In vivo tibiofemoral cartilage deformation during the stance phase of gait

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 658-665

  Liu, Fang ^a   Kozanek, Michal ^a   Hosseini, Ali ^a,b   Van de Velde, Samuel K ^a   Gill, Thomas J ^a   Rubash, Harry E ^a   Li, Guoan ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

Author keywords

Cartilage; Deformation; Gait; Stance phase; Treadmill

Indexed keywords

ANTEROPOSTERIOR; ARTICULAR CARTILAGES; CARTILAGE PATHOLOGY; CARTILAGE THICKNESS; CONTACT AREAS; CONTACT DEFORMATION; FLUOROSCOPIC IMAGES; GAIT; IN-VITRO; IN-VIVO; KNEE JOINT; MEDIAL COMPARTMENT; MR IMAGES; STANCE PHASE;

BIOMECHANICS; BIOPHYSICS; BONE; DEFORMATION; EXERCISE EQUIPMENT; JOINTS (ANATOMY); LOADING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; SPORTING GOODS;

CARTILAGE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPRESSION; CONTACT STRESS; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; GAIT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IN VIVO STUDY; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREADMILL EXERCISE; WEIGHT BEARING; FEMUR; HARDNESS; KNEE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; TIBIA; WALKING; YOUNG MODULUS;

ADULT; CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; ELASTIC MODULUS; FEMALE; FEMUR; GAIT; HARDNESS; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TIBIA; WALKING; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 77952514478     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: 18732380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.028     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ateshian G.A., Soslowsky L.J., Mow V.C. Quantitation of articular surface topography and cartilage thickness in knee joints using stereophotogrammetry. J. Biomech. 1991, 24(8):761-776.
2. Bingham J.T., et al. In vivo cartilage contact deformation in the healthy human tibiofemoral joint. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008, 47(11):1622-1627.
3. Cohen Z.A., et al. Knee cartilage topography, thickness, and contact areas from MRI: in-vitro calibration and in-vivo measurements. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1999, 7(1):95-109.
4. Dennis D.A., et al. In vivo determination of normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee kinematics. J. Biomech. 2005, 38(2):241-253.
5. Dyrby C.O., Andriacchi T.P. Secondary motions of the knee during weight bearing and non-weight bearing activities. J. Orthop. Res. 2004, 22(4):794-800.
6. Eckstein F., et al. Interindividual variability and correlation among morphological parameters of knee joint cartilage plates: analysis with three-dimensional MR imaging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001, 9(2):101-111.
7. Eckstein F., et al. In vivo cartilage deformation after different types of activity and its dependence on physical training status. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2005, 64(2):291-295.
8. Freeman M.A., Pinskerova V. The movement of the knee studied by magnetic resonance imaging. Clin. Orthop. 2003, 410:35-43.
9. Hudelmaier M., et al. Age-related changes in the morphology and deformational behavior of knee joint cartilage. Arthritis Rheum. 2001, 44(11):2556-2561.
10. Jones G., et al. Sex and site differences in cartilage development: a possible explanation for variations in knee osteoarthritis in later life. Arthritis Rheum. 2000, 43(11):2543-2549.
11. Koo S., Andriacchi T.P. The knee joint center of rotation is predominantly on the lateral side during normal walking. J. Biomech. 2008, 41(6):1269-1273.
12. Kozanek M., et al. Tibiofemoral kinematics and condylar motion during the stance phase of gait. J. Biomech. 2009, 42(12):1877-1884.
13. Lafortune M.A., et al. Three-dimensional kinematics of the human knee during walking. J. Biomech. 1992, 25(4):347-357.
14. Li G., et al. In vivo articular cartilage contact kinematics of the knee: an investigation using dual-orthogonal fluoroscopy and magnetic resonance image-based computer models. Am. J. Sports Med. 2005, 33(1):102-107.
15. Li G., et al. The cartilage thickness distribution in the tibiofemoral joint and its correlation with cartilage-to-cartilage contact. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon) 2005, 20(7):736-744.
16. Li G., Van de Velde S.K., Bingham J.T. Validation of a non-invasive fluoroscopic imaging technique for the measurement of dynamic knee joint motion. J. Biomech. 2008, 41(7):1616-1622.
17. Logan M., et al. Tibiofemoral kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient weightbearing, living knee employing vertical access open "interventional" multiple resonance imaging. Am. J. Sports Med. 2004, 32(3):720-726.
18. Mann R.A., Hagy J. Biomechanics of walking, running, and sprinting. Am. J. Sports Med. 1980, 8(5):345-350.
19. Patel R.R., et al. Comparison of clinical and dynamic knee function in patients with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Am. J. Sports Med. 2003, 31(1):68-74.
20. Scarvell J.M., et al. Comparison of kinematic analysis by mapping tibiofemoral contact with movement of the femoral condylar centres in healthy and anterior cruciate ligament injured knees. J. Orthop. Res. 2004, 22(5):955-962.
21. Shefelbine S.J., et al. MRI analysis of in vivo meniscal and tibiofemoral kinematics in ACL-deficient and normal knees. J. Orthop. Res. 2006, 24(6):1208-1217.
22. Vande Berg B.C., Lecouvet F.E., Malghem J. Frequency and topography of lesions of the femoro-tibial cartilage at spiral CT arthrography of the knee: a study in patients with normal knee radiographs and without history of trauma. Skeletal Radiol. 2002, 31(11):643-649.
23. Van de Velde S.K., et al. Analysis of tibiofemoral cartilage deformation in the posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2009, 91(1):167-175.
24. Wretenberg P., Ramsey D.K., Nemeth G. Tibiofemoral contact points relative to flexion angle measured with MRI. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon) 2002, 17(6):477-485.