Erratum: Differences in spawning date between populations of common frog reveal local adaptation (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2010) 107, (8292-8297) DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0913792107);Differences in spawning date between populations of common frog reveal local adaptation

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 107, Issue 18, 2010, Pages 8292-8297

  Phillimore, Albert B ^a   Hadfield, Jarrod D ^b   Jones, Owen R ^c   Smithers, Richard J ^d  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH   (Germany)

^d Woodland Trust   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Climate change; Ecogeographic; Phenology; Plasticity; Quantitative genetics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CLIMATE CHANGE; FROG; HUMAN; LOCAL ADAPTATION; NONHUMAN; POPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPAWNING; TEMPERATURE; UNITED KINGDOM;

RANA TEMPORARIA;

EID: 77952401762     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1203538109     Document Type: Erratum

References (45)

1. Mayr E (1963) Animal Species and Evolution (Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge, MA).
2. Endler JA (1977) Geographic Variation, Speciation, and Clines (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton).
3. Deutsch CA, et al. (2008) Impacts of climate warming on terrestrial ectotherms across latitude. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:6668-6672.
4. Davis M, Shaw R (2001) Range shifts and adaptive responses to Quaternary climate change. Science 292:673-679. (Pubitemid 32385531)
5. Kawecki TJ, Ebert D (2004) Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol Lett 7:1225-1241.
6. Beebee TJC (1995) Amphibian breeding and climate. Nature 374:219-220.
7. Loman J (2009) Primary and secondary phenology. Does it pay a frog to spawn early? J Zool 279:64-70.
8. Walther G-R, et al. (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416:389-395. (Pubitemid 34272866)
9. Beattie RC, Ashton RJ, Milner AGP (1991) A field study of fertilization and embryonic development in the common frog (Rana temporaria) with particular reference to acidity and temperature. Journal of Applied Ecology 28:346-357.
10. Carroll EA, Sparks TH, Collinson N, Beebee TJC (2009) Influence of temperature on the spatial distribution of first spawning dates of the common frog (Rana temporaria) in the UK. Global Change Biology 15:467-473.
11. Gienapp P, Teplitsky C, Alho JS, Mills JA, Merila J (2008) Climate change and evolution: Disentangling environmental and genetic responses. Mol Ecol 17:167-178. (Pubitemid 350292455)
12. Laugen AT, Laurila A, Rasanen K, Merila J (2003) Latitudinal countergradient variation in the common frog (Rana temporaria) development rates - Evidence for local adaptation. J Evol Biol 16:996-1005. (Pubitemid 37073869)
13. Palo JU, et al. (2003) Latitudinal divergence of common frog (Rana temporaria) life history traits by natural selection: Evidence from a comparison of molecular and quantitative genetic data. Mol Ecol 12:1963-1978.
14. Lande R (1977) Statistical tests for natural-selection on quantitative characters. Evolution 31:442-444.
15. Turelli M, Gillespie JH, Lande R (1988) Rate tests for selection on quantitative characters during macroevolution and microevolution. Evolution 42:1085-1089.
16. Spitze K (1993) Population-structure in Dapnia obtusa: Quantitative genetic and allozymic variation. Genetics 135:367-374.
17. Merilä J, Crnokrak P (2001) Comparison of genetic differentiation at marker loci and quantitative traits. J Evol Biol 14:892-903. (Pubitemid 34029797)
18. Leinonen T, Cano JM, Makinen H, Merila J (2006) Contrasting patterns of body shape and neutral genetic divergence in marine and lake populations of threespine sticklebacks. J Evol Biol 19:1803-1812. (Pubitemid 44571619)
19. Whitlock MC (2008) Evolutionary inference from QST. Mol Ecol 17:1885-1896.
20. Falconer DS, MacKay TFC (1996) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics (Longman, Essex), 4th Ed, Harlow, Essex, UK.
