Simulation of matched field processing localization based on empirical mode decomposition and karhunen-love expansion in underwater waveguide environment

Eurasip Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Volumn 2010, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Wang, Qiang ^a   Jiang, Qin ^a  

^a CHINA JILIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC PROPAGATION; ACOUSTIC WAVEGUIDES; DE-NOISING; EMPIRICAL MODE DECOMPOSITION; ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETER; KARHUNEN-LOVE EXPANSION; MATCHED FIELD PROCESSING; MISMATCH PROBLEMS; NUMERICAL SIMULATION; SAMPLE COVARIANCE MATRIX; SIGNAL COMPONENTS; UNDERWATER ACOUSTIC SIGNAL; UNDERWATER SOURCE DETECTION; UNDERWATER TARGET; UNDERWATER WAVEGUIDE;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COVARIANCE MATRIX; WAVEGUIDES;

UNDERWATER ACOUSTICS;

EID: 77952493073     PISSN: 16876172     EISSN: 16876180     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/2010/483524     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Tolstoy A., Ardshir G., Grard M., Juri E., Michael W., Matched field processing: a powerful tool for the study of oceans and scatterers Acoustic Interactions With Submerged Elastic Structures 2001 5 Singapore World Science 84 111
2. Baggeroer A. B., Kuperman W. A., Mikhalevsky P. N., Overview of matched field methods in ocean acoustics IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 1993 18 4 401 424
3. Smith G. B., Chandler H. A., Feuillade C., Morris D. J., Sector focusing for robust high resolution analysis of the matched field processing workshop data set Journal of Computational Acoustics 1994 2 3 199 215
4. Shorey J. A., Nolte L. W., Wideband optimal a posteriori probability source localization in an uncertain shallow ocean environment Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1998 103 1 355 361
5. Shin K. C., Kim J. S., Matched field processing with contrast maximization Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2005 118 3 1526 1533
6. Seong W., Byun S.-H., Robust matched field-processing algorithm based on feature extraction IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 2002 27 3 642 652
7. Kim K. S., Seong W., Lee C., Matched field processing: analysis of feature extraction method with ocean experimental data Proceedings of the International Symposium on Underwater Technology (UT '04) 2004 Taipei, Taiwan 181 185
8. Debever C., Kuperman W. A., Robust matched-field processing using a coherent broadband white noise constraint processor Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2007 122 4 1979 1986
9. Ding F., Gong X. Y., Multiresolution processing for source detection and localization Acta Acustica 2003 28 1 40 44
10. Gong G., Gong X., Robust matched field processor based on wavelet denoising and feature extraction Chinese Journal of Electronics 2007 16 4 683 687
11. Huang N. E., Shen Z., Long S. R., The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for non-linear and non-stationary time series analysis Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 1998 454 1971 903 995
12. Flandrin P., Rilling G., Goncalves P., Empirical mode decomposition as a filter bank IEEE Signal Processing Letters 2004 11 2 112 114
13. Boudraa A.-O., Cexus J.-C., EMD-based signal filtering IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 2007 56 6 2196 2202
14. Jensen F. B., Kuperman W. A., Porter M. B., Schmidt H., Computational Ocean Acoustics 1994 Woodbury, NY, USA AIP Press
15. Donoho D. L., Johnstone I. M., Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage Biometrika 1994 81 3 425 455
16. Porter M. B., The KRAKEN normal mode program 1991 SM-245 La Spezia, Italy SACLANT Undersea Research Centre
17. Porter M. B., Tolstoy A., The matched field processing benchmark problems Journal of Computational Acoustics 1994 2 3 161 185