., & Smith, M. (1987). Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Physical Therapy, 67, 206-207.
28. Fugl-Meyer, A. R., Jaasko, L., Leyman, I., Olsson, S., & Steglind, S. (1975). The poststroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 7, 13-31.
29. Granger, C. V., & Hamilton, B. B. (1993). The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation report of first admissions for 1991. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 72, 33-38.
30. Holbrook, M., & Skilbeck, C. E. (1983). An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age and Ageing, 12, 166-170.
31. Nouri, F. M., & Lincoln, N. B. (1987). An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation, 1, 301-305
32. Hays, R. D., Anderson, R., & Revicki, D. (1998). Chapter 10: Assessing Reliability and Validity of Measurement in Clinical Trials. In M. J. Staquet, R. D. Hays, & P. M. Fayers (Eds.), Quality of life assessments in clinical trials (pp. 169-182). New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Kotsis, S. V., Chung, K. C., & Arbor, A. (2005). Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire in carpal tunnel surgery. Journal of Hand Surgery, 30A, 81-86.
34. Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Yeo, D., Mantel, H., & Liu, T. P. (1999). Bootstrap variance estimation for the National Population Health Survey. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section. Baltimore: American Statistical Association.
36. Stratford, P. W., & Kennedy, D. M. (2004). Does parallel item content on WOMAC's pain and function subscales limit its ability to detect change in functional status? BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 5, 17.
37. Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2009). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
38. Cano, S. J., O'Connor, R. J., Thompson, A. J., & Hobart, J. C. (2006). Exploring disability rating scale responsiveness II: Do more response options help? Neurology, 67, 2056-2059.
39. Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2007). Statistics for the behavioral sciences (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
40. Hobart, J. C., Lamping, D. L., Freeman, J. A., Langdon, D. W., McLellan, D. L., Greenwood, R. J., et al. (2001). Evidence-based measurement. Which disability scale for neurologic rehabilitation? Neurology, 57, 639-644.
41. Moran, L. A., Guyatt, G. H., & Norman, G. R. (2001). Establishing the minimal number of items for a responsive, valid, health-related quality of life instrument. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54, 571-579.
42. Kong, K. H., & Yang, S. Y. (2006). Health-related quality of life among chronic stroke survivors attending a rehabilitation clinic. Singapore Medical Journal, 47, 213-218.
43. Berg, A., Lonnqvist, J., Palomaki, H., & Kaste, M. (2009). Assessment of depression after stroke: A comparison of different screening instruments. Stroke, 40, 523-529.