An innovative toolkit to support normal birth

Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 270-272

  Baldwin, Janet ^a   Brodrick, Alison ^a   Cowley, Sophie ^a   Mason, Nicky ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; LABOR; MATERNAL CARE; MIDWIFE; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; OBSTETRICIAN; PHYSICIAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAFETY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; UNITED KINGDOM; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MATERNAL HEALTH SERVICES; MIDWIFERY; PARTURITION; PREGNANCY; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 77952350219     PISSN: 15269523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.11.013     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. National Health Service Institute for Innovation and Improvement Web site. Delivering quality and value. Focus on caesarean section. Available from: http://www.networks.nhs.uk/uploads/06/10/focusoncsection_v1.pdf [Accessed September 30, 2009]. http://www.networks.nhs.uk/uploads/06/10/focusoncsection_v1.pdf.
2. Villar J., Carroli G., Zavaleta N., Donner A., Wojdyla D., Faundes A., et al. Maternal and neonatal risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: Multicentre prospective study. BMJ 2007, 335:1025.
3. Deneux-Tharaux C., Carmona E., Bouvier-Colle M., Bréart G. Postpartum maternal mortality and caesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006, 108(3 Pt 1):541-548.
4. Liu T.C., Chen C.S., Tsai Y.W., Lin H.C. Taiwan's high rate of caesarean births: Impacts of national health insurance and fetal gender preference. Birth 2007, 34:115-122.
5. Gray R., Quigley M.A., Hockley C., Kurinczuk J.J., Goldacre M., Brocklehurst P. Caesarean delivery and risk of stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy: A retrospective cohort study in an English population. BJOG 2007, 114:264-270.
6. Jackson N., Paterson-Brown S. Physical sequelae of caesarean section. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2001, 15:49-61.
7. Attaining and maintaining best practices in the use of caesarean sections. An analysis of four Ontario hospitals 2000, Ontario Women's Health Council, Ontario Women's Health Council, Ontario, Canada.
8. Pathways to success: A self-improvement toolkit. Focus on normal birth and reducing caesarean section rates. Coventry, England: NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement 2007, National Health Service Institute for Innovation and Improvement.
9. England Department of Health Web site. Maternity matters: Choice, access and continuity of care in a safe service. Available from: www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_074199.pdf [Accessed September 5, 2009]. http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/%40dh/%40en/documents/digitalasset/dh_074199.pdf.
10. Martin J.A., Hamilton B.E., Sutton P.D., Ventura S.J., Menacker F., Kirmeyer S., et al. Births: Final data for 2006. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2009, 57.
11. Sakala C., Corry M.P. Evidence-based maternity care: What it is and what it can achieve 2008, Milbank Memorial Fund, New York.
12. National Institutes of Health Web site. National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement on cesarean delivery on maternal request. Available from: http://consensus.nih.gov/2006/CesareanStatement_Final053106.pdf [Accessed December 13, 2009]. http://consensus.nih.gov/2006/CesareanStatement_Final053106.pdf.