Giftedness and Complexity in a Self-Directed Computer-Based Task

Gifted and Talented International

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 83-89

  Maniatis, Eustathia ^a   Cartwright, Glenn F ^b   Shore, Bruce M ^b  

^a Crestview Elementary School   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952517479     PISSN: 15332276     EISSN: 24709565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15332276.1998.11672891     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Barron, F., (1958). The psychology of imagination. Scientific American, 199, 150–166.
2. Beardsley, T., (1998). Trends in neuroscience: The machinery of thought. Scientific American, 277 (2), 78–83.
3. Bowen, S., Shore, B. M., & Cartwright, G. F., (1992). Do gifted children use computers differently? Gifted Education International, 8, 151–154.
4. Chi, M. T. H., & Glaser, R., (1985). Problem solving ability. In R. J., Sternberg (Ed.), Human abilities: An information processing approach (pp. 227–250). New York: Freeman.
5. Dover, A., & Shore, B. M., (1991). Giftedness and flexibility on a mathematical set-breaking task. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 99–105.
6. Getzels, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M., (1976). A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. The creative vision. New York: Wiley.
7. Heller, K. A., (1993). Scientific ability. In G. R., Bock & K., Ackrill (Eds.), The origins and development of high ability (pp. 139–150; 139-159 including commentary). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
8. Heller, K. A., Mönks, F. J., & Passow, A. H., (1993). International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent. Oxford: Pergamon.
9. Horowitz, F. D., & O’Brien, M., (Eds.). (1985). The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10. Jaušovec, N., (1994). Flexible thinking: An explanation of individual differences in ability. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
11. Kaizer, C., & Shore, B. M., (1995). Strategy flexibility in more and less competent students on mathematical word problems. Creativity Research Journal, 8 (1), 77–82.
12. Kiess, H. O., (1996). Statistical concepts for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
13. Maker, C. J., (1982). Curriculum development for the gifted. Rockville, MD: Aspen.
14. Pelletier, S., & Shore, B. M., (in press). The gifted learner, the novice, and the expert: Sharpening emerging views of giftedness. In A. J., Tannenbaum, L., Cohen, & D. C., Ambrose (Eds.), Toward a theory of creative intelligence. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
15. Shore, B. M., (in press). Metacognition and flexibility as a part of a redefinition of high ability. In R. C., Friedman & B. M., Shore (Eds.), Talents within: Cognition and development. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16. Shore, B. M., & Kanevsky, L. S., (1993). Thinking processes: Being and becoming gifted. In K. A., Heller, F. J., Mönks, & A. H., Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 133–147). Oxford: Pergamon.
17. Shore, R M., Cornell, D. G., Robinson, A., & Ward, V., (1991). Recommended practices in gifted education: A critical analysis. New York: Teachers College Press.
18. Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E., (Eds.). (1986). Conceptions of giftedness. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.