Reproductive interactions mediated by flowering overlap in a temperate hummingbird-plant assemblage

Oikos

Volumn 119, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 696-706

  Aizen, Marcelo A ^a   Rovere, Adriana E ^a  

^a Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto M Lillo   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIRD; BREEDING SEASON; CONSPECIFIC; FLOWER VISITING; FLOWERING; FRUIT SET; META-ANALYSIS; PHENOLOGY; PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTION; POLLEN LIMITATION; RECRUITMENT (POPULATION DYNAMICS); SEED PRODUCTION; TEMPERATE FOREST;

SOUTH AMERICA;

EID: 77952486231     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17762.x     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Aguilar R. Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta-analysis. Ecol. Lett. 2006, 9:968-980.
2. Aizen M A. Influences of animal pollination and seed dispersal on winter flowering in a temperate mistletoe. Ecology 2003, 84:2613-2627.
3. Aizen M A, Ezcurra C. High incidence of plant-animal mutualisms in the woody flora of the temperate forest of southern South America: biogeographical origin and present ecological significance. Ecol. Austral 1998, 8:217-236.
4. Aizen M A, Vázquez D P. Flowering phenologies of hummingbird plants from the temperate forest of southern South America: is there evidence of competitive displacement? Ecography 2006, 29:357-366.
5. Aizen M A, Harder L D. Expanding the limits of the pollen-limitation concept: effects of pollen quantity and quality. Ecology 2007, 88:271-281.
6. Aizen M A. Historia natural de los mutualismos planta-animal del Bosque Templado de Sudamérica Austral. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat. 2002, 75:79-97.
7. Alexander M P. A versatile stain for pollen, fungi, yeast, and bacteria. Stain Technol. 1980, 55:13-18.
8. Armbruster W S. Reproductive interactions between sympatric Dalechampia species: are natural assemblages " random" or organized? Ecology 1986, 67:522-533.
9. Armbruster W S. Floral character displacement generates assemblage structure of western Australian triggerplants (Stylidium). Ecology 1994, 75:315-329.
10. Ashman T L. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology 2004, 85:2408-2421.
11. Ashton P S. Staggering flowering in the Dipterocarpaceae: new insights into floral induction and the evolution of mast fruiting in the aseasonal tropics. Am. Nat. 1988, 117:993-997.
12. Barros V. Cartas de precipitación de la zona oeste de las provincias de Río Negro y Neuquén 1983, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Univ. Nacional del Comahue
13. Bastolla U. The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity. Nature 2009, 458:1018-1020.
14. Bell J M. Interspecific competition for pollination lowers seed production and outcrossing in Mimulus ringens. Ecology 2005, 86:762-771.
15. Borchsenius F. Staggered flowering in four sympatric varieties of Geonoma cuneata (Palmae). Biotropica 2002, 34:603-606.
16. Bronstein J L. Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interactions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1994, 9:214-217.
17. Cabrera A L. Fitogeografía de la República Argentina. Bol. Soc. Argentina Bot. 1971, 14:1-42.
18. Caruso C M. Pollination of Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae): effects of intra- vs interspecific competition. Am. J. Bot. 1999, 86:663-668.
19. Caruso C M, Alfaro M. Interspecific pollen transfer as a mechanism of competition: effect of Castilleja linariaefolia pollen on seed set of Ipomopsis aggregata. Can. J. Bot. 2000, 78:600-606.
20. Eckert C G. Contributions of autogamy and geitonogamy to self-fertilization in a mass-flowering, clonal plant. Ecology 2000, 81:532-542.
21. Eckhart V M. Spatio-temporal variation in abundance and variation in foraging behavior of the pollinators of gynodioecious Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Oikos 1992, 64:573-586.
22. Feinsinger P. Effects of plant species on each other's pollination: is community structure influenced? Trends Ecol. Evol. 1987, 2:123-126.
23. Feinsinger P, Tiebout H M. Competition among plants sharing hummingbird pollinators: laboratory experiments on a mechanism. Ecology 1991, 72:1946-1952.
24. Feinsinger P. Do tropical bird-pollinated plants exhibit density-dependent interactions? Field experiments. Ecology 1991, 72:1953-1963.
25. Flanagan R J. Interspecific pollinator movements reduce pollen deposition and seed production in Mimulus ringens (Phrymaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2009, 96:809-815.
26. Fraga R M. Interacciones entre el picaflor rubíSephanoides sephaniodes y plantas del bosque Subantártico en el Parque Nacional Nahuel Huapi. Hornero 1997, 13:224-234.
27. Ghazoul J. Floral diversity and the facilitation of pollination. J. Ecol. 2006, 94:295-304.
28. Gurevitch J. Meta-analysis in ecology. Adv. Ecol. Res. 2001, 32:199-247.
29. Harder L D, Johnson SD. Function and evolution of aggregated pollen in angiosperms. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2008, 169:59-78.
30. Harder L D, Aizen M A. Floral adaptation and diversification under pollen limitation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 2009, in press
