Integrating telemedicine in Urban pediatric primary care: Provider perspectives and performance

Telemedicine and e-Health

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 280-288

  McConnochie, Kenneth ^a   Wood, Nancy ^a   Herendeen, Neil ^a,b   Ten Hoopen, Cynthia ^a   Denk, Larry ^a,b   Neuderfer, Judith ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b ROCHESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Acute illness; Childcare; Emergency department; Low income population; Primary care; Telemedicine

Indexed keywords

CHILDCARE; EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS; OVERALL ACCEPTABILITY; PERFORMANCE MEASURE; PRIMARY CARE; PROVIDER SURVEYS; TELEMEDICINE SERVICES;

EMERGENCY ROOMS; HEALTH; SURVEYS;

TELEMEDICINE;

ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE; PEDIATRICS; POVERTY; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; TELEMEDICINE; UNITED STATES;

CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; NEW YORK; PEDIATRICS; POVERTY; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; TELEMEDICINE; URBAN HEALTH SERVICES;

EID: 77952369755     PISSN: 15305627     EISSN: 15563669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2009.0112     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. McConnochie KM, Wood NE, Kitzman HJ, Herendeen NE, Roy J, Roghmann KJ. Telemedicine reduces absences due to illness in urban childcare: Evaluation of an innovation. Pediatrics 2005;115:1273-1282.
2. McConnochie KM, Wood NE, Herendeen NE, Ng P, Noyes K, Wang H, Roghmann KJ. Acute illness care patterns change with use of telemedicine. Pediatrics 2009;123:e989-e995.
3. American Academy of Pediatrics. Policy statement: Organizational principles to guide and define the child healthcare system and=or improve the health of all children. Pediatrics 2004;113:1545-1547.
4. Medical Home Initiatives for Children with Special Needs Project Advisory Committee. The medical home. Pediatrics 2002;110:184-186.
5. Starfield B. Primary care: Concept, evaluation, and policy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
6. Cherry DK, Burt CW, Woodwell DA. Advance data from vital and health statistics; No.337 (8=13=03). National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2001 Summary. Available at www.cdc.gov=nchs=data=ad=ad337.pdf (last accessed February 13, 2010).
7. Committee on the Future of Emergency Care in the United States Health System Emergency Care for Children: Growing Pains. 2006 Institute of Medicine. Available at www.iom.edu=CMS=3809= 16107=35002.aspx (last accessed February 13, 2010).
8. Wyn R, Ojeda V, Ranji U, Salganicoff A. Women, work and family health: A balancing act. Issue brief. Kaiser Womens Health Survey 2001. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation, April 2003.
9. Hanson D, Calhoun J, Smith D. Changes in provider attitudes toward telemedicine. Telemed J E Health 2009;15:39-43.
10. Bashur R. Telemedicine effects: Cost, quality and access. J Med Syst 1995;19:81-91.
11. May C, Harrison R, MacFarlane A, Williams T, Mair F, Wallace P. Why do telemedicine systems fail to normalize as stable models of service delivery? J Telemed Telecare 2003;9(Suppl 1):25-26.
12. Hu PJ, Chau PY. Physician acceptance of telemedicine technology: An empirical investigation. Top Health Inf Manag 1999;19:20-35.
13. Cohn RJ, Goodenough B. Health professionals attitudes to videoconferencing in paediatric health-care. J Telemed Telecare 2002;8:274-282.
14. Gaggioli A, diCarlo S, Mantovani R, Castelnuovo G, Riva G. A telemedicine survey among Milan doctors. J Telemed Telecare 2005;11:29-34.
15. McConnochie KM. Potential of telemedicine in pediatric primary care. Pediatrics in review. September 2006, online edition. Elm Grove, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics.
16. Alpert JJ, Charney E. The education of physicians for primary care. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Bureau of Health Services Research, 1973 (DHEW publication no. [HRA] 74-3113).
17. American Academy of Pediatrics, Medical Home Initiatives for Children With Special Needs Project Advisory Committee. The medical home. Pediatrics 2002;110:184-186.
18. Randolph D, Murray M, Swanson JA, Margolis PA. Behind schedule: Improving access to care for children one practice at a time. Pediatrics 2004;113:e230-e237.
19. Isaacman DJ, Davis HW. Pediatric emergency medicine: State of the art. Pediatrics 1993;91:587-590.
20. Luo X, Liu G, Frush K, Lloyd A. Hey. Childrens health insurance status and emergency department utilization in the United States. Pediatrics 2003;112:314-319.
21. McCaig LF, Ly N. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2000 Emergency Department Summary. Advance data from vital and health statistics; No.326, Hyattsville, MD; National Center for Health Statistics. Available at www.cdc.gov=nchs=data=ad= ad326.pdf (last accessed February 13, 2010).
22. Davis K, McEvoy Doty M, Shea K, Stremikis K. Health information technology and physician perceptions of quality of care and satisfaction. Health Policy 2009;90:239-246.
23. Brynjolfsson E. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Quoted by Lohr S. How to Make Electronic Medical Records a Reality. Business Section, New York Times 2=28=09. Available at www.nytimes .com=2009=03=01=business=01unbox.html?-r1&scp1&sqHow%20to% 20Make%20Electronic%20Medical%20Records%20a%20Reality&stcse (last accessed February 13, 2010).