Should economists use open source software for doing research?

Computational Economics

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 371-394

  Yalta, A Talha ^a   Yalta, A Yasemin ^b  

^a TOBB UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND TECHNOLOGY   (Turkey)

^b HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Econometric software; Gretl; Open source; Software reliability

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952427533     PISSN: 09277099     EISSN: 15729974     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10614-010-9204-4     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Altman M., McDonald M. P. (2001) Choosing reliable scientific software. PS: Political Science and Politics 34: 681-687.
2. Altman M., McDonald M. P. (2003) Replication with attention to numerical accuracy. Political Analysis 11: 302-307.
3. Altman M., Gill J., McDonald M. P. (2004) Numerical issues in statistical computing for the social scientist (1st ed.). Wiley, New Jersey.
4. Anderson R. G., Greene W. H., McCullough B. D., Vinod H. D. (2008) The role of data-code archives in the future of economic research. Journal of Economic Methodology 15: 99-119.
5. Baiocchi G. (2007) Reproducible research in computational economics: Guidelines, integrated approaches, and open source software. Computational Economics 30: 19-40.
6. Baiocchi G., Distaso W. (2003) GRETL: Econometric software for the GNU generation. Journal of Applied Econometrics 18: 105-110.
7. Bankhofer U., Hilbert A. (1997) Statistical software packages for windows-a market survey. Statistical Papers 38: 377-471.
8. Boehm B. W. (1981) Software engineering economics (1st ed.). Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
9. Boehm B. W., Abts C., Brown A. W., Chulani S., Clark B. K., Horowitz E., Madachy R., Reifer D. J., Steece B. (2000) Software cost estimation with Cocomo II (1st ed.). Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
10. Bonaccorsi A., Giannangeli S., Rossi C. (2006) Entry strategies under competing standards: Hybrid business models in the open source software industry. Management Science 52: 1085-1098.
11. Brooks C., Burke S. P., Persand G. (2001) Benchmarks and the accuracy of GARCH model estimation. International Journal of Forecasting 17: 45-56.
12. Brooks C., Burke S. P., Persand G. (2003) Multivariate GARCH models: Software choice and estimation issues. Journal of Applied Econometrics 18: 725-734.
13. Bruno G., Bonis R. D. (2004) A comparative study of alternative econometric packages with an application to Italian deposit interest rates. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement 29: 271-295.
14. Choi H. S., Kiefer N. M. (2005) Software evaluation: EasyReg international. International Journal of Forecasting 21: 609-616.
15. Clary E. G., Ridge R. D., Stukas A. A., Snyder M., Copeland J., Haugen J., Miene P. (1998) Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74: 1516-1530.
16. Cryer J. D., Chan K. S. (2008) Time series analysis: With applications in R (2nd ed.). Springer, New York, NY.
17. Haefliger S., von Krogh G., Spaeth S. (2008) Code reuse in open source software. Management Science 54: 180-195.
18. Heiser, D. A. (2006). Microsoft Excel 2000 and 2003 faults, problems, workarounds and fixes. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 51, 1442-1443. http://www.daheiser.info/excel/frontpage.html.
19. Hertel G., Niedner S., Herrmann S. (2003) Motivation of software developers in open source projects: An internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel. Research Policy 32: 1159-1177.
20. Johnson J. P. (2006) Collaboration, peer review and open source software. Information Economics and Policy 18: 477-497.
21. Keeling K. B., Pavur R. J. (2007) A comparative study of the reliability of nine statistical software packages. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 51: 3811-3831.
22. Kitchen A. M., Drachenberg R., Symanzik J. (2003) Assessing the reliability of web-based statistical software. Computational Statistics 18: 107-122.
23. Kleiber C., Zeileis A. (2008) Applied Econometrics with R (1st ed.). Springer, New York, NY.
24. Knüsel L. (1995) On the accuracy of the statistical distributions in GAUSS. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 20: 699-702.
25. Knüsel L. (1996) Telegrams. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 21: 116.