31. Herrera C M. Variation in mutualisms: the spatio-temporal mosaic of a pollinator assemblage. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1988, 35:95-125.
32. Horvitz C C, Schemske D W. Spatiotemporal variation in insect mutualists of a Neotropical herb. Ecology 1990, 71:1085-1097.
33. Hsiao T C. Growth and productivity of crops in relation to water status. Acta Hort. 1993, 335:137-148.
34. Kitzberger T. Climatic influences on fire regimes along a rain forest-to-xeric woodland gradient in northern Patagonia, Argentina. J. Biogeogr. 1997, 24:35-47.
35. Laverty T M. Plant interactions for pollinator visits: a test of the magnet species effect. Oecologia 1992, 89:502-508.
36. Manly B F J. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology 1997, Chapman and Hall
37. Markgraf V. Neogene paleoenvironmental and paleoclimatic change in southern temperate ecosystems: a southern perspective. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1995, 10:143-147.
38. McCabe G J. Pacific and Atlantic Ocean influences on multidecadal drought frequency in the United States. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101:4136-4141.
39. Mitchell R J. New frontiers in competition for pollination. Ann. Bot. 2009, 103:1403-1413.
40. Moeller D A. Facilitative interactions among plants via shared pollinators. Ecology 2004, 85:3289-3301.
41. Morales C L, Traveset A. Interspecific pollen transfer: magnitude, prevalence and consequences for plant fitness. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2008, 27:221-238.
42. Muchhala N, Potts M D. Character displacement among bat-pollinated flowers of the genus Burmeistera: analysis of mechanism, process and pattern. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2007, 274:2731-2737.
43. Murcia C, Feinsinger E. Interspecific pollen loss by hummingbirds visiting flower mixtures: effects of floral architecture. Ecology 1996, 77:550-560.
44. Murphy S D, Aarsen L W. Reduced seed set in Elytrigia repens caused by allelopathic pollen from Phleum pratense. Can. J. Bot. 1995, 73:1417-1422.
45. Peter C I, Johnson S D. Mimics and magnets: the importance of color and ecological facilitation in floral deception. Ecology 2008, 89:1583-1595.
46. Pleasants J M. Null model tests for competitive displacement: the fallacy of not focusing on the whole community. Ecology 1990, 71:1078-1084.
47. Premoli A C. Isozyme variation and recent biogeo-graphical history of the long-lived conifer Fitzroya cupressoides. J. Biogeogr. 2000, 27:251-260.
48. Rasmussen P W. Time series intervention analysis: unreplicated large-scale experiments. Design and analysis of ecological experiments 1993, 138-158. Scheiner S MGurevitch J. In:, (eds),, CRC Press, pp.
49. Rathcke B. Competition and facilitation among plants for pollination: Pollination biology 1983, 305-329. Real L. In:, (ed.),, Academic Press, pp.
50. Rathcke B J. Interactions for pollination among coflowe-ring shrubs. Ecology 1988, 69:446-457.
51. Riveros M. Aspectos sobre la biología reproductiva en dos comunidades del sur de Chile, 40°S. PhD thesis 1991, Univ. de Chile
52. Riveros M. Sistemas de reproducción en especies del bosque valdiviano (40° latitud sur). Phyton 1996, 58:167-176.
53. Rovere A. Breeding system of Embothrium coccineum J.R. et G. Forster. (Proteaceae) in two populations on different slopes of the Andes. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat. 2006, 79:225-232.
54. Ruffini A E. Interacciones entre Sephanoides sephaniodes (Molina) y las plantas que poliniza en el bosque de Nothofagus. Lic. Thesis 1992, Univ. Nacional del Comahue
55. Sargent R D, Ackerly D D. Plant-pollinator interactions and the assembly of plant communities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2008, 23:123-130.
56. Simon J L. Resampling stats. IBM Ver 1992, 3.13
57. Smith-Ramírez C. Los picaflores y su recurso floral en el bosque templado de la isla de Chiloé, Chile. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat. 1993, 66:65-73.
58. Stephenson AG. Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1981, 12:253-279.
59. Suárez M L, Kitzberger T. Recruitment patterns following a severe drought: long-term compositional shifts in Patagonian forests. Can. J. For. Res. 2008, 38:3002-3010.
60. Suárez M L. Factors predisposing episodic drought-induced tree mortality in Nothofagus- site, climatic sensitivity and growth trends. J. Ecol. 2004, 92:954-966.
61. Sukhada D K, Chandra J. Pollen allelopathy - a new phenomenon. New Phytol. 1980, 84:739-746.
62. Thomson J D. The effect of a foreign pollen on ovule development in Diervilla lonicera (Caprifoliaceae). New Phytol. 1982, 90:777-783.
63. Vázquez D P, Stevens R D. The latitudinal gradient in niche breadth: concepts and evidence. Am. Nat 2004, 164:E1-E19.
64. Waser N M. Competition for hummingbird pollination and sequential flowering in two Colorado wildflowers. Ecology 1978, 59:934-944.
65. Waser N M, Fugate M L. Pollen precedence and stigma closure: a mechanism of competition for pollination between Delphinium nelsonii and Ipomopsis aggregata. Oecologia 1986, 70:573-577.
66. Zar J H. Biostatistics analysis 1999, Prentice-Hall