Time-resolved computed tomography imaging of the aorta: A feasibility study

Journal of Thoracic Imaging

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 161-167

  Sommer, Wieland H ^a   Clevert, Dirk A ^a   Bamberg, Fabian ^a   Helck, Andreas ^a   Albrecht, Edda ^a   Reiser, Maximilian F ^a   Becker, Christoph R ^a   Nikolaou, Konstantin ^a  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aortic dissection; Aortic stent graft; Contrast medium; Dynamic; Endoleaks; Time resolved

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANEURYSM SURGERY; AORTA; AORTA DISSECTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONFERENCE PAPER; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; RADIATION DOSE;

AGED; ANEURYSM, DISSECTING; AORTIC ANEURYSM; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77952364446     PISSN: 08835993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RTI.0b013e3181d9c9de     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Rubin GD, Kalra MK. MDCT angiography of the thoracic aorta. In: Saini S, Rubin GS, Kalra MK, eds. MDCT: A Practical Approach. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer; 2006:111.
2. Rubin GD. CT angiography of the thoracic aorta. Semin Roentgenol. 2003;38:115-134.
3. Lawler LP, Fishman EK. Multidetector row computed tomography of the aorta and peripheral arteries. Cardiol Clin. 2003;21:607-629.
4. Theisen D, Tengg-Kobligk H, Michaely H, et al. CT angiography of the aorta. Radiologe. 2007;47:982-992.
5. Ishida M, Kato N, Hirano T, et al. Thoracic CT findings following endovascular stent-graft treatment for thoracic aortic aneurysm. J Endovasc Ther. 2007;14:333-341.
6. Iezzi R, Basilico R, Giancristofaro D, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus color duplex ultrasound imaging in the follow-up of patients after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49:552-560.
7. Clevert DA, Minaifar N, Kopp R, et al. Imaging of endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). A pictorial comparison with CTA. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2009;41:151-168.
8. Huda W, Ogden KM, Khorasani MR. Converting dose-length product to effective dose at CT. Radiology. 2008;248:995-1003.
9. Wintersperger B, Jakobs T, Herzog P, et al. Aorto-iliac multidetector-row CT angiography with low kV settings: improved vessel enhancement and simultaneous reduction of radiation dose. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:334-341.
10. Stolzmann P, Frauenfelder T, Pfammatter T, et al. Endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: detection with dual-energy dual-source CT. Radiology. 2008;249: 682-691.
11. Cohen EI, Weinreb DB, Siegelbaum RH, et al. Time-resolved MR angiography for the classification of endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008; 27:500-503.
12. Hope TA, Zarins CK, Herfkens RJ. Initial experience characterizing a type I endoleak from velocity profiles using time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49:1580-1584.