21. Knight J, et al. (2009) Do global temperature trends over the last decade falsify climate predictions? Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 90:S1-S196.
22. Miaud C, Guyetant R, Elmberg J (1999) Variations in life-history traits in the common frog Rana temporaria (Amphibia: Anura): A literature review and new data from the French Alps. Journal of Zoological Society of London 249:61-73. (Pubitemid 29447102)
23. Liefting M, Hoffmann AA, Ellers J (2009) Plasticity versus environmental canalization: Population differences in thermal responses along a latitudinal gradient in Drosophila serrata. Evolution 63:1954-1963.
24. Visser ME (2008) Keeping up with a warming world; Assessing the rate of adaptation to climate change. Proc R Soc London Ser B 275:649-659.
25. Murphy JM, et al. (2007) A methodology for probabilistic predictions of regional climate change from perturbed physics ensembles. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 365:1993-2028.
26. Sparks TH, Tryjanowski P, Cooke A, Crick H, Kuzniak S (2007) Vertebrate phenology at similar latitudes: Temperature responses differ between Poland and the United Kingdom. Climate Research 34:93-98. (Pubitemid 351728306)
27. Bachmann K (1969) Temperature adaptations of amphibian embryos. Am Nat 103:115-130.
28. Bridle JR, Vines T (2007) Limits to evolution at range margins: When and why does adaptation fail? Trends Ecol Evol 22:140-147.
29. Ludwig GX, et al. (2006) Short- and long-term population dynamical consequences of asymmetric climate change in black grouse. Proc Royal Soc London Ser B 273:2009-2016.
30. Hitchings SP, Beebee TJC (1997) Genetic substructuring as a result of barriers to gene flow in urban Rana temporaria (common frog) populations: Implications for biodiversity conservation. Heredity 79:117-127.
31. Gaston KJ, Warren PH, Thompson K, Smith RM (2005) Urban domestic gardens (IV): The extent of the resource and its associated features. Biodiversity and Conservation 14:3327-3349. (Pubitemid 41813737)
32. Houlahan JE, Findlay CS, Scmidt BR, Meyer AH, Kuzmin SL (2000) Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines. Nature 404:752-755.
33. Stuart SN, et al. (2004) Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306:1783-1786.
34. Fukami T, Wardle DA (2005) Long-term ecological dynamics: Reciprocal insights from natural and anthropogenic gradients. Proc R Soc London Ser B 272:2105-2115. (Pubitemid 41475728)
35. Pickett STA (1989) Space-for-time substitution as an alternative. Long-Term Studies in Ecology: Approaches and Alternatives, ed Likens GE (Springer, New York), pp 110-135.
36. La Sorte FA, Lee TM, Wilman H, Jetz W (2009) Disparities between observed and predicted impacts of climate change on winter bird assemblages. Proc R Soc London Ser B 276:3167-3174.
37. Perry M, Hollis D (2005) The generation of monthly gridded datasets for a range of climatic variables over the UK. International Journal of Climatology 25:1041-1054. (Pubitemid 40974590)
38. Clark CD, Gibbard PL, Rose J (2004) Pleistocene glacial limits in England, Scotland and Wales. Quaternary Glaciations - Extent and Chronology, eds Ehlers J, Gibbard PL (Elsevier, Amsterdam), pp 47-82.
39. Hadfield JD (2010) MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: The MCMCglmm R package. Journal of Statistical Software 33:1-22.
40. Visser ME, Both C (2005) Shifts in phenology due to global climate change: The need for a yardstick. Proc R Soc London Ser B 272:2561-2569.
41. Thackeray SJ, et al. (2010) Trophic level imbalances in rates of phenological change for marine, freshwater and terrestrial environments. Global Change Biology, in press.
42. van de Pol M, Wright J (2009) A simple method for distinguishing within- versus between-subject effects using mixed models. Anim Behav 77:753-758.
43. Nakicenovic N, et al. (2000) Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), p 598.
44. R Development Core Team (2009) R: A language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna). Available at http://www.R-project.org.
45. Conover DO, Schulz ET (1995) Phenotypic similarity and the evolutionary significance of countergradient variation. Trends Ecol Evol 10:248-252.