Foundation of fractional Langevin equation: Harmonization of a many-body problem

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 81, Issue 5, 2010, Pages

  Lizana, Ludvig ^a   Ambjörnsson, Tobias ^b   Taloni, Alessandro ^c   Barkai, Eli ^d   Lomholt, Michael A ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^d BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DYNAMICAL EQUATION; FIRST-PRINCIPLES; INTERACTION POTENTIALS; LANGEVIN EQUATION; MANY-BODY PROBLEMS; MANY-PARTICLE SYSTEMS; MICROSCOPIC DESCRIPTION; PHENOMENOLOGICAL MODELS; SINGLE-PARTICLE EQUATIONS; STOCHASTIC FRAMEWORK; TRACER PARTICLE;

PHASE TRANSITIONS;

EQUATIONS OF MOTION;

EID: 77952338160     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.81.051118     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. B. Derrida, Phys. Rep. 301, 65 (1998). 10.1016/S0370-1573(98)00006-4
2. D. C. Mattis, The Many-Body Problem: An Encyclopedia of Exactly Solved Models in One Dimension (World Scientific, Singapore, 1993).
3. J. L. Lebowitz and J. K. Percus, Phys. Rev. 144, 251 (1966). 10.1103/PhysRev.144.251
4. J. K. Percus, Phys. Rev. A 9, 557 (1974). 10.1103/PhysRevA.9.557
5. S. Gupta, S. N. Majumdar, C. Godrèche, and M. Barma, Phys. Rev. E 76, 021112 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.021112
6. E. Ben-Naim and P. L. Krapivsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 190602 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.190602
7. M. Buttiker and R. Landauer, J. Phys. C 13, L325 (1980). 10.1088/0022-3719/13/13/001
8. Y. Imry and B. Gavish, J. Chem. Phys. 61, 1554 (1974). 10.1063/1.1682100
9. D. S. Banks and C. Fradin, Biophys. J. 89, 2960 (2005). 10.1529/biophysj.104.051078
10. I. Golding and E. C. Cox, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 098102 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.098102
11. T. E. Harris, J. Appl. Probab. 2, 323 (1965). 10.2307/3212197
12. D. G. Levitt, Phys. Rev. A 8, 3050 (1973). 10.1103/PhysRevA.8.3050
13. H. van Beijeren, K. W. Kehr, and R. Kutner, Phys. Rev. B 28, 5711 (1983). 10.1103/PhysRevB.28.5711
14. M. Kollmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 180602 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90. 180602
15. L. Lizana and T. Ambjörnsson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 200601 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.200601
16. / 2 behavior of the MSD. Without interactions with the heat bath the MSD would grow as t in a one-dimensional hard rod system
17. [D. Jepsen, J. Math. Phys. 6, 405 (1965) 10.1063/1.1704288
18. J. Lebowitz and J. Percus, Phys. Rev. 155, 122 (1967)]. 10.1103/PhysRev.155.122
19. C. Lutz, M. Kollmann, and C. Bechinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 026001 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.026001
20. Q. H. Wei, C. Bechinger, and P. Leiderer, Science 287, 625 (2000). 10.1126/science.287.5453.625
21. B. Lin, M. Meron, B. Cui, S. A. Rice, and H. Diamant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 216001 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.216001
22. T. Meersmann, J. W. Logan, R. Simonutti, S. Caldarelli, A. Comotti, P. Sozzani, L. G. Kaiser, and A. Pines, J. Phys. Chem. A 104, 11665 (2000). 10.1021/jp002322v
23. K. Hahn, J. Kärger, and V. Kukla, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2762 (1996). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.2762
24. J. Karger and D. M. Ruthven, Diffusion in Zeolites and Other Microporous Solids (Wiley, New York, 1992).
25. M. A. Wilson, W. D. Hoff, C. Hall, B. McKay, and A. Hiley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 125503 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.125503
26. V. Gupta, S. S. Nivarthi, A. V. McCormick, and H. Ted Davis, Chem. Phys. Lett. 247, 596 (1995). 10.1016/S0009-2614(95)01246-X
27. E. Lutz, Phys. Rev. E 64, 051106 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.051106
28. S. C. Kou and X. S. Xie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 180603 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.180603
29. S. Burov and E. Barkai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 070601 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.070601
30. I. Goychuk, Phys. Rev. E 80, 046125 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.046125
31. W. Min, G. Luo, B. J. Cherayil, S. C. Kou, and X. S. Xie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 198302 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.198302
32. E. Barkai and R. Silbey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 050602 (2009); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.050602
33. E. Barkai and R. Silbey, Phys. Rev. E 81, 041129 (2010). 10.1103/PhysRevE.81.041129
34. Long-ranged interactions yielding nonextensive behavior, e.g., an unscreened Coulomb potential, are omitted.
35. A. I. U. Grosberg, A. R. Khokhlov, and Y. A. Atanov, Statistical Physics of Macromolecules (AIP, Woodbury, NY, 1994).
36. The probability density function (PDF) for the particle is Gaussian due to the Gaussian nature of the noise and linearity of Eq.. This behavior corresponds to fractional Brownian motion
37. [B. B. Mandelbrot and J. W. van Ness, SIAM Rev. 10, 422 (1968)] 10.1137/1010093
38. and contrasts anomalous diffusion governed by a fractional Fokker-Planck equation where the (PDF) asymptotically is a stretched Gaussian
39. [R. Metzler and J. Klafter, Phys. Rep. 339, 1 (2000)]. 10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00070-3
40. S. Alexander and P. Pincus, Phys. Rev. B 18, 2011 (1978). 10.1103/PhysRevB.18.2011
41. P. A. Fedders, Phys. Rev. B 17, 40 (1978). 10.1103/PhysRevB.17.40
42. P. Gonçalves and M. Jara, J. Stat. Phys. 132, 1135 (2008). 10.1007/s10955-008-9595-y
43. See Eqs (23) and (48) of
44. T. Ala-Nissila, R. Ferrando, and S. C. Ying, Adv. Phys. 51, 949 (2002). 10.1080/00018730110107902
45. We point out that the case with thermal (equilibrium) initial conditions corresponds to using a Fourier transform in time. However, our Laplace analysis in time domain is more general and allows studies of other types of initial distributions.
46. ′.
47. A. Taloni and M. A. Lomholt, Phys. Rev. E 78, 051116 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.051116
48. R. Kubo, Rep. Prog. Phys. 29, 255 (1966). 10.1088/0034-4885/29/1/306
49. S. F. Burlatsky, G. Oshanin, M. Moreau, and W. P. Reinhardt, Phys. Rev. E 54, 3165 (1996). 10.1103/PhysRevE.54.3165
50. S. Burov and E. Barkai, Phys. Rev. E 78, 031112 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.031112
51. H. Yang, G. Luo, P. Karnchanaphanurach, T. M. Louie, I. Rech, S. Cova, L. Xun, and X. S. Xie, Science 302, 262 (2003). 10.1126/science.1086911
52. R. Granek and J. Klafter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 098106 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.098106
53. R. Kupferman, J. Stat. Phys. 114, 291 (2004). 10.1023/B:JOSS.0000003113. 22621.f0
54. For hard-core particles in higher dimensions the quasistatic approximation is expected to break down, at least for low particle densities since a tracer particle diffuses normally invalidating the above argument.
55. The compressibility of the particle system does not necessarily involve the compressibility of the medium between the particles. For instance, if the particles are embedded in water that can flow past the particles, then the statistical mechanical calculation of the compressibility of the particle system should involve water kept at a uniform chemical potential.