Hierarchical Structure and Search in Complex Organizations

Management Science

Volumn 56, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 831-848

  Mihm, Jürgen ^a   Loch, Christoph H ^a   Wilkinson, Dennis ^b   Huberman, Bernardo A ^b  

^a INSEAD   (France)

^b HEWLETT PACKARD LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Complexity; Coordination; Decentralized problem solving; Hierarchy; Oscillations; Search

Indexed keywords

COMPLEXITY; DECISION MAKERS; FORMAL MODEL; HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURES; LOCAL SOLUTION; MIDDLE MANAGEMENT; NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; NEW STRATEGY; SEARCH SPEED; SOLUTION QUALITY; SOLUTION STABILITY; SPEED-UPS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COORDINATION REACTIONS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 77952510501     PISSN: 00251909     EISSN: 15265501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1100.1148     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Allen, T. J. 1977. Managing the Flow ofT echnology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. Bolton, P., M. Dewatripont. 1994. The firm as a communication network. Quart. J. Econom. 109(4) 809-839.
3. Bruderer, E., J. V. Singh. 1996. Organizational evolution, learning and selection: A genetic-algorithm-based Model. Acad. Management J. 39(5) 1322-1349.
4. Carroll, G. R., J. R. Harrison. 1994. On the historical efficiency of competition between organizational populations. Amer. J. Sociol. 100(3) 720-749.
5. Child, J. 1972. Organization structure, environment, and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology 6(1) 1-22.
6. Child, J. 1984. Organization: A Guide to Problems and Practice, 2nd ed. Harper and Row, New York.
7. Cyert, R. M., J. G. March. 1963. A Behavioral Theory ofthe Firm. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
8. Doty, D. H., W. H. Glick, G. P. Huber. 1993. Fit, equifinality, and organizational effectiveness: A test of two configurational theories. Acad. Management J. 36(6) 1196-1250.
9. Eisenhardt, K. M. 1988. Agency- and institutional-theory explanations: The case of retail sales compensation. Acad. Management J. 31(3) 488-511.
10. Eisenhardt, K. M., B. N. Tabrizi. 1995. Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1) 84-110.
11. Ethiraj, S. K., D. Levinthal. 2004. Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Management Sci. 50(2) 159-173.
12. Ewens, W. 1979. Mathematical Population Genetics. Springer, New York.
13. Fleming, L., O. Sorenson. 2001. Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Res. Policy 30(7) 1019-1039.
14. Gavetti, G. 2005. Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities' development. Organ. Sci. 16(6) 599-617.
15. Gavetti, G., D. Levinthal. 2000. Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1) 113-137.
16. Gresov, C., R. Drazin. 1997. Equifinality: Functional equivalence in organization design. Acad. Management Rev. 22(2) 403-428.
17. Hamilton, D. P. 2001. Silicon Valley: Intel fights for a future in server chips. Wall Street Journal (Europe edition) (May 29) 1, 9.
18. Hannan, M. T., L. Pólos, G. R. Carroll. 2003a. Cascading organizational change. Organ. Sci. 14(5) 463-482.
19. Hannan, M. T., L. Pólos, G. R. Carroll. 2003b. The fog of change: Opacity and asperity in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(3) 399-432.
20. Hogg, T., B. A. Huberman, J. M. McGlade. 1989. The stability of ecosystems. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., Ser. B 237(1286) 43-51.
21. Huberman, B. A., N. S. Glance. 1993. Evolutionary games and computer simulations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90(16) 7716-7718.
22. Huberman, B. A., D. Wilkinson. 2005. Performance variability and project dynamics. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 11(4) 307-332.
23. Janis, I. L. 1971. Victims ofGr oupthink. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
24. Kauffman, S. A. 1993. The Origins ofOrder: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York.
25. Keren, M., D. Levhari. 1983. The internal organization of the firm and the shape of average costs. Bell J. Econom. 14(2) 474-486.
26. Knudsen, T., D. A. Levinthal. 2007. Two faces of search: Alternative generation and alternative evaluation Organ. Sci. 18(1) 39-54.
27. Levinthal, D. A. 1997. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7) 934-950.
28. Lewontin, R. C. 1974. The Genetic Basis ofEvolutionar y Change. Columbia University Press, New York.
29. Loch, C. H., C. Terwiesch. 2007. Coordination and information exchange. C. Loch, S. Kavadias, eds. Handbook ofNew Product Development Management. Butterworth Heinemann, Amsterdam, 315-343.
30. Lounamaa, P. H., J. G. March. 1987. Adaptive coordination of a learning team. Management Sci. 33(1) 107-123.
31. March, J., H. Simon. 1958. Organizations. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.
32. Mihm, J., C. H. Loch, A. Huchzermeier. 2003. Problem-solving oscillations in complex engineering projects. Management Sci. 49(6) 733-750.
33. Moldoveanu, M. C., R. M. Bauer. 2004. On the relationship between organizational complexity and organizational structuration. Organization Sci. 15(1) 98-118.
34. Nadler, D. A., M. L. Tushman. 1997. Competing by Design: The Power ofOr ganizational Architecture. Oxford University Press. New York.
35. Nelson, R., S. Winter. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory ofEconomic Change. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
36. Radner, R. 1993. The organization of decentralized information processing. Econometrica 61(5) 1109-1146.
37. Rivkin, J. W. 2000. Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. 46(6) 824-844.
38. Rivkin, J. W., N. Siggelkow. 2003. Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. 49(3) 290-311.
39. Siggelkow, N., J. W. Rivkin. 2005. Speed and search: Designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organ. Sci. 16(2) 101-122.
40. Simon, H. A. 1969. The Sciences ofthe Artificial, 2nd ed. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
41. Sorenson. O. 2002. Interorganizational complexity and computation. J. A. C. Baum, ed. The Blackwell Companion to Organizations. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK.
42. Sosa, M. E., S. D. Eppinger, C. M. Rowles. 2004. The misalignment of product architecture and organizational structure in complex product development. Management Sci. 50(12) 1674-1689.
43. Terwiesch, C., C. H. Loch. 1999. Managing the process of engineering change orders. J. Product Innovation Management 16(2) 160-172.
44. Terwiesch, C., C. H. Loch, A. De Meyer. 2002. Exchanging preliminary information in concurrent engineering: Alternative coordination strategies. Organ. Sci. 13(4) 402-419.
45. Thomke, S. H. 1997. The role of flexibility in the development of new products: An experimental study. Res. Policy 26(1) 105-119.
46. Thomke, S. H., M. Holzner, T. Golami. 1999. The crash in the machine. Sci. Amer. 280(3) 92-97.
47. van de Ven, A. H., R. Drazin. 1985. The concept of fit in contingency theory. Res. Organ. Behav. 7 333-365.
48. Van Zandt, T. 1999. Decentralized information processing in the theory of organizations. M. Sertel ed. Contemporary Economic Issues, Economic Behavior and Design, Vol.4. Macmilan, London, 125-160.
49. Williamson, O. E. 1991. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(2) 269-296.
50. Winter, S. G., G. Cattani, A. Dorsch. 2007. The value of moderate obsession: Insights from a new model of organizational search. Organ. Sci. 18(3) 403-419.
51. Yassine, A., N. Joglekar, D. Braha, S. Eppinger, D. Whitney. 2003. Information hiding in product development: The design churn effect. Res. Engrg. Design 14(3) 145-161.