Cluster solver for dynamical mean-field theory with linear scaling in inverse temperature

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 81, Issue 5, 2010, Pages

  Khatami, E ^a,b   Lee, C R ^c   Bai, Z J ^d   Scalettar, R T ^e   Jarrell, M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d University of California Davis   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL BOTTLENECKS; DYNAMICAL MEAN-FIELD THEORY; ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE THEORY; INVERSE TEMPERATURES; LINEAR SCALING; LOW TEMPERATURES; MODEL HAMILTONIANS; QUANTUM MONTE CARLO; REAL-SPACE; SIGN PROBLEM; STRONGLY CORRELATED MATERIALS; TIME SLICE;

ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE; MEAN FIELD THEORY; PHASE TRANSITIONS;

MONTE CARLO METHODS;

EID: 77952405632     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.81.056703     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. R. Blankenbecler, D. J. Scalapino, and R. L. Sugar, Phys. Rev. D 24, 2278 (1981). 10.1103/PhysRevD.24.2278
2. J. E. Hirsch, Phys. Rev. B 28, 4059 (1983). 10.1103/PhysRevB.28.4059
3. L. Chen and A.-M. S. Tremblay, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 6, 547 (1992). 10.1142/S0217979292000323
4. P. L. Silvestrelli, S. Baroni, and R. Car, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1148 (1993). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1148
5. Quantum Monte Carlo Methods in Physics and Chemistry, NATO Science Series, Series C: Mathematical and Physical Sciences Vol. 525, edited by, M. P. Nightingale, and, Cyrus J. Umrigar, (Kluwer Academic, New York, 1998).
6. F. F. Assaad, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 796 (1999). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.796
7. S. Zhang and H. Krakauer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 136401 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.136401
8. E. Y. Loh, J. E. Gubernatis, R. T. Scalettar, S. R. White, D. J. Scalapino, and R. L. Sugar, Phys. Rev. B 41, 9301 (1990). 10.1103/PhysRevB.41. 9301
9. J. E. Hirsch and S. Tang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 591 (1989). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.591
10. T. Paiva, R. T. Scalettar, C. Huscroft, and A. K. McMahan, Phys. Rev. B 63, 125116 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.125116
11. N. Paris, K. Bouadim, F. Hebert, G. G. Batrouni, and R. T. Scalettar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 046403 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.046403 (Pubitemid 46168673)
12. J. E. Hirsch and R. M. Fye, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2521 (1986). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.2521
13. M. Jarrell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 168 (1992). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.168
14. A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. Rozenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 13 (1996). 10.1103/RevModPhys.68.13
15. M. H. Hettler, A. N. Tahvildar-Zadeh, M. Jarrell, T. Pruschke, and H. R. Krishnamurthy, Phys. Rev. B 58, R7475 (1998) 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.R7475
16. M. H. Hettler, M. Mukherjee, M. Jarrell, and H. R. Krishnamurthy, Phys. Rev. B 61, 12739 (2000) 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.12739
17. M. Jarrell, T. Maier, C. Huscroft, and S. Moukouri, Phys. Rev. B 64, 195130 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.195130
18. G. Kotliar, S. Y. Savrasov, G. Palsson, and G. Biroli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 186401 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.186401
19. M. Caffarel and W. Krauth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1545 (1994). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.1545
20. E. Koch, G. Sangiovanni, and O. Gunnarsson, Phys. Rev. B 78, 115102 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.115102
21. Th. Maier, M. Jarrell, T. Pruschke, and M. H. Hettler, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 1027 (2005). 10.1103/RevModPhys.77.1027 (Pubitemid 43272529)
22. Multiband models which involve only interband hybridization can be easily treated in our method as in DQMC. In DQMC, density-density interband/intersite interactions are known to produce a sign problem which is significantly worse than onsite interactions. Spin-flip (Hund's rule) type terms are even worse. This is also true in the Hirsch-Fye approach. See K. Held, Ph.D. thesis, Universität Augsburg, 1999.
23. For more information about the minimization method please see W. H. Press, Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1996), p. 678.
24. C. J. Bolech, S. S. Kancharla, and G. Kotliar, Phys. Rev. B 67, 075110 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.075110
25. C. A. Perroni, H. Ishida, and A. Liebsch, Phys. Rev. B 75, 045125 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.045125
26. A. Liebsch and N.-H. Tong, Phys. Rev. B 80, 165126 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.165126
27. We have verified the reliability of this method in dealing with systems with coexisting metallic and insulating solutions by reproducing the hysteresis curve in Fig. 2 of
28. A. Macridin, M. Jarrell, and Th. Maier, Phys. Rev. B 74, 085104 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.085104 (Pubitemid 44157421)
29. Th. Maier, M. Jarrell, Th. Pruschke, and J. Keller, Eur. Phys. J. B 13, 613 (2000). 10.1007/s100510050077
30. M. Jarrell and J. Gubernatis, Phys. Rep. 269, 133 (1996). 10.1016/0370-1573(95)00074-7 (Pubitemid 126175303)
31. R. M. Fye, Phys. Rev. B 33, 6271 (1986). 10.1103/PhysRevB.33.6271
32. R. M. Fye and R. T. Scalettar, Phys. Rev. B 36, 3833 (1987). 10.1103/PhysRevB.36.3833
33. K. Mikelsons, A. Macridin, and M. Jarrell, Phys. Rev. E 79, 057701 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.057701
34. A. N. Rubtsov, V. V. Savkin, and A. I. Lichtenstein, Phys. Rev. B 72, 035122 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.035122 (Pubitemid 41506692)
35. F. F. Assaad and T. C. Lang, Phys. Rev. B 76, 035116 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.035116
36. S. M. A. Rombouts, K. Heyde, and N. Jachowicz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4155 (1999). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.4155
37. P. Werner A. Comanac Luca dé Medici, Matthias Troyer, and Andrew J. Millis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 076405 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.076405 (Pubitemid 44273894)
38. E. Gull, P. Werner, A. Millis, and M. Troyer, Phys. Rev. B 76, 235123 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.235123
39. N. Blümer, Phys. Rev. B 76, 205120 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevB.76. 205120