Community corrections facilities for juvenile offenders in Ohio: An examination of treatment integrity and recidivism

Criminal Justice and Behavior

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 695-708

  Lowenkamp, Christopher T ^b   Makarios, Matthew D ^a   Latessa, Edward J ^b   Lemke, Richard ^b   Smith, Paula ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN PARKSIDE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

Community corrections facilities; Juvenile offenders; Treatment integrity

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952358205     PISSN: 00938548     EISSN: 15523594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093854810363721     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Andrews, D.A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R.D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F.T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
2. Aos, S. (1997). Outcome evaluation of Washington State's research-based programs for juveniles. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
3. Barnoski, R. (2004). Outcome evaluation of Washington State's research-based programs for juvenile offenders. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
4. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1989). Children in custody 1975-85: The census of public and private juvenile detention, correctional, and shelter facilities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
5. DeComo, R., Tunis, S., Krisberg, B., Herrera, N., Rudenstine, S., & Del Rosario. D. (1995). Juveniles taken into custody: Fiscal year 1992. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
6. Dowden, C., & Andrews, D.A. (1999). What works in young offender treatment: A meta-analysis. Forum on Corrections Research, 11, 1-6.
7. Gendreau, P., & Andrews, D.A. (1996). The Correctional Program Assessment Inventory (6th ed.). Saint John, Canada: University of New Brunswick.
8. Gendreau, P., & Ross, R.R. (1979). Effective correctional treatment: Bibliotherapy for cynics. Crime & Delinquency, 25, 463-489.
9. Gray, G.A. (1997). Does coercion play a significant role in community treatment programs that reduce offender recidivism? Unpublished master's thesis, University of New Brunswick, Canada.
10. Holsinger A.M. (1999). Examining the black box: Assessing the relationship between program integrity and recidivism. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati, OH.
11. Latessa, E.J., & Holsinger, A.M. (1999). Evaluation of the Ohio Department of Youth Services Community Corrections Facilities. Unpublished technical report, University of Cincinnati, OH. Available from http://criminaljustice.cech.uc.edu/research_reports.
12. Lipsey, M.W. (1999). Can intervention rehabilitate serious delinquents? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 564, 142-166.
13. Lowenkamp, C.T., & Latessa, E.J. (2002). Evaluation of Ohio's community based correctional facilities and halfway house programs: Final report. Unpublished technical report, University of Cincinnati, OH. Available from http://criminaljustice.cech.uc.edu/research_reports.
14. Lowenkamp, C.T., & Latessa, E.J. (2004). Understanding the risk principle: How and why correctional interventions can harm low risk offenders. In Topics in community corrections: Assessment issues for managers (pp. 3-8). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
15. Lowenkamp, C.T., & Latessa, E.J. (2005). Evaluation of Ohio's RECLAIM funded programs, community corrections facilities, and DYS facilities. Unpublished technical report, University of Cincinnati. Available from http://criminaljustice.cech.uc.edu/research_reports.
16. Lowenkamp, C.T., Latessa, E.J., & Smith, P. (2006). Does correctional program quality really matter? The impact of adhering to the principles of effective intervention. Criminology and Public Policy, 5, 575-594.
17. Lowenkamp, C.T., Pealer, J., Smith, P., & Latessa, E.J. (2006). Adhering to the risk and need principles: Does it matter for supervision based programs? Federal Probation, 70, 3-8.
18. Nesovic, A. (2003). Psychometric evaluation of the Correctional Program Assessment Inventory (CPAI). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
19. Palmer, T. (1994). A profile of correctional effectiveness and new directions for research. Albany: State University of New York Press.
20. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (Rev. ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.