Primary hemiarthroplasty versus conservative treatment for comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly (ProCon): A Multicenter Randomized Controlled trial

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 11, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Den Hartog, Dennis ^a   Tuinebreijer, Wim E ^a   Polinder, Suzanne ^a   Van Beeck, Ed F ^a   Breederveld, Roelf S ^b   Bronkhorst, Maarten W G A ^c   Eerenberg, Jan Peter ^d   Rhemrev, Steven ^c   Roerdink, W Herbert ^e   Schraa, Gerrit ^f   Van Der Vis, Harm M ^d   Van Thiel, Thom P H ^g   Patka, Peter ^a   Nijs, Stefaan ^h   Schep, Niels W L ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b RED CROSS HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^c MEDICAL CENTER HAAGLANDEN   (Netherlands)

^d Tergooi Hospitals   (Netherlands)

^e DEVENTER HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^f ST JANSDAL HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^g St Jansdal Hospital ^*  (Netherlands)

^h UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BELGIUM; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMMINUTED FRACTURE; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE HEALING; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; HUMERUS FRACTURE; HUMERUS HEAD; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NETHERLANDS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; AGE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; HUMERUS; IMPLANTATION; INJURY; METHODOLOGY; OSTEOPOROSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS; SHOULDER; SHOULDER FRACTURE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGE FACTORS; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY; BELGIUM; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; FEMALE; FRACTURES, COMMINUTED; HUMANS; HUMERUS; MALE; NETHERLANDS; OSTEOPOROSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; SHOULDER FRACTURES; SHOULDER JOINT;