26. Knüsel L (1998) On the accuracy of statistical distributions in Microsoft Excel 97. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 26: 375-377.
27. Knüsel L. (2002) On the reliability of Microsoft Excel XP for statistical purposes. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 39: 109-110.
28. Knüsel L. (2005) On the accuracy of statistical distributions in Microsoft Excel 2003. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 48: 445-449.
29. Koch, A., & Haag, U. (1995). The statistical software guide '94/95. A. Koch & U. Haag (Eds.). Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 19, 237-261.
30. Lakhani K. R., von Hippel E. (2003) How open source software works: "Free" user-to-user assistance. Research Policy 32: 923-943.
31. Lerner J., Tirole J. (2001) The open source movement: Key research questions. European Economic Review 45: 819-826.
32. Lerner J., Tirole J. (2002) Some simple economics of open source. Journal of Industrial Economics 50: 197-234.
33. Lerner J., Tirole J. (2005a) The economics of technology sharing: Open source and beyond. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19: 99-120.
34. Lerner J., Tirole J. (2005b) The scope of open source licensing. Journal of Law Economics and Organization 21: 20-56.
35. Lerner J., Pathak P. A., Tirole J. (2006) The dynamics of open-source contributors. American Economic Review 96: 114-118.
36. Lovell M. C., Selover D. D. (1994) Econometric software accidents. The Economic Journal 104: 713-725.
37. Lucchetti, R. (2009). Who uses gretl? An analysis of the SourceForge download data. In Econometrics with gretl. Proceedings of the gretl conference 2009, Bilbao, Spain (pp. 45-55).
38. Maurer S. M., Scotchmer S. (2006) Open source software: The new IP paradigm. In: Hendershott T. (eds) Handbook of economics and information systems. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 285-319.
39. McCullough B. D. (1998) Assessing the reliability of statistical software: Part I. American Statistician 52: 358-366.
40. McCullough B. D. (1999a) Assessing the reliability of statistical software: Part II. American Statistician 53: 149-159.
41. McCullough B. D. (1999b) Econometric software reliability: Eviews, LIMDEP, CHASM and TSP. Journal of Applied Econometrics 14: 191-202.
42. McCullough B. D. (2000) Is it safe to assume that software is accurate. International Journal of Forecasting 16: 349-357.
43. McCullough, B. D. (2001). Does Microsoft fix errors in Excel? In Proceedings of the 2001 joint statistical meetings. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
44. McCullough, B. D. (2004a). Fixing statistical errors in spreadsheet software: The cases of Gnumeric and Excel. CSDA Statistical Software Newsletter. Retrieved December 10, 2008, from http://www.csdassn.org/software_reports/gnumeric.pdf.
45. McCullough B. D. (2004b) Wilkinson's tests and econometric software. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement 29: 261-270.
46. McCullough B. D. (2008) Microsoft Excel's 'not the Wichmann-Hill' random number generators. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 52: 4587-4593.
47. McCullough B. D. (2009) Testing econometric software. In: Mills T. C., Patterson K. (eds) Handbook of econometrics. Pargrave, New York, pp 1293-1320.
48. McCullough B. D., Heiser D. A. (2008) On the accuracy of statistical procedures in Microsoft Excel 2007. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 52: 4570-4578.
49. McCullough B. D., Renfro C. G. (1998) Benchmarks and software standards: A case study of GARCH procedures. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement 25: 59-71.
50. McCullough B. D., Vinod H. D. (1999) The numerical reliability of econometric software. Journal of Economic Literature 37: 633-655.
51. McCullough B. D., Vinod H. D. (2003a) Comment: Econometrics and software. Journal of Economic Perspectives 17: 223-224.
52. McCullough B. D., Vinod H. D. (2003b) Verifying the solution from a nonlinear solver: A case study. The American Economic Review 93: 873-892.
53. McCullough B. D., Wilson B. (1999) On the accuracy of statistical procedures in Microsoft EXCEL 97. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 31: 27-37.
54. McCullough B. D., Wilson B. (2002) On the accuracy of statistical procedures in Microsoft Excel 2000 and Excel XP. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 40: 713-721.
