Exploratory survey at the Mexican marketplace on pork muscles characteristics from U.S.A. and Mexico;Encuesta exploratoria en el mercado Mexicano sobre las características de músculos de cerdos originarios de Estados Unidos y México

Revista Cientifica de la Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias de la Universidad del Zulia

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 506-512

  Méndez Medina, Rubén Danilo ^a   Ponce Alquicira, Edith ^b   Lozano, María Salud Rubio ^a   Ryan, Suzanne ^c   Huerta Leidenz, Nelson ^d  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^b DEPARTAMENTO DE QUÍMICA   (Mexico)

^c KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d US Meat Export Federation   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Longissimus dorsi; Mexico; Pork quality; Rectus femoris; USA; Vastus medialis

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952502701     PISSN: 07982259     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ASSOCIATION OF OFFICIAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTS. OFFICIAL METHODS OF ANALYSIS (AOAC). Washington DC. USA. 39.1-39.9 pp. 1995.
2. AMERICAN MEAT SCIENCE ASSOCIATION & NATIONAL LIVESTOCK AND MEAT BOARD. (AMSA). Research guidelines for cookery, sensory evaluation and instrumental tenderness measurements of fresh meat. Chicago. IL.145-170 pp. 1995.
3. ARCOS-GARCIA, G.; TOTOSAUS, A.; GUERRERO, I.; PEREZ-CHABELA, M.L. Physicochemical, sensory, functional and microbial characterization of horse meat. Rev. Bras. de Agrocien 8: 43-46. 2002.
4. ARSLAN, S. Effects of salt and phosphates level on emulsion properties of fresh and frozen hen meats. Afric. J. of Biotechnol. 5: 1006-1012. 2006.
5. BENDALL, J. R.; SWATLAND, H. J. A review of the relationships of pH with physical aspects of pork quality. Meat Sci 24: 85-126. 1988.
6. BOUTON, P. E.; HARRIS, P. V.; SHORTHOSE, W. R. The effect of pH upon the water-holding capacity and tenderness of mutton. J. of Food Sci. 36: 435-439. 1971.
7. BRISKEY, E. J. Etiological status and associated studies of pale, soft, exudative porcine musculature. Adv Food Res. 13: 89-178. 1964.
8. GALLARDO N., J. L.; VILLAMAR A., L.; BARREAR W., M. A. Situación actual y perspectiva de la producción de carne de porcino en México. 2006. Coordinación General de Ganadería. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación. En línea: http://www.sagarpa.gob.mx/Dgg/estudio/sitpor06d.pdf. 22 febrero. 2008.
9. HAMM, R. Water holding capacity of meat. In: Meat D.J.A. Cole and R.A. Lawrie, (Eds) Butterworths, London. 321-337 pp. 1975.
10. HONIKEL, K. The use and control of nitrate and nitrite for the processing of meat products. Meat Sci. 78:68-76. 2007.
11. HUFF-LONERGAN, E.; LONERGAN, S. M. Mechanisms of water holding capacity of meat: The role of postmortem biochemical and structural changes. Meat Sci. 71: 194-204. 2005.
12. KROPF, D. H.; HUNT, M. C.; PISKE, D. Color formation and retention in fresh meat. In Proceedings Meat Indust. Res Conference American Meat Institute Washington, DC. Pp. 62. 1986.
13. LENTNER, M.; BISHOP, T. Experimental Design and Analysis. Valley Book Company, Blacksburg, VA. 63-65 pp.1986.
14. LITTLE, A. C. A research note of on a Tangent. J of Food Sci 40: 410-411. 1975.
15. MACKEY, A. O.; OLIVER, A. W.; FANG, S. C. Chemical constituents, physical properties of palatability of frozen pork. Food Res. 17: 409-418. 1952.
16. MENDEZ M., D. R.; BECERRIL H., M.; RUBIO L., M. S.; DELGADO S., E. J. Carcass traits of Hairless Mexican pigs of Mizantla in the state of Veracruz in Mexico. Vet. Mex. 33: 27-37. 2001.
17. th International Congress Meat Science and Technology. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 27 August-1 September 2000. Pp. 566-579. 2000.
18. NAUMANN, H. D.; RHODES, V. J.; BRADY, D. E.; KIEHL, E. R. Discrimination techniques in meat acceptance studies. J. of Food Technol. 2: 123-132. 1957.
19. OWEN, J. E.; NUÑEZ, F. A.; ARIAS, M. T.; DE, C. A., RÍOS, O. Calidad de carne. Manual de prácticas del curso de tecnología de la carne. Facultad de Zootecnia. Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, México. 17-25 pp 1982.
20. OCKERMAN, H. W. Quality Control of Postmortem Muscle Tissue. 2nd Ed, Vol. 2, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. Pp 51- 70.1985.
21. PENNY, I. F.; VOYLE, C. A.; LAWRIE, R. A. The comparison of freeze-dried beef muscle of high and low ultimate pH. J. of the Sci. of Food and Agri. 14: 53. 1963.
22. PEDRERO, D.L.; PANGBORN, R.M. Métodos Analíticos. Evaluación sensorial de los alimentos. México City. Editorial Alhambra Mexicana. Pp. 300. 1996.
23. NORTH AMERICAN MEAT PROCESSORS ASSOCIATION. (NAMP). The Meat Buyeŕs Guide. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Hoboken, New Jersey. Pp 140-155. 2007.
24. SECRETARÍA DE AGRICULTURA, GANADERÍA, DESARROLLO RURAL, PESCA Y ALIMENTACIÓN. Coordinación General de Ganadería Informe sobre la situación de los recursos genéticos pecuarios de México. 2003. En línea: http://www.sagarpa.gob.mx/ganaderia/FTP/infofao.pdf. October 2008.
25. SPSS for Windows Ver. 16.0. Professional Statistics SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL. 1997.
26. SWIFT, C. E.; LOCKETT, C.; FRYAR, A. J. Comminuted meat emulsion-the capacity of meats for emulsifying fats. Food Technol. 15: 468-473. 1961.
27. SWATLAND, H. J. Evaluation of pH-related aspects of pork quality by capacitance measurements in an abattoir. Can J. of Anim Sci. 62: 725-730. 1982a.
28. SWATLAND, H. J. Meat color of pork chops in relation to pH and adductor capacitance of intact carcasses. J. of Anim Sci. 54: 264-267. 1982b.
29. INTERNATIONAL MARKETS, STRATEGIC MARKET (USMEF). Profile Report (SMP), 2007. On line: http://www.usmef.org/TradeLibrary/files/07_06_Pork.pdf. October, 2008.