EID: 77952504089     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-97     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of treatment modalities. B Lanting J MacDermid D Drosdowech KJ Faber, J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008 17 42 54 10.1016/j.jse.2007.03.016 18308203
2. Four part fractures of the proximal humerus. M Bhandari G Matthys MD McKee, J Orthop Trauma 2004 18 126 127 10.1097/00005131-200402000-00015 14743037
3. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. HH Handoll JN Gibson R Madhok, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003 D000434 14583921
4. Treatment of proximal humerus fractures. HA Vallier, J Orthop Trauma 2007 21 469 476 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318133479c 17762478
5. Proximal humeral fractures: how stiff should an implant be? A comparative mechanical study with new implants in human specimens. H Lill P Hepp J Korner JP Kassi AP Verheyden C Josten GN Duda, Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2003 123 74 81 12721684
6. Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus. R Hertel A Hempfing M Stiehler M Leunig, J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2004 13 427 433 10.1016/j.jse.2004.01.034 15220884
7. Functional outcome after humeral head replacement for acute three-and four-part proximal humeral fractures. RT Goldman KJ Koval F Cuomo MA Gallagher JD Zuckerman, J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1995 4 81 86 10.1016/S1058-2746(05)80059-X 7600169
8. Medium-term results after primary hemiarthroplasty for comminute proximal humerus fractures: a study of 46 patients followed up for an average of 4.4 years. CM Gronhagen H Abbaszadegan SA Revay PY Adolphson, J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007 16 766 773 10.1016/j.jse.2007.03.017 17967549
9. Non-operative treatment versus tension-band osteosynthesis in three-and four-part proximal humeral fractures. A retrospective study of 34 fractures from two different trauma centers. T Ilchmann PE Ochsner H Wingstrand K Jonsson, Int Orthop 1998 22 316 320 10.1007/s002640050268 9914936
10. Outcome after primary hemiarthroplasty for fracture of the head of the humerus. A retrospective multicentre study of 167 patients. F Kralinger R Schwaiger M Wambacher E Farrell W Menth-Chiari G Lajtai C Hubner H Resch, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004 86 217 219 10.1302/0301-620X.86B2.14553 15046436
11. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. CS Neer, J Bone Joint Surg Am 1970 52 1077 1089 5455339
12. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. CS Neer, J Bone Joint Surg Am 1970 52 1090 1103 5455340
13. Four-part fractures of the neck of the humerus. PG Stableforth, J Bone Joint Surg Br 1984 66 104 108 6693466
14. Non-operative treatment of comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients. K Zyto, Injury 1998 29 349 352 10.1016/S0020-1383(97)00211- 8 9813677
15. Treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. K Zyto L Ahrengart A Sperber H Tornkvist, J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997 79 412 417 10.1302/0301-620X.79B3.7419 9180319
16. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. http://www.wma.net/en/ 30publications/10policies/b3/index.html
17. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. I Boutron D Moher DG Altman KF Schulz P Ravaud, Ann Intern Med 2008 148 295 309 18283207 (Pubitemid 351665487)
18. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials. D Moher KF Schulz DG Altman, BMC Med Res Methodol 2001 1 2 10.1186/1471-2288-1-2 11336663
19. Natural history of complex fractures of the proximal humerus using a three-dimensional classification system. G Edelson H Safuri J Salami F Vigder D Militianu, J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008 17 399 409 10.1016/j.jse.2007.08.014 18282724
20. Six-item screener to identify cognitive impairment among potential subjects for clinical research. CM Callahan FW Unverzagt SL Hui AJ Perkins HC Hendrie, Med Care 2002 40 771 781 10.1097/00005650-200209000-00007 12218768
21. Functional outcome of shoulder hemiarthroplasty for fractures: A multicentre analysis. F Reuther B Muhlhausler D Wahl S Nijs, Injury 20116058
22. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. CR Constant AH Murley, Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987 160 164 3791738
23. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. DE Beaton JN Katz AH Fossel JG Wright V Tarasuk C Bombardier, J Hand Ther 2001 14 128 146 11382253
24. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). PL Hudak PC Amadio C Bombardier, Am J Ind Med 1996 29 602 608 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602:AID-AJIM43.0.CO;2-L 8773720
25. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons subjective shoulder scale in patients with shoulder instability, rotator cuff disease, and glenohumeral arthritis. MS Kocher MP Horan KK Briggs TR Richardson J O'Holleran RJ Hawkins, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005 87 2006 2011 10.2106/JBJS.C.01624 16140816
26. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. JE Ware Jr CD Sherbourne, Med Care 1992 30 473 483 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 1593914
27. The measurement and valuation of health status using EQ-5D: a European perspective. R Brooks REDC Rabin Eds, Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003
28. Measuring the quality of life in economic evaluations: the Dutch EQ-5D tariff. LM Lamers PF Stalmeier J McDonnell PF Krabbe JJ van Busschbach, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2005 149 1574 1578 16038162
29. Quality of life after multiple trauma-summary and recommendations of the consensus conference. E Neugebauer B Bouillon M Bullinger S Wood-Dauphinee, Restor Neurol Neurosci 2002 20 161 167 12454364 (Pubitemid 35404349)
30. Guidelines for the conduction of follow-up studies measuring injury-related disability. EF Van Beeck CF Larsen RA Lyons WJ Meerding S Mulder ML Essink-Bot, J Trauma 2007 62 534 550 10.1097/TA.0b013e31802e70c7 17297349
31. EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of healthrelated quality of life. The EuroQol Group, Health Policy 1990 16 199 208 10.1016/0168-8510(90) 90421-9 10109801
32. Handleiding voor kostenonderzoek. Methoden en standaard kostprijzen voor economische evaluaties in de gezondheidszorg. JB Oostenbrink CAM Bouwmans MA Koopmanschap FFH Rutten, College voor Zorgverzekeringen, Diemen 2004
33. College voor Zorgverzekeringen, Richtlijnen farmaco-economisch onderzoek, geactualiseerde versie. 2006
34. Investing in health for economic development. Report of the Commission on Macroeconomics and Health. Macroeconomics and health, Geneva: WHO Commision on Macroeocnomics and Health 2001
35. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE): Is economic appraisal working? A Towse C Pritchard, Pharmacoeconomics 2002 20 Suppl 3 95 105 10.2165/00019053-200220003-00010 12457430
36. Mortality after low-energy fractures in patients aged at least 45 years old. NL Shortt CM Robinson, J Orthop Trauma 2005 19 396 400 10.1097/01.bot. 0000155311.04886.7e 16003199
37. Primary Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Conservative Treatment for Comminuted Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Systematic Literature Review. D Den Hartog J De Haan NWL Schep WE Tuinebreijer, Open Orthop J 2010 4 87 92 10.2174/1874325001004020087 20309406