Functional contrast-enhanced CT for evaluation of acute ischemic stroke does not increase the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 817-821

  Lima, Fabricio Oliveira ^a   Lev, M H ^a   Levy, R A ^b   Silva, G S ^a   Ebril, M ^c   De Camargo, E C ^a   Pomerantz, S ^a   Singhal, A B ^a   Greer, D M ^a   Ay, H ^a   Gilberto Gonzalez R ^a   Koroshetz, W J ^d   Smith, W S ^e   Furie, K L ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETYLCYSTEINE; CREATININE; IODINATED CONTRAST MEDIUM; IOPAMIDOL;

ACUTE DISEASE; ACUTE NEPHROPATHY; AGED; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY PERFUSION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTRAST INDUCED NEPHROPATHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; FEMALE; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; HUMAN; KIDNEY DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT SAFETY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ACUTE DISEASE; AGED; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; COMORBIDITY; DRUG TOXICITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; IODINE; KIDNEY DISEASES; MALE; MASSACHUSETTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; STROKE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77952373983     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1927     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Smith WS, Roberts HC, Chuang NA, et al. Safety and feasibility of a CT protocol for acute stroke: combined CT, CT angiography, and CT perfusion imaging in 53 consecutive patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:688-690 (Pubitemid 36460741)
2. Lev MH, Farkas J, Rodriguez VR, et al. CT angiography in the rapid triage of patients with hyperacute stroke to intraarterial thrombolysis: accuracy in the detection of large vessel thrombus. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001;25:520-528 (Pubitemid 33041507)
3. Wintermark M, Reichhart M, Thiran JP, et al. Prognostic accuracy of cerebral blood flow measurement by perfusion computed tomography, at the time of emergency room admission, in acute stroke patients. Ann Neurol 2002;51:417-432 (Pubitemid 34260772)
4. Nash K, Hafeez A, Hou S. Hospital-acquired renal insufficiency. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;39:930-936
5. Gruberg L, Mintz GS, Mehran R, et al. The prognostic implications of further renal function deterioration within 48 h of interventional coronary procedures in patients with pre-existent chronic renal insufficiency. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1542-1548
6. Morcos SK, Thomsen HS, Webb JA. Contrast-media-induced nephrotoxicity: a consensus report - Contrast Media Safety Committee, European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR). Eur Radiol 1999;9:1602-1613
7. McCullough PA, Adam A, Becker CR, et al. Epidemiology and prognostic implications of contrast-induced nephropathy. Am J Cardiol 2006;98:5K-13K (Pubitemid 44292089)
8. Mehran R, Nikolsky E. Contrast-induced nephropathy: definition, epidemiology, and patients at risk. Kidney Int Suppl 2006:S11-15
9. Rao QA, Newhouse JH. Risk of nephropathy after intravenous administration of contrast material: a critical literature analysis. Radiology 2006;239:392-397
10. Wyman RM, Safian RD, Portway V, et al. Current complications of diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac catheterization. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;12:1400-1406
11. Langner S, Stumpe S, Kirsch M, et al. No increased risk for contrast-induced nephropathy after multiple CT perfusion studies of the brain with a nonionic, dimeric, iso-osmolal contrast medium. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1525-1529
12. Cramer BC, Parfrey PS, Hutchinson TA, et al. Renal function following infusion of radiologic contrast material: a prospective controlled study. Arch Intern Med 1985;145:87-89
13. Heller CA, Knapp J, Halliday J, et al. Failure to demonstrate contrast nephrotoxicity. Med J Aust 1991;155:329-332
14. Newhouse JH, Kho D, Rao QA, et al Frequency of serum creatinine changes in the absence of iodinated contrast material: implications for studies of contrast nephrotoxicity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:376-382
15. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, et al. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation - Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:461-470
16. National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;39(2 suppl 1):S1-266
17. Krol AL, Dzialowski I, Roy J, et al. Incidence of radiocontrast nephropathy in patients undergoing acute stroke computed tomography angiography. Stroke 2007;38:2364-2366 (Pubitemid 47457583)
18. Hopyan JJ, Gladstone DJ, Mallia G, et al. Renal safety of CT angiography and perfusion imaging in the emergency evaluation of acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1826-1830 Epub 2008 Aug 21
19. McCullough PA, Wolyn R, Rocher LL, et al. Acute renal failure after coronary intervention: incidence, risk factors, and relationship to mortality. Am J Med 1997;103:368-375 (Pubitemid 27506242)
20. McCullough PA, Sandberg KR. Epidemiology of contrast-induced nephropathy. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2003;4(suppl 5):S3-9
21. Persson PB, Hansell P, Liss P. Pathophysiology of contrast medium-induced nephropathy. Kidney Int 2005;68:14-22
22. Josephson SA, Dillon WP, Smith WS. Incidence of contrast nephropathy from cerebral CT angiography and CT perfusion imaging. Neurology 2005;64:1805-1806 (Pubitemid 40695827)
23. Solomon R, Deray G. How to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy and manage risk patients: practical recommendations. Kidney Int Suppl 2006:S51-53