55. McCullough B. D., Wilson B. (2005) On the accuracy of statistical procedures in Microsoft Excel 2003. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 49: 1244-1252.
56. McKenzie C. R., Takaoka S. (2002) 2002: A LIMDEP odyssey. Journal of Applied Econometrics 18: 241-247.
57. McKenzie C. R., Takaoka S. (2007) Eviews 5. 1. Journal of Applied Econometrics 22: 1145-1152.
58. Mixon J. W., Smith R. J. (2006) Teaching undergraduate econometrics with GRETL. Journal of Applied Econometrics 21: 1103-1107.
59. Nerlove M. (2004) Programming languages: A short history for economists. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement 29: 189-203.
60. Newbold P., Agiakloglou C., Miller J. (1994) Adventures with ARIMA software. International Journal of Forecasting 10: 573-581.
61. Renfro C. G. (2004a) A compendium of existing econometric software packages. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement 29: 359-409.
62. Renfro C. G. (2004b) Econometric software: The first fifty years in perspective. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement 29: 9-107.
63. Roberts J. A., Hann I. H., Slaughter S. A. (2006) Understanding the motivations, participation and performance of open source software developers: A longitudinal study of the Apache projects. Management Science 52: 984-999.
64. Rosenblad, A. (2008). Gretl 1.7.3. Journal of Statistical Software, 25, 19. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v25/s01.
65. Sawitzki G. (1994a) Report on the numerical reliability of data analysis systems. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 18: 289-301.
66. Sawitzki G. (1994b) Testing numerical reliability of data analysis systems. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 18: 269-286.
67. Schwarz, M., & Takhteyev, Y. (to appear). Half a century of public software institutions: Open source as a solution to the hold-up problem. Journal of Public Economic Theory.
68. Silk J. (1996) Systems estimation: A comparison of SAS, Shazam and TSP. Journal of Applied Econometrics 11: 437-450.
69. Stokes H. H. (2004) On the advantage of using two or more econometric software systems to solve the same problem. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement 29: 307-320.
70. Vinod H. D. (2000) Review of GAUSS for Windows, including its numerical accuracy. Journal of Applied Econometrics 15: 211-220.
71. Vinod H. D. (2001) Care and feeding of reproducible econometrics. Journal of Econometrics 100: 87-88.
72. Vinod H. D. (2008) Hands-on intermediate econometrics using R (1st ed.). World Scientific Publishing Company, New Jersey.
73. von Krogh G., Spaeth S. (2007) The open source software phenomenon: Characteristics that promote research. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 16: 236-253.
74. von Krogh G., Spaeth S., Lakhani K. R. (2003) Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Research Policy 32: 1217-1241.
75. West J. (2003) How open is open enough? melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Reseach Policy 32: 1258-1286.
76. Wichmann B. A., Hill I. D. (1982) Algorithm AS 183: An efficient and portable pseudo-random number generator. Applied Statistics 31: 188-190.
77. Wilkinson L. (1985) Statistics quiz: Problems which reveal deficiencies in statistical programs (1st ed.). SYSTAT, Evanston, IL.
78. Wilkinson, L. (1994). Practical guidelines for testing statistical software. In P. Dirschedl & R. Ostermann (Eds.), Computational statistics, 25th conference on statistical computing at Schloss Reisenburg. Physica, Verlag.
79. Yalta A. T. (2007) The numerical reliability of GAUSS 8. 0. The American Statistician 61: 262-268.
80. Yalta A. T. (2008) The accuracy of statistical distributions in Microsoft ® Excel 2007. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 52: 4579-4586.
81. Yalta A. T., Jenal O. (2009) On the importance of verifying forecasting results. International Journal of Forecasting 25: 62-73.
82. Yalta A. T., Lucchetti R. (2008) The GNU/Linux platform and freedom respecting software for economists. Journal of Applied Econometrics 23: 279-286.
83. Yalta A. T., Yalta A. Y. (2007) GRETL 1. 6. 0 and its numerical accuracy. Journal of Applied Econometrics 22: 849-854.
84. Zeileis A., Kleiber C. (2005) Validating multiple structural change models-a case study. Journal of Applied Econometrics 20: 685-690.