Imaging hemorrhagic stroke with magnetic induction tomography: Realistic simulation and evaluation

Physiological Measurement

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 809-827

  Chen, Yinan ^a,b   Yan, Ming ^b   Chen, Dayu ^b   Hamsch, Matthias ^c   Liu, Hui ^b   Jin, Hua ^b   Vauhkonen, Marko ^d,e   Igney, Claudia H ^c   Kahlert, Joachim ^c   Wang, Yuanyuan ^a  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Netherlands)

^c PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Germany)

^d Numcore Ltd   (Finland)

^e UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDDY CURRENT TESTING; TISSUE; TOMOGRAPHY;

BIO-IMPEDANCE; BRAIN TISSUE; CONDUCTIVITY DISTRIBUTIONS; DETECTABILITY; HEMORRHAGIC STROKE; MAGNETIC INDUCTION TOMOGRAPHY; NONCONTACT METHODS; REALISTIC EVALUATIONS; REALISTIC SIMULATION; TOMOGRAPHY SYSTEM;

BRAIN;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; COMPLICATION; EVALUATION STUDY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MAGNETISM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROCEDURES; STROKE; TOMOGRAPHY;

BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; STROKE; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 77952381083     PISSN: 09673334     EISSN: 13616579     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/31/6/006     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Adler A, Rechard Y and Lionheart R B W 2008 A measure of the information content of EIT data Physiol. Meas. 29 101-9
2. Casanova R, Silva A and Borges A R 2004 MIT image reconstruction based on edge-preserving regularization Physiol. Meas. 25 195-207
3. Ferrant M, Nabavi A, Macq B, Jolesz F A, Kikinis R and Warfield S K 2001 Registration of 3-D intraoperative MR images of the brain using a finite element biomechanical model IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20 1384-97
4. Griffiths H, Steward W R and Gough W 1999 Magnetic induction tomography: a measuring system for biological tissues Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 873 335-45
5. Holder S D 2005 Electrical Impedance Tomography: Methods, History and Applications (Bristol: Institute of Physics Publishing) p 215
6. Korjenevsky A, Cherepenin V and Sapetsky S 2000 Magentic induction tomography: experimental realization Physiol. Meas. 21 489-94
7. Kyriacou K S, Mohamed A, Miller K and Neff S 2002 Brain mechanics for neurosurgery: modeling issues Biomech. Model Mechanobiol. 1 151-64
8. Lighthall W J 1988 Controlled cortical impact: a new experimental brain injury model J. Neurotrauma 5 1-15
9. Lingwood B, Dunster K, Colditz P and Ward L 2002 Noninvasive measurement of cerebral bioimpedance for detection of cerebral edema in the neonatal piglet Brain Res. 954 97-105
10. Lionheart R B W 2004 EIT reconstruction algorithms: pitfalls, challenges and recent developments Physiol. Meas. 25 125-42
11. Merwa R, Hollaus K and Scharfetter H 2004 Detection of brain oedema using magnetic induction tomography: a feasibility study of the likely sensitivity and detectability Physiol. Meas. 25 347-54
12. Miller K, Chinzei K, Orssengo G and Bendnarz P 2000 Mechanical properties of brain tissue in-vivo: experiment and computer simulation J. Biomech. 33 1369-76
13. Nagashima T, Shirakuni T and Rapoport Si 1990 A two-dimensional, finite element analysis of vasogenic brain edema Neurol. Med. Chir. 1 1-9
14. Rao J N K and Scott J 1981 The analysis of categorical data from complex sample surveys: chi-squared tests for goodness of fit and independence in two-way tables J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 374 221-30
15. Scharfetter H, Casanas R and Rosell J 2003 Biological tissue characterization by magnetic induction spectroscopy (MIS): requirements and limitations IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 50 870-80
16. Shaywitz B A, Shaywitz S E, Pugh K R, Constable R T, Skudlarski P, Fulbright R K, Bronen R A, Fletcher J M, Shankweiler D P, Katz L and Gores J C 1995 Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language Nature 373 607-9
17. Soleimani M and William L R B 2006 Absolute conductivity reconstruction in magnetic induction tomography using nonlinear method IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 25 1521-30
18. Steffen M, Heimann K, Bernstein N and Leonhardt S 2008 Multichannel simultaneous magnetic induction measurement system (MUSIMITOS) Physiol. Meas. 29 S291
19. Tizzard A and Bayford R H 2007 Improving the finite element model of human head by warping using elastic deformation Physiol. Meas. 28 163-82
20. Vauhkonen M, Hamsch M and Igney C H 2008 A measurement system and image reconstruction in magnetic induction tomography Physiol. Meas. 29 445-54
21. Warfield S K et al 2005 Capturing intraoperative deformations: Research experience at Brigham and Womens's hospital Med. Image Anal. 9 145-62
22. Watson S, Williams R J, Griffiths H, Gough W and Morris A 2002 Frequency downconversion and phase noise in MIT Physiol. Meas. 23 189-94
23. Ziemkiewicz O C, Taylor R L and Zhu J Z 2005 The Finite Element Method: Its Basis and Fundamentals 6th edn (Burlington, VT: Elsevier) p 203
24. Zolgharni M et al 2009 Imaging cerebral haemorrhage with magnetic induction tomography: numerical modelling Physiol. Meas. 30 187-200
25. Zubal G, Harrell C R, Smith E O, Rattner Z, Gindi G and Hoffer P B 1994 Computerized three-dimensional segmented human anatomy Med. Phys. 21 